Ian Tomlinson..3rd autopsy result

[gordon lonsdale]

What the devils happening here, have I missed the crucial announcement or have the results of the 3rd autopsy(if it was ever carried out) been kicked into the long grass never to be revealed? Maybe its for the best we never know .

[digger_R]

apparently he died of swine flu, or something

[Duke of Rothesay]

No sign of it.
Latest news:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/davehillblog/2009/apr...

[thinfourth2]

After that many autopsy he must look like a bag of mince

[Ayahuasca]

digger_R said:

apparently he died of swine flu, or something

Well it was definitely pig-related.

[mybrainhurts]

:groan:

[King Herald]

gordon lonsdale said:

What the devils happening here, have I missed the crucial announcement or have the results of the 3rd autopsy(if it was ever carried out) been kicked into the long grass never to be revealed? Maybe its for the best we never know .

I'd guess the novelty has worn off, thus the Daily Drivel trash media won't be interested in featuring lies about it.

[Simpo Two]

[Jasandjules]

I wondered if perhaps the result was not anti-police enough to make the news...........

[Duke of Rothesay]

Jasandjules said:

I wondered if perhaps the result was not anti-police enough to make the news...........

The second autopsy pointed the finger.
He had been beaten up three times by the big, brave police.

This third was requested by one of the officers that assaulted him.
If it had shown any different result the police propaganda machine would have been in full flow by now.

[Six Fiend]

Duke of Rothesay said:

Jasandjules said:

I wondered if perhaps the result was not anti-police enough to make the news...........

The second autopsy pointed the finger.
He had been beaten up three times by the big, brave police.

This third was requested by one of the officers that assaulted him.
If it had shown any different result the police propaganda machine would have been in full flow by now.

You are a human tabloid AICMFP.

[Mr_annie_vxr]

Duke of Rothesay said:

Jasandjules said:

I wondered if perhaps the result was not anti-police enough to make the news...........

The second autopsy pointed the finger.
He had been beaten up three times by the big, brave police.

This third was requested by one of the officers that assaulted him.
If it had shown any different result the police propaganda machine would have been in full flow by now.

You really are a first grade cock. You don't even realise that your spouted emotive tabloid rubbish alienates those who may have had some sympathy towards points you are making.

[Duke of Rothesay]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

Duke of Rothesay said:

Jasandjules said:

I wondered if perhaps the result was not anti-police enough to make the news...........

The second autopsy pointed the finger.
He had been beaten up three times by the big, brave police.

This third was requested by one of the officers that assaulted him.
If it had shown any different result the police propaganda machine would have been in full flow by now.

You really are a first grade cock. You don't even realise that your spouted emotive tabloid rubbish alienates those who may have had some sympathy towards points you are making.

Silly me, we all know he was a hardened muslim terrorist who beat himself to death despite the best efforts of our brave constabulary to save him.

Have you already forgotten the police lies and cover up when they killed Jean Charles de Menezes?

[Mr_annie_vxr]

You just don't get it do you. Your still spouting off like a cheap tabloid journalist. You have such an enormous chip on your shoulder you are unable to put a point or express a view without adding 'weight' by exageration and emotion. That makes your views seem so extreme that it pushes others away from your viewpoint. It's happened in thread after thread on here. You come over as conspiracy nutter.

As for beatings you keep saying were given out. I'd not describe what happened to tomlinson as a beating. Assault yes. Unlawfull possibly. Illegal? Maybe. A beating involves fee more than a strike or a push. To give someone a beating implies a sustained assault. So to use the word in this context yourself and the journalists using it are trying to evoke images that ate far different to the reality.

Still reality doesn't concern you. You just like to try to hammer the police and are rather gleefull about any chance to do so. You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

[Invisible man]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

I said as much 3 pages ago, if it transpired that he had been beaten up and robbed by a hoodie half an hour beforehand he'd shout 'fit up'

[Mr_annie_vxr]

Invisible man said:

Mr_annie_vxr said:

You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

I said as much 3 pages ago, if it transpired that he had been beaten up and robbed by a hoodie half an hour beforehand he'd shout 'fit up'

Still it keeps him occupied and away from the sean connery joke thread.

[gordon lonsdale]

Given its a couple of weeks now since the 3rd autopsy it makes you think it must be something really serious..mysterious even .Bet they've lost the papers or sumat .

[philthy]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

You just don't get it do you. Your still spouting off like a cheap tabloid journalist. You have such an enormous chip on your shoulder you are unable to put a point or express a view without adding 'weight' by exageration and emotion. That makes your views seem so extreme that it pushes others away from your viewpoint. It's happened in thread after thread on here. You come over as conspiracy nutter.

As for beatings you keep saying were given out. I'd not describe what happened to tomlinson as a beating. Assault yes. Unlawfull possibly. Illegal? Maybe. A beating involves fee more than a strike or a push. To give someone a beating implies a sustained assault. So to use the word in this context yourself and the journalists using it are trying to evoke images that ate far different to the reality.

Still reality doesn't concern you. You just like to try to hammer the police and are rather gleefull about any chance to do so. You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

I would suggest that you balance this forum, by having your chip on the other shoulder.
Somewhere in the middle will probably be about right. It's certainly not at the extremes you two are !

[Mr_annie_vxr]

philthy said:

Mr_annie_vxr said:

You just don't get it do you. Your still spouting off like a cheap tabloid journalist. You have such an enormous chip on your shoulder you are unable to put a point or express a view without adding 'weight' by exageration and emotion. That makes your views seem so extreme that it pushes others away from your viewpoint. It's happened in thread after thread on here. You come over as conspiracy nutter.

As for beatings you keep saying were given out. I'd not describe what happened to tomlinson as a beating. Assault yes. Unlawfull possibly. Illegal? Maybe. A beating involves fee more than a strike or a push. To give someone a beating implies a sustained assault. So to use the word in this context yourself and the journalists using it are trying to evoke images that ate far different to the reality.

Still reality doesn't concern you. You just like to try to hammer the police and are rather gleefull about any chance to do so. You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

I would suggest that you balance this forum, by having your chip on the other shoulder.
Somewhere in the middle will probably be about right. It's certainly not at the extremes you two are !

I have no problems with fair comment or complaint.

I do have problems with people who over state what happens or try to imply cover ups were none exist, or corruption where none is present.

I also standby my view that this poster due to his extreme view and glee that you can almost see does alienate those who may have sympathy for some of the views he expresses.

[DWP]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

philthy said:

Mr_annie_vxr said:

You just don't get it do you. Your still spouting off like a cheap tabloid journalist. You have such an enormous chip on your shoulder you are unable to put a point or express a view without adding 'weight' by exageration and emotion. That makes your views seem so extreme that it pushes others away from your viewpoint. It's happened in thread after thread on here. You come over as conspiracy nutter.

As for beatings you keep saying were given out. I'd not describe what happened to tomlinson as a beating. Assault yes. Unlawfull possibly. Illegal? Maybe. A beating involves fee more than a strike or a push. To give someone a beating implies a sustained assault. So to use the word in this context yourself and the journalists using it are trying to evoke images that ate far different to the reality.

Still reality doesn't concern you. You just like to try to hammer the police and are rather gleefull about any chance to do so. You couldn't care less about the person who died it's all point scoring for you.

I would suggest that you balance this forum, by having your chip on the other shoulder.
Somewhere in the middle will probably be about right. It's certainly not at the extremes you two are !

I have no problems with fair comment or complaint.

I do have problems with people who over state what happens or try to imply cover ups were none exist, or corruption where none is present.

I also standby my view that this poster due to his extreme view and glee that you can almost see does alienate those who may have sympathy for some of the views he expresses.

I thought it was fair comment, your replies are the ones that come over somewhat fevered. To claim the poster feels nothing for a dead man is a slur as bad as anything you believe has been perpetrated against the police.