Milliband orders private jet

Author
Discussion

Puggit

Original Poster:

48,763 posts

254 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
News of the World

He just doesn't get it...

Asterix

24,438 posts

234 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
He was on a flight with me a while back with all his minions - shame I only noticed when we woke before landing - I would have smothered him as he slept and done us all a favour. Taken one for the team, as it were...

Jasandjules

70,415 posts

235 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Why, don't all socialists have a private jet on stand-by? How do you think those eco/anti capitalist/soap dodging/anti car/ protesters can get around the world so quickly, learjets.....

bluetone

2,047 posts

225 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
They seem to have a death-wish. I can only assume that, realising the game is up, they've just given up trying. FFS they seem incapable of asking themselves "How will this play"? (in the media/with the public) Hence the seemingly endless gaffes and fk-ups.

Someone needs to put them out of their misery I reckon.

Martial Arts Man

6,625 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Enraging Sri Lanka, India and just about every other country's representatives he has met with.........now he needs a plane??

This guy has lost the plot!


Labour madness continues unabated!

Dunk76

4,350 posts

220 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Indeed, the guy is such a weapons-grade bell-end that the Tories will need to create a new Foreign Apology Minister - an elder statesman who will have to travel the world apologising prefusely, on behalf of the British public, for all the insults, slights, and obnoxious patronising statements this wker has made to them and their countrymen.


turbobloke

106,811 posts

266 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
FFS this is unbelievable.

Still, another nail in the coffin, and his work experience must be over soon so he'll be back in a sixth-form somewhere.

chris watton

22,478 posts

266 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
And this is the man who told us all that "The science is settled" regarding MMGW, and " We now all need to do our bit (pay more)and become more frugal......

Hmmmmmm

Dunk76

4,350 posts

220 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Although...

A private jet is far more likely to be shot down by Iran/North Korea/China/India/pakistan (or anyone else he's insulted in the last four years)


supersingle

3,205 posts

225 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all


Labour, we're in safe hands.
laugh

turbobloke

106,811 posts

266 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
supersingle said:


Labour, we're in safe hands.
laugh
rofl

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
He's just trying to get access to a private jet whilst he has the chance, he's no doubt aware that it's very unlikely he'l get to use one next year biggrin

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
As much as I hate Labour, it's a bit of a non story. He needs a jet, changes in the RAF appear to mean that jets are not always available at very short notice and the Government quite rightly cancelled a project to buy a pair of jets last year.

Hiring a jet when necessary seems the best compromise.

chr15b

3,467 posts

196 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
i try normally not to take too much notice of this type of journalism, it's always written in a way to either make light of, or blow something up out of proportion.

but, given these people are travelling on my pound, why are they travelling first class?

my company will pay for flights where needed, but will generally pay for a standard ticket, i have the choice if i want to pay the extra for business class etc.

i can understand if on a last minute booking there are no regular seats left, but to stick these people in business and first class every time?

this country could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds on air travel alone if they went for value rather than luxery.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
As much as I hate Labour, it's a bit of a non story. He needs a jet, changes in the RAF appear to mean that jets are not always available at very short notice and the Government quite rightly cancelled a project to buy a pair of jets last year.

Hiring a jet when necessary seems the best compromise.
There is no credible reason why he cannot use scheduled commercial flights. I would also suggest that it could be used to promote the UK's airlines, but who on earth would want to be associated with one of them.

Asterix

24,438 posts

234 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
chr15b said:
i try normally not to take too much notice of this type of journalism, it's always written in a way to either make light of, or blow something up out of proportion.

but, given these people are travelling on my pound, why are they travelling first class?

my company will pay for flights where needed, but will generally pay for a standard ticket, i have the choice if i want to pay the extra for business class etc.

i can understand if on a last minute booking there are no regular seats left, but to stick these people in business and first class every time?

this country could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds on air travel alone if they went for value rather than luxery.
Here's the thing - if they were senior executives in a private or public company doing a great jb - not a problem - even if, as an MP, he was brilliant and furthering the Nation's standing in the world - there would be some value.

However to sum it up succinctly - he's a .

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
10 Pence Short said:
As much as I hate Labour, it's a bit of a non story. He needs a jet, changes in the RAF appear to mean that jets are not always available at very short notice and the Government quite rightly cancelled a project to buy a pair of jets last year.

Hiring a jet when necessary seems the best compromise.
There is no credible reason why he cannot use scheduled commercial flights. I would also suggest that it could be used to promote the UK's airlines, but who on earth would want to be associated with one of them.
I think commercial flights to some parts of the world are a little thin on the ground, not to mention the importance of having to be able to make your own timetable rather than allowing world events pass you by because the 8.30 from Gatwick was delayed.

chr15b

3,467 posts

196 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Asterix said:
chr15b said:
i try normally not to take too much notice of this type of journalism, it's always written in a way to either make light of, or blow something up out of proportion.

but, given these people are travelling on my pound, why are they travelling first class?

my company will pay for flights where needed, but will generally pay for a standard ticket, i have the choice if i want to pay the extra for business class etc.

i can understand if on a last minute booking there are no regular seats left, but to stick these people in business and first class every time?

this country could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds on air travel alone if they went for value rather than luxery.
Here's the thing - if they were senior executives in a private or public company doing a great jb - not a problem - even if, as an MP, he was brilliant and furthering the Nation's standing in the world - there would be some value.

However to sum it up succinctly - he's a .
in a private company i have no problem at all, lets take Sony, they make tv's as well as the cost of parts and nailing the things together, the cost of the telly takes up cost to trade. if Sony decide to fly first class for all their directors then this increases cost to trade and the cost of my tv.

as a consumer i have the choice to buy their product, or more importantly the cheaper product from another company who doesnt spend money in this way.

MP's need to provide value for money, basically we're paying for their perks, and there is no need to pay extra for a higher class, all the plane is getting to the same place at the same time.

Durruti

1,023 posts

244 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
As much as I hate Labour, it's a bit of a non story. He needs a jet, changes in the RAF appear to mean that jets are not always available at very short notice and the Government quite rightly cancelled a project to buy a pair of jets last year.

Hiring a jet when necessary seems the best compromise.
I fail to see how having a "rapid reaction" type Foreign Secretary brings any benefit to anyone.

Earth Quake in Guatemala? - FO can be there in six hours via private jet, everything's OK.

You see it just doesn't make sense. We maintain a diplomatic corps around the world in many far flung outposts - if we need a "johnny on the spot" we already have HMG representatives there to hold the fort until a scheduled flight can be found.

A private jet is all about an ego that wants to flit around the world at will dipping into things that should and could be dealt with through existing channels or properly scheduled and planned meetings.

Let's take another example - Bomb explodes in Islamabad. HMG wants to express deep concern and sympathy due to strategic nature of current relationship. 15minute phone call to pakistani PM - local facilities at your disposal sir, much sympathy but be strong, we love you loads and you're very important etc etc., maybe followed up with personal visit 5-7 days later when dust has settled slightly.

Why would you need to be there via private jet in under 12 hours?

What would personal presence of For Sec add over and above the phone call scenario? - except garner lots of coverage of unimportant man looking important and concerned stepping off his private jet.


The only proper use for a Foreign Office private jet would be as a suicide weapon if launched against the House of Commons (or Piggery as I will insist on calling it from now on).

What a complete and utter bunch of s our politicians are.

chr15b

3,467 posts

196 months

Sunday 3rd May 2009
quotequote all
Durruti said:
(or Piggery as I will insist on calling it from now on).
love it biggrin

i've been refering to them as 'pigs at troughs' for a while now, will remember that one