Sir Chis Hoy has terminal cancer
Discussion
BlindedByTheLights said:
Just seen this on sky news and commented on the other Chris Hoy thread. Horrible to read about this happening to such a nice person.
What has he was a nice person got to do with anything? Cancer's a merciless killer and will take young and old alike. At least he has some time..I heard upwards of a couple of years?The Gauge said:
Personally I think LB made a fair comment, lots will be thinking the similar.
I didn't, neither did my wife. But this is NP&E where victim blaming is important, regardless of the validity. "successful = you're toblame".Steve vRS said:
Gutted for him and his family.
And the more time I spend reading posts in NP&E, the less I want to be associated with PH.
Agree.And the more time I spend reading posts in NP&E, the less I want to be associated with PH.
Big Nanas said:
The Gauge said:
Personally I think LB made a fair comment, lots will be thinking the similar.
I didn't, neither did my wife. But this is NP&E where victim blaming is important, regardless of the validity. "successful = you're toblame".Steve vRS said:
Gutted for him and his family.
And the more time I spend reading posts in NP&E, the less I want to be associated with PH.
Agree.And the more time I spend reading posts in NP&E, the less I want to be associated with PH.
Big Nanas said:
I didn't, neither did my wife. But this is NP&E where victim blaming is important, regardless of the validity. "successful = you're toblame".
LB wasn't blaming him, he was wondering if it could be a cause which I think is perfectly reasonable considering drug use in cycling and sports, regardless of what your wife thinks.But I'll check with my wife.
The Gauge said:
Big Nanas said:
I didn't, neither did my wife. But this is NP&E where victim blaming is important, regardless of the validity. "successful = you're toblame".
LB wasn't blaming him, he was wondering if it could be a cause which I think is perfectly reasonable considering drug use in cycling and sports, regardless of what your wife thinks.But I'll check with my wife.
Blaming someone for something that no one has any proof of (testosterone supplements) is purely evil, quite frankly. Why thats the first thing that springs to mind for some is baffling.
Louis Balfour said:
48 is young for prostate cancer. Casting no aspersions, but would he have been supplementing with testosterone when he was competing?
ffs, 4 posts in and you are casting aspersions! Always came across as a really nice guy!And with thighs like his, I don't think testosterone supplements would have made any difference! Cancer is just fkin evil!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff