Substantial Jail Time - For A Tweet
Discussion
Should taxpayers really be footing the bill for jailing this woman?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y8x2nnwx7t
|https://forums-images.pistonheads.com/15110/202409025162388[/url]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y8x2nnwx7t
|https://forums-images.pistonheads.com/15110/202409025162388[/url]
Edited by bad company on Monday 2nd September 14:23
bad company said:
Her husband’s status as a councillor should have nothing to do with it. I’d give her community service.
That would be much more useful.Jailing people for typing is not a healthy society even if they are stupid and you don't like the words. And in any case, the jails are already full.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Patio said:
Machete murderers being let out to make space for tweeters, mental!
Has this happened? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq82d7en0yxo.a...
Patio said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Patio said:
Machete murderers being let out to make space for tweeters, mental!
Has this happened? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq82d7en0yxo.a...
Reads as the gang member who supplied the machete got out early;
The one who actually carried out the attack isn't eligible for early release.
Though I do have to wonder why on earth attacking someone with a machete was manslaughter, not murder.
(Looking at it a chunk of this appears to be gang violence which the 'victim' was actively involved in violence when they were killed - they were trying to hit people with a baseball bat when they got slashed in response with machete...)
Though I do agree that the tweet should probably be significant community service rather than jail.
[quote=bad company]Should taxpayers really be footing the bill for jailing this woman?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y8x2nnwx7t
Incitement to commit arson and (presumably) kill.
So deffo illegal.
I'm sure in a normal times it wouldn't even be charged but they quite rightly need to make examples to stop it all getting out of hand.
Having said that couldn't they have found a better case to make an example of? She deleted the post and seemingly isn't a criminal outside of this one post. Is that really the worst post they could find?
Christ a guy who shared it got 38 months. God.knows that actually writing is is going to get:
"It’s worth bearing in mind what happened to Tyler Kay who reposted Connolly’s words.
The 26-year-old Northampton man received 38 months - and he pleaded guilty as soon as he could, thereby receiving the maximum one third discount."
Ironically the media are all sharing the post in full. Full on Streisand.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y8x2nnwx7t
Incitement to commit arson and (presumably) kill.
So deffo illegal.
I'm sure in a normal times it wouldn't even be charged but they quite rightly need to make examples to stop it all getting out of hand.
Having said that couldn't they have found a better case to make an example of? She deleted the post and seemingly isn't a criminal outside of this one post. Is that really the worst post they could find?
Christ a guy who shared it got 38 months. God.knows that actually writing is is going to get:
"It’s worth bearing in mind what happened to Tyler Kay who reposted Connolly’s words.
The 26-year-old Northampton man received 38 months - and he pleaded guilty as soon as he could, thereby receiving the maximum one third discount."
Ironically the media are all sharing the post in full. Full on Streisand.
Edited by BikeBikeBIke on Monday 2nd September 16:18
Edited by BikeBikeBIke on Monday 2nd September 17:36
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff