Ex-Southern Water boss charged over test manipulation plan
Ex-Southern Water boss charged over test manipulation plan
Author
Discussion

butchstewie

Original Poster:

66,728 posts

238 months

dukeboy749r

3,660 posts

238 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
I’m surprised it has taken so long for any director of a water company face trial/huge fines or sanctions.

Along with other former directors of substantive companies.

Too often it seems easier to just complain without any real action.

mikees

2,877 posts

200 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
I m surprised it has taken so long for any director of a water company face trial/huge fines or sanctions.

Along with other former directors of substantive companies.

Too often it seems easier to just complain without any real action.
+1

vikingaero

12,990 posts

197 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
I love this bit:

"Southern Water ... said it was a "completely different" company to a decade ago."

Well as the company has stated that then we should believe them and drop all charges. So if I robbed someone 10 years ago, I should be able to argue that I was a completely different person to a decade ago?

LittleBobbyTables

6,121 posts

214 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
DieselGate 2…. Wet n wild

monkfish1

12,322 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
butchstewie said:
Seems entirely believable to me. Most of these big corps have zero morals at all. And this was 10 years ago. In that regard things have got a lot worse.

darreni

4,490 posts

298 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
I assume these individuals received performance related compensation and benefits, therefore the avoidance of fines for southern water would have been of massive financial value to their remuneration.

hidetheelephants

35,313 posts

221 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
Not so much the tip of the iceberg as the head of the turtle poking out; these yahoos have been whooping it up on billpayers for decades and telling whoppers about it to the EA about the ste they were pumping into rivers and the sea. Hopefully the first of many such cases.

g3org3y

22,374 posts

219 months

borcy

12,051 posts

84 months

Thursday 23rd July
quotequote all
I wonder how many more have been upto similar tricks.

southendpier

6,186 posts

257 months

Thursday 23rd July
quotequote all
Prison time please - and for a very, very long time, if guilty.

Randy Winkman

21,989 posts

217 months

Thursday 23rd July
quotequote all
This is the sort of stuff that the drama series "Dirty Business" was all about. I said at the time that I was surprised there wasnt more media reaction to it.

monkfish1

12,322 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd July
quotequote all
southendpier said:
Prison time please - and for a very, very long time, if guilty.
I think its pretty clear they are guilty. I very much doubt any prison time will be involved though. People at that level have influence.

Ridgemont

9,415 posts

159 months

Thursday 23rd July
quotequote all
monkfish1 said:
southendpier said:
Prison time please - and for a very, very long time, if guilty.
I think its pretty clear they are guilty. I very much doubt any prison time will be involved though. People at that level have influence.
Is it?

The regulator allowed the concept of no flow days where measurements couldn’t be taken. After having moved monitoring to be conducted by the company alone.


The supplier lifted and shifted the material elsewhere.

I’ld be genuinely interested to know whether that was against the law or just ‘shenanigans’.

I may be wrong (hopefully) but my sense is that they (and no doubt other water companies) gamed a crap system. And nailing them for that will be hard. Because nothing they did was seemingly against the law…