Number 10 sorry for 'juvenile' e-mails smearing Tories

Number 10 sorry for 'juvenile' e-mails smearing Tories

Author
Discussion

turbobloke

Original Poster:

106,943 posts

266 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7994408.stm

BBC political correspondent Laura Kuenssburg said she understood their author to be Damian McBride, the prime minister's ex-political press officer.

A Number 10 spokesman said the messages were "juvenile and inappropriate".

The Tories said it was "absurd" that advisers were "plotting smear campaigns rather than focusing on how to help people affected by the downturn".

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/4283950.Down...juvenileemails/

ONE of Gordon Brown's officials was forced to apologise for sending juvenile and inappropriate emails from a Number 10 account, it emerged tonight.

The private missives featured ideas for potential smear stories about senior Conservatives, it was claimed.

The author . . . is said to be a senior Downing Street official who was emailing Derek Draper, who runs a Labour-supporting political blog.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "Neither the Prime Minister nor anybody else in Downing Street, except the author, knew anything about any of these private emails.

"The author of these emails has apologised for their juvenile and inappropriate nature and for the embarrassment caused.

Puggit

48,768 posts

254 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
They'll do anything to cling on to office!

Mannginger

9,427 posts

263 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
This is like the death throes of the Tories before New Labour came to power. It really is going to be a crushing defeat for them at the next election although they've still got a whole year in which to screw it up further (fortunately / unfortunately)!

(10th May 2010 is the last possible date of the next election IIRC?)

turbobloke

Original Poster:

106,943 posts

266 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
It really does reek of desperation, will calling it a 'juvenile' act on the part of an individual and distancing the incompetent Clown and his team from an 'independent author' really fool anybody? As to lectures on the 'appropriate use of resources' ffs this is Meltdown Brown the Big Spender. What a total and utter farce. Anyone seen Mandy?

Jasandjules

70,420 posts

235 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Smear Campaign?

Target the man, not the policies (because they can't do better than the Tory policies I guess).

Durruti

1,023 posts

244 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Those who follow the Guido Fawkes blog - http://www.order-order.com/ will be familiar with the developing battle.

Thankfully, it would appear that Guido really does have the bit between his teeth on this one and we may yet see further information come to light.

How many more revelations about how these people spend their time and our money can the public take?

The only real precedent I can think of for this sort of institutionally corrupt administration is Nixons Whitehouse '72-'74.

Interesting days.

paddyhasneeds

54,532 posts

216 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
There's a difference here though - AIUI McBride is a paid civil servant and is not supposed to be "Labour".

unrepentant

21,671 posts

262 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
paddyhasneeds said:
There's a difference here though - AIUI McBride is a paid civil servant and is not supposed to be "Labour".
So were Alistair Campbell, Lance Price and Jo Moore?

Agree with earlier posters that the next election campaign is going to be fought in the gutter.

paddyhasneeds

54,532 posts

216 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
paddyhasneeds said:
There's a difference here though - AIUI McBride is a paid civil servant and is not supposed to be "Labour".
So were Alistair Campbell, Lance Price and Jo Moore?

Agree with earlier posters that the next election campaign is going to be fought in the gutter.
Hmm I didn't know that - assumed they were paid for by Labour.

Naive question but have Civil Servants always had such levels of (obvious) bias?

unrepentant

21,671 posts

262 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
paddyhasneeds said:
unrepentant said:
paddyhasneeds said:
There's a difference here though - AIUI McBride is a paid civil servant and is not supposed to be "Labour".
So were Alistair Campbell, Lance Price and Jo Moore?

Agree with earlier posters that the next election campaign is going to be fought in the gutter.
Hmm I didn't know that - assumed they were paid for by Labour.

Naive question but have Civil Servants always had such levels of (obvious) bias?
I'm not certain about Campbell but I think that all press secretaries are civil servants, as are special advisors. They are parachuted in with governments and usually leave with them. Civil servants are not supposed to be biased, they serve HM government but I guess they are all human so....

Skywalker

3,269 posts

220 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
The story has evolved following a couple of FOI requests that went in - appraently one from Guido and another an MP that was being verballed-up in the smear campaign.

Could it be that McBride on Winky's say so was co-ordinating Draper's blog smears?

Skywalker

3,269 posts

220 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Courtesy of the BBC story on their site - and 2nd artcle on their 1pm news

BBC said:
Mr McBride, a special adviser in Downing Street, was removed from his job dealing with the media on a day-to-day basis following the resignation of former Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly in September 2008.

The handling of her departure from government was widely seen as chaotic, our correspondent said.

But Mr McBride stayed on in Number 10, and was given responsibility for strategy and planning.
Edited by Skywalker on Saturday 11th April 13:11

turbobloke

Original Poster:

106,943 posts

266 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Strategy and planning? So hardly disconnected from the machine then.

Anyway, strategy and planning rofl

brain donor

853 posts

196 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
paddyhasneeds said:
unrepentant said:
paddyhasneeds said:
There's a difference here though - AIUI McBride is a paid civil servant and is not supposed to be "Labour".
So were Alistair Campbell, Lance Price and Jo Moore?

Agree with earlier posters that the next election campaign is going to be fought in the gutter.
Hmm I didn't know that - assumed they were paid for by Labour.

Naive question but have Civil Servants always had such levels of (obvious) bias?
I'm not certain about Campbell but I think that all press secretaries are civil servants, as are special advisors. They are parachuted in with governments and usually leave with them. Civil servants are not supposed to be biased, they serve HM government but I guess they are all human so....
No. 10 Press Secretaries used to be career civil servants, eg Sir Christopher Meyer (Major's one-time Press Secretary) was a career diplomat who subsequently became Ambassador to Washington. Even Bernard Ingham (Mrs T's rottweiler) was a career civil servant who'd also worked under Tony Benn and Barbara Castle.

It was the arrival of New Labour that brought the politicization of former civil service posts. Press operations were given to Labour Party apparachiks who were employed as civil servants (ie paid for by the tax payer) while remaining Party workers. The amounts of "special Advisors" that ministers were allowed to employ on the public payroll was vastly increased also.

Which is why this has happened, along with many other abuses of the democratic process.

CivicMan

2,211 posts

207 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Derek Draper - one of the scummiest, sleaziest NewLabour luvvies to crawl this earth explains:

http://www.labourlist.org/derek-draper-emails#comm...

Remember he is also married to Kate Garraway, another face of Labourarselicking GMTV.

brain donor

853 posts

196 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
It's going to be very interesting how far this develops. Supposedly one of the Sunday nationals is going to run the details tomorrow, though rumour has it that some of it is unprintable (which begs a few questions itself).
Mind you, if Guido's got the full story, then it'll come out somehow.

Pravda The BBC seem to be doing their best to downplay things to help the Labour Party as usual.

loafer123

15,643 posts

221 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
It is a shame there isn't an issue that we could all get behind to demand the resignation of the government and a General Election.

I am willing to bet that the silent majority would mobilise as soon as one comes along.

Langweilig

4,391 posts

217 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
It is a shame there isn't an issue that we could all get behind to demand the resignation of the government and a General Election.

I am willing to bet that the silent majority would mobilise as soon as one comes along.
We'll see what this "Green" budget is all about. Probably hitting the motorist again!

Skywalker

3,269 posts

220 months

Saturday 11th April 2009
quotequote all
Guido & Twitter suggesting McBride's been sacked / resigned!!!

Skywalker

3,269 posts

220 months