what would happen if the world has a single economy?

what would happen if the world has a single economy?

Author
Discussion

DamoLLb

Original Poster:

1,775 posts

201 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
As title really. Would do you think the outcome of a single world economy would be?

chunkymonkey71

13,015 posts

204 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Aren't economies based on trade and stuff?

Wouldn't that not work?

grumbledoak

31,761 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Why do you think anything would change? We have pretty free trade across the world now. In fact, we have done for centuries.

toasty

7,656 posts

226 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
bureaux de change would go out of business.

gtdc

4,259 posts

289 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Not only would you have to worry about the antics at your gym, you'd also be very worried about the Romanians.

jeff m

4,060 posts

264 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
The same as is happening with countries that have been "euroed".

Germany, France are ok but a couple of others probably wish they hadn't.
It takes away the ability to revalue/devalue your currency.

Murray993

1,515 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
This is exactly the kind of qustion for the showers, it would go on for ages allowing for a full soaping....

DamoLLb

Original Poster:

1,775 posts

201 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Oh christ, I'm not the new 335d (mapped)




mods don't ban me for using it, it is with in context!

gtdc

4,259 posts

289 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
DamoLLb said:
Oh christ, I'm not the new 335d (mapped)




mods don't ban me for using it, it is with in context!
ut you are, for ever in my mind, soapy shower boy.

B

Murray993

1,515 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Mods please enforce name change - DamoLLB to be known as SoapyShowerBoy

SoapyShowerBoy

Original Poster:

1,775 posts

201 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
Murray993 said:
Mods please enforce name change - DamoLLB to be known as SoapyShowerBoy
furious

Puggit

48,762 posts

254 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
He said name change, not forum change!

s2art

18,942 posts

259 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
The world does have a single economy (comprised of loads of sub-economies). I dont know of any isolated country which doesnt trade and posesses autarchy. Do you mean a single currency?

AlexKP

16,484 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
DamoLLb said:
As title really. Would do you think the outcome of a single world economy would be?
Good question.

Ultimately, perhaps in centuries or longer time, that is where we will probably end up. And be all the better for it.

A single centrally managed economy, with regional free trade is probably the best solution in the long run.

s2art

18,942 posts

259 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Why? Do you think the EU has managed, say, Irelands economy better than Ireland might have?

Bing o

15,184 posts

225 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
SoapyShowerBoy said:
Murray993 said:
Mods please enforce name change - DamoLLB to be known as SoapyShowerBoy
furious
rofl

roflroflrofl

In fact


AlexKP

16,484 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No. Our current systems are clearly flawed. Ultimately, the global economy needs to be overseen by computers that aren't prone to rumour, panic and unmitigated greed.

Staple products such as energy, food etc should not be at the whim of massively wealthy speculators.

What is clear from the current mess is that the system has become too complex and unstable for humans to effectively manage it. No-one really knows what is going on...

s2art

18,942 posts

259 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
But computers are programmed by humans. They can only reflect what our understanding is, so how can that improve things? We already have computer models of the economy.
The rest of your post appears to wish for a Soviet styled command economy. That worked well didnt it.

esselte

14,626 posts

273 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You're joking about the computers surely?

AlexKP

16,484 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Not at all.

Computers are not prone to irrational emotional response. Eventually they will be ideally placed to remove the "human" element that destabilises economies for no good reason.

I am not suggesting that they would run all elements of the global economy - there should still be plenty of room for human enterprise and ingenuity, but they could bring stability to the key commodities that underpin our socio-economic system.

There is no good reason why we experienced the sudden rises in oil and food costs last year - these rises were the result of a few immensely powerful speculators who made vast sums of money from massively inconveniencing millions (even billions) of people.

The past year has seen large companies, and banks, brought to their knees by rumour and panic. These are human failings, and did not reflect the true value of such organisations, but rather a near hysterical reaction to perceived problems whether real or imagined.

We already rely on computers for much of our physical safety - air traffic control, road management, cars, planes, trains, spaceflight etc. The human element is still there, but it is moderated by powerful and dedicated control software. This is only going to increase in the future.

I see it as inevitable - let the computers do the things they are good at, and leave humans to be creative and innovative.