Did G20 Police Use Agents Provocateurs?

Did G20 Police Use Agents Provocateurs?

Author
Discussion

Duke of Rothesay

Original Poster:

671 posts

186 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
New York Times
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/protes...

He writes that it appeared to at least these two photographers that most of the much-photographed violence on Wednesday evening was caused by people who looked like “agent provocateurs,” who “were going from police line to police line baiting the police — and they were the ones who instigated the push against police lines that kicked off the evening violence.” This photographer adds that “There was another guy baiting the police and whipping up the crowd to rush the police, he got a hundred or so protesters to follow him and then sneaked off as they reached police lines.” He also writes that the second photographer, who is a reliable reporter, “saw a bunch of protesters trying to stop a guy in black throwing bottles at the police, the protesters had an argument him and then accused him of being a policeman, whereupon he ran to the police cordon, showed some I.D. and was let through!”

Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/10/g20...

When I was in the middle of the crowd, two people came over to me and said, 'There are people over there who we believe are policemen and who have been encouraging the crowd to throw things at the police,'" Brake said. But when the crowd became suspicious of the men and accused them of being police officers, the pair approached the police line and passed through after showing some form of identification.

Duke of Rothesay

Original Poster:

671 posts

186 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all

Dunk76

4,350 posts

220 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Really DoR, what is your issue with the Police?

It would probably limit the amount of abuse which is now coming your way and actually state why your position is such as it is.

agentzigzag

191 posts

191 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Complete and utter BS, worst conspiracy ever, just ahead of the Queen being a lizard.

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

221 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Operation Rose on Ashes to Ashes refers to the plot by the dark forces to rid the world of England's Rose - Diana.

It's true.

wobblenutssilly

Battenburg Bob

8,707 posts

198 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
I bet you're a bundle of fun. Sat in your darkened room all day and night, searching the world wide web for any rubbish you can find against the Police. I'm sure the people filmed attacking Police with poles and iron bars (causing significant injury) were Police as well. They couldn't possibly be lentil eating anarchist keeping themselves busy until their next dole cheque arrives.

I bet you've got a poster on your wall saying the 9/11 attacks were carried out by a George Bush cylon!

chris watton

22,478 posts

266 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Six Fiend said:
Operation Rose on Ashes to Ashes refers to the plot by the dark forces to rid the world of England's Rose - Diana.

It's true.

wobblenutssilly
Talking of Ashes to Ashes - what a fantastic show! I watched it for the first time last week - must try and watch the previous ones...

V8mate

45,899 posts

195 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Saw the thread title and thought that the riot tough guys had been caught wearing stockings and sussies under their combat gear.


getmecoat

Puggit

48,764 posts

254 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Saw the thread title and thought that the riot tough guys had been caught wearing stockings and sussies under their combat gear.


getmecoat
Dammit - beat me to it!

I'm going to lighten the mood

NSFW!

Deva Link

26,934 posts

251 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest, but there's probably enough people who turn up at these things just for a ruck to make the make the use of agents provocateurs un-neccessary.

Edited by Deva Link on Tuesday 19th May 10:10

Duke of Rothesay

Original Poster:

671 posts

186 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Battenburg Bob said:
I bet you're a bundle of fun. Sat in your darkened room all day and night, searching the world wide web for any rubbish you can find against the Police. I'm sure the people filmed attacking Police with poles and iron bars (causing significant injury) were Police as well. They couldn't possibly be lentil eating anarchist keeping themselves busy until their next dole cheque arrives.

I bet you've got a poster on your wall saying the 9/11 attacks were carried out by a George Bush cylon!
You always lower yourself to personal insults. Perhaps because you have nothing better to say.
All I have done is to report news stories from respected news media.
And are you saying that video is rubbish? To me it looked like police officers beating up people who were sitting on the ground. Very brave of them.

And as for "Lentil Eating Anarchist", you could at least have tried reading the stories so as to be less ignorant. The man making the claim in the Guardian article is an MP who was there.

hugo a gogo

23,379 posts

239 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
close ranks eh lads

DoR does come out with some guff, but police can and do use undercover people to discredit protestors

Dunk76

4,350 posts

220 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Okay, I'll humour him, despite ignoring my pretty fair question above.

Howabout they weren't Police agents.

Howabout the people in question were anarchist/fringe elements of whatever groups were there on the day, and they were using fake ID - such as NUJ/Press passes - to move into and out of the trouble spots?

Crazy notion I know, but probably less crazy than the police using agents to start trouble.

hugo a gogo

23,379 posts

239 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
were press allowed through the police lines?

anonymous-user

60 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Battenburg Bob said:
I bet you've got a poster on your wall saying the 9/11 attacks were carried out by a George Bush cylon!
Haven't you been paying attention? The police blatently did it. Ever noticed you never see Ian Blair and Osama Bin Laden on tv at the same time?

Coincidence? I think not.

andy_s

19,519 posts

265 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Dear Lord.

The police do embed people within groups likely to cause trouble (football groups, large demos etc). They aren't briefed to be provocative though. They don't have to be. The police would have much rather the G20 had gone a little smoother don't you think? So hardly likely to stir up trouble that's getting them in trouble now don't you think? Much more likely the event was attended by a small proportion of people that were expecting violence and started some (that 5 minute footage of the bare chested bloodied man shouting and screaming at a police line for example) don't you think?

In fact, don't you think?

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Duke of Rothesay said:
And as for "Lentil Eating Anarchist", you could at least have tried reading the stories so as to be less ignorant. The man making the claim in the Guardian article is an MP who was there.
let me guess he was there to collect everybodies recipts so he could put them through expenses

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
agentzigzag said:
Complete and utter BS, worst conspiracy ever, just ahead of the Queen being a lizard.
Oh great, you had to go and tell everybody, didn't you.

XitUp

7,690 posts

210 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Not sure about the police putting people in the protests to stir up trouble, they seemed to be causing enough of it without that.

I love how everyone has a pop at DoR and calls him a conspiracy theorist when he's posted video evidence of the police assaulting people, or do you think he made that himself? All cgi?

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Not sure about the police putting people in the protests to stir up trouble, they seemed to be causing enough of it without that.

I love how everyone has a pop at DoR and calls him a conspiracy theorist when he's posted video evidence of the police assaulting people, or do you think he made that himself? All cgi?
I think people are having a pop at him because A) He has no interest in balanced debate; the Police are scum, that's it and B) He is talking b*llocks on this occassion.