Discussion
read about this a few months ago about the negotiations to purchase it, but it seems they have reached a deal..
https://news.sky.com/story/sky-to-pay-1-6bn-for-it...
One thing this article doesnt mention is that ITV i think are under contract until 2030 something to provide FTA broadcasts, after which time the whole lot could end up under subscription.
I think this will be another nail in the coffin for the licence fee.
Edit:
Bit more info here.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2wwgeg041o
https://news.sky.com/story/sky-to-pay-1-6bn-for-it...
One thing this article doesnt mention is that ITV i think are under contract until 2030 something to provide FTA broadcasts, after which time the whole lot could end up under subscription.
I think this will be another nail in the coffin for the licence fee.
Edit:
Bit more info here.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2wwgeg041o
Murph7355 said:
If they think this will protect them from "streamers", I think they are barking up the wrong tree.
As for the TV license....dead man walking. At least against its original purpose.
Agree.As for the TV license....dead man walking. At least against its original purpose.
A level playing field required is required across all platforms in terms of regulation. Same OFCOM rules across social media, streamers and broadcasters.
System is currently broken
The govt are clearly going to tack a tv tax onto streaming services anyway.
Regarding sky buying itv it’s a shame as it means all their back catalogue will be tied up with sky and shut off, probably includes lots of sub brands like Granada or whoever eg whoever made The Bill etc. and Poirot etc Stuff like that (I haven’t actually checked).
Regarding sky buying itv it’s a shame as it means all their back catalogue will be tied up with sky and shut off, probably includes lots of sub brands like Granada or whoever eg whoever made The Bill etc. and Poirot etc Stuff like that (I haven’t actually checked).
I do wonder if something similar will happen to the BBC in the end? I know I dont speak for everyone but I still see that the name has huge value across the world. And it might be a way for a government to take in a fair few quid like when other "assets" were sold off decades ago. Though I appreciate that history has shown that wasn't all to the long term benefit of the UK.
sparta6 said:
Irony of ironies.
Sky began as a single satellite channel. It struggled and Murdoch had to re-mortgage his own house to keep it afloat
ITV had a national license to print money, but had fat cats in charge.
Kudos to Murdoch, he out-smarted the fat cats.
Sky has been owned by Comcast since 2018, nothing to do with Murdoch now.Sky began as a single satellite channel. It struggled and Murdoch had to re-mortgage his own house to keep it afloat
ITV had a national license to print money, but had fat cats in charge.
Kudos to Murdoch, he out-smarted the fat cats.
AlexS said:
sparta6 said:
Irony of ironies.
Sky began as a single satellite channel. It struggled and Murdoch had to re-mortgage his own house to keep it afloat
ITV had a national license to print money, but had fat cats in charge.
Kudos to Murdoch, he out-smarted the fat cats.
Sky has been owned by Comcast since 2018, nothing to do with Murdoch now.Sky began as a single satellite channel. It struggled and Murdoch had to re-mortgage his own house to keep it afloat
ITV had a national license to print money, but had fat cats in charge.
Kudos to Murdoch, he out-smarted the fat cats.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



