Man convicted of blackmailing Katie Hopkins
Man convicted of blackmailing Katie Hopkins
Author
Discussion

Vanden Saab

Original Poster:

17,925 posts

103 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
A man who contacted venues threatening to disrupt Katie Hopkins appearances in a sucessful attempt to have them cancelled has been convicted of 4 counts of blackmail by a jury in Southampton.
There must be hundreds of activists looking over their shoulders following this verdict.

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/26482256.southamp...

Randy Winkman

22,423 posts

218 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
I've only looked at the linked article but based on that it looks good that the jury had the nerve to pick "her side" and convict. The article is a bit light on detail but hopefully others will see that whilst they have a right to speak up with opinions there are limits to what they can do in this respect.

butchstewie

67,578 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Sounds like he's crossed a line from simply protesting to whatever constitutes blackmail.

I doubt it's opening any sort of floodgate as people will still be able to protest.

What you won't be able to do - and presumably what this conviction shows you couldn't do - is behave the way this man did.

p4cks

7,496 posts

228 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
These little weirdos always seem to come from Southampton or Portsmouth. What is it down there?!

Gareth79

9,034 posts

275 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Seems he was threatening the livelihood of the venues rather than just the performances:

article said:
The prosecutor said Hutchings had told the venues: “If you think I will give up, you are very, very wrong. I will not stop until the evening is cancelled or your business is shut down.”

Hutchings also allegedly warned: “I will flyer outside your business, I will continue to post about your business in online groups – I swear that on my family’s life.”

...


Hutchings allegedly also told the venues that he had reported them for watering down their drinks and for not having properly carried out background checks on staff.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/25/venues-cancelled-katie-hopkins-shows-after-man-blackmailed-them-court-told

CMTMB

1,927 posts

24 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
Seems he was threatening the livelihood of the venues rather than just the performances:

article said:
The prosecutor said Hutchings had told the venues: If you think I will give up, you are very, very wrong. I will not stop until the evening is cancelled or your business is shut down.

Hutchings also allegedly warned: I will flyer outside your business, I will continue to post about your business in online groups I swear that on my family s life.

...


Hutchings allegedly also told the venues that he had reported them for watering down their drinks and for not having properly carried out background checks on staff.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/25/venues-cancelled-katie-hopkins-shows-after-man-blackmailed-them-court-told
It's quite incredible the lengths some people will go to in their attempts to silence people who have different views to their own. This nutter lost his mind completely.



JoshSm

5,044 posts

66 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
That took a while given the original 'week long' trial started in November last year, and now sentencing isn't until October.

98elise

32,579 posts

190 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
CMTMB said:
Gareth79 said:
Seems he was threatening the livelihood of the venues rather than just the performances:

article said:
The prosecutor said Hutchings had told the venues: If you think I will give up, you are very, very wrong. I will not stop until the evening is cancelled or your business is shut down.

Hutchings also allegedly warned: I will flyer outside your business, I will continue to post about your business in online groups I swear that on my family s life.

...


Hutchings allegedly also told the venues that he had reported them for watering down their drinks and for not having properly carried out background checks on staff.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/25/venues-cancelled-katie-hopkins-shows-after-man-blackmailed-them-court-told
It's quite incredible the lengths some people will go to in their attempts to silence people who have different views to their own. This nutter lost his mind completely.
Agreed. I disagree with her views, but she has the right to express them lawfully.

If people couldn't express the "wrong" view then we would still be locking people up for simply being gay.

119

19,919 posts

65 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
CMTMB said:
It's quite incredible the lengths some people will go to in their attempts to silence people who have different views to their own. This nutter lost his mind completely.
Plenty in here.

I wonder which PH member it was?

butchstewie

67,578 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
CMTMB said:
It's quite incredible the lengths some people will go to in their attempts to silence people who have different views to their own. This nutter lost his mind completely.
Pretty much.

Protest yes. That crap? Nope. I thought blackmail could attract quite a hefty sentence but I have absolutely no idea what's likely here.

Gareth79

9,034 posts

275 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
JoshSm said:
That took a while given the original 'week long' trial started in November last year, and now sentencing isn't until October.
Looks like the trial last month was a retrial, but I can't find any details why the first was halted.

Vanden Saab

Original Poster:

17,925 posts

103 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Sounds like he's crossed a line from simply protesting to whatever constitutes blackmail.

I doubt it's opening any sort of floodgate as people will still be able to protest.

What you won't be able to do - and presumably what this conviction shows you couldn't do - is behave the way this man did.
You can contact the venue disagreeing with them hosting a show, what you cannot do is threaten consequences if they refuse.
Consequences have actions. hehe

butchstewie

67,578 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
You can contact the venue disagreeing with them hosting a show, what you cannot do is threaten consequences if they refuse.
Consequences have actions. hehe
Exactly right.

fk around and find out leaps to mind.

Anyone know what the sentencing range is likely to be?

Patio

2,005 posts

40 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
4 counts of blackmail and released on bail?

Seems lenient, surely held on remand?

Sixsixtysix

2,851 posts

195 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Always nice to see the "left" side of the political divide showing tolerance, empathy and an open mind to promote constructive dialogue with those who have different views than their own.

Vanden Saab

Original Poster:

17,925 posts

103 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Vanden Saab said:
You can contact the venue disagreeing with them hosting a show, what you cannot do is threaten consequences if they refuse.
Consequences have actions. hehe
Exactly right.

fk around and find out leaps to mind.

Anyone know what the sentencing range is likely to be?
Anything between community service to 14 years. Despite the 4 counts, the severity of the offences and the not guilty plea as he has been bailed i doubt it will be at the upper end. It's not like it was saying something nasty on the Internet.. oh wait.

JuanCarlosFandango

9,793 posts

100 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Didn't some venues actually cancel these events too? Usually blamed on woke councils and police, but maybe there was a bit more to it.

butchstewie

67,578 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Didn't some venues actually cancel these events too? Usually blamed on woke councils and police, but maybe there was a bit more to it.
I would imagine there's some detail that may come out that will make it a little clearer what the blackmail was.

If you think about it most protest is basically "if you do X we will do Y to try to dissuade you" - now I'm clearly not a lawyer but there must have been a specific threat or something about his behaviour that went above and beyond that and constituted blackmail.

donkmeister

12,886 posts

129 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
"that's a nice frog-faced fascist harpy you have there... It would be a shame if something HAPPENED to it..."

I think she's a horrible st weasel who is only out for herself, but attempts to silence speech are a terrible thing and have no place in a civilised society. I see no difference between this guy and someone who threatens people for drawing pictures of big Mo. It's a dhead deciding he's moral arbiter.

Maybe he should just have walked in to the event and said "without our protection and generosity you'd quite literally be cooked", that's the standard way to slide violent threats under the table isn't it?

Warhavernet

1,486 posts

16 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
The medja giving this story a bodyswerve, strange, as blackmail cases rarely get as far as a court trial, plus a celeb is involved.