Labour thinking about introducing a ‘wealth tax’

Labour thinking about introducing a ‘wealth tax’

Author
Discussion

HoHoHo

Original Poster:

15,157 posts

257 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Not sure if this has a thread, I’ve been watching a number of YouTube videos suggesting the introduction of a ‘Wealth Tax’

No idea if this will actually happen however Unite have asked for the richest with assets over £3m in society to pay 1.7% as a one off tax to raise £20 something billion which can then pay for pay increases in the public sector. Of course, as also suggested this tax might well then become a yearly tax on your wealth.

Let’s be honest, £3m is quite a lot of money however it’s not necessarily that amount which worries some, it’s the fact a new tax is introduced and the threshold is moved to suit and possibly then comes down and the percentage rates go up and as we know, a new law or tax is rarely removed once introduced by government.

Can’t afford to pay?

Easy, we simply place a charge on your house and get the money when you die and if it becomes a yearly tax we simply add whatever % to our charge on your house on a yearly basis.

Some would say, you will own nothing and be happy, others will say those fortunate enough to have purchased anything with money already having been taxed deserve to pay more because they’re rich, some will be sitting here unaware of these rumours and others will be thinking about moving out of the UK.

Personally I think the government of envy is showing its true colours and the next 5 years will be interesting to say the least.

Discuss…….

kiethton

14,071 posts

187 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Unless it's sitting there in cash it's near-impossible to get a true net worth figure, especially if it's a paper figure...that decreases rapidly as soon as a stupid proposal like this is announced

98elise

28,225 posts

168 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Ita great incentive to build a successful business.

As soon as it pushes your perceived worth over the threshold you have to pay tax on money that may never be crystalised.

Getragdogleg

9,104 posts

190 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
£51.000

If you have over 3 million in assets.

wkers.




Jasandjules

70,505 posts

236 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Is anyone genuinely surprised? They need to p**s a lot of money up the wall so have to get it from somewhere.

andy43

10,598 posts

261 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
It’ll cost them more than they gather in to assess and then chase people who are anywhere near the threshold. Multimillionaires will be dead easy but someone with a two million quid house, a business, pension etc - it’ll be extremely time consuming working out who’s going to pay.
And that’s assuming assets will remain visible after they announce the policy…

frisbee

5,154 posts

117 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Is anyone genuinely surprised? They need to p**s a lot of money up the wall so have to get it from somewhere.
I'm surprised that anyone believes anything predicted in YouTube politics videos!

Scrimpton

12,636 posts

244 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
frisbee said:
I'm surprised that anyone believes anything predicted in YouTube politics videos!
This, with bells, glitter, a klaxon and an enormous sign saying "bullst" on it

Terminator X

16,330 posts

211 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Sounds a great idea force all the really rich people to leave the UK. What could possible go wrong.

TX.

Cold

15,573 posts

97 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
"Unite calls for 1% wealth tax on super-rich to fund UK public sector pay rises"


Non-Youtube link:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/a...

markbigears

2,340 posts

276 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
I’m more thinking the “rich” middle England will be an easier target. I don’t think they will stop at the super rich.

Mr Squarekins

1,182 posts

69 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
I wonder if it is individuals or households? I'm guessing households.

ATG

21,358 posts

279 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
This would be the same Unite union that refused to endorse the 2024 Labour Party election manifesto? Given Labour don't listen to Unite's policy ramblings, why would any of the rest of us pay them any heed?

Derek Smith

46,497 posts

255 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
The phrase the politics/government of envy is gibberish. It means nothing specific.

It would appear the tories failed in their financial management of the country and the current government needs funds. What suggestions are on the table? Tax the poor further? Yeah, that'll help because it will mean wages will have to increase as a high percentage has limited/no disposable income. Or maybe the middle-classes? Possibilities there, and there is the threat of excluding the exemption for school fees. But there's not a lot of money to gain from that. Tax the merely well-off? Yeah, that's promising. After all, the wealth gap has increased in my lifetime from 2.3:1 to 5.7:1.

What's funded this massive increase? Perhaps it might be lower taxes for the rich? It's been obvious. It's been significant. And the policies of various governments has been to ignore or encourage this gap. I'm not particularly fixed on a wealth tax. Any method will do to reduce the wealth gap.

We have a policy of low wages. The government systems encourage it by subbing workers who don't receive a living wage. It might be useful to make employers pay a fair day's pay. Seems reasonable to me. Saves all that wealth tax.

Cheib

23,760 posts

182 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
The phrase the politics/government of envy is gibberish. It means nothing specific.

It would appear the tories failed in their financial management of the country and the current government needs funds.
If you want to blame previous Governments I suggest you look at the last Labour Government under Gordon Brown. That massive spike in UK Debt in the late 2000’s was under Labour….you’ll notice nothing since including “paying for Covid” comes close. Yes we all know it was the GFC and politicians like to blame the bankers but when there’s a crime wave we don’t blame the criminals we blame the police. The police in this case are the Bank of England who answered to Gordon Brown (who had previously made the BofE independent when he was chancellor)


MrBogSmith

2,545 posts

41 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
It's a proposal from a union at a union conference type thing. I wouldn't leap to thinking Labour are seriously considering it.

Labour have indicated they are going to look at non-doms, windfall tax on the energy sector, off-shore trusts, foreign property buyers and some other areas which have no impact on pretty much everyone, including most people who are wealthy.

I don't think many people will find these objectionable.

From what I can read in terms of a wider impact, there's uncertainty around whether capital gains' tax will be changed.


Doofus

28,464 posts

180 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
HoHoHo said:
I’ve been watching a number of YouTube videos

119

9,574 posts

43 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Windfall tax on the energy sector.

That certainly won’t be passed on to customers.

No siree.

gazza285

10,186 posts

215 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
Why aren’t all taxes related to incomes/profits?
The amount of income tax I pay is related to how much I earn, if I have the temerity to earn over a threshold then I have to pay more. Why isn’t capital gains tax the same? Or corporation tax?

Cheib

23,760 posts

182 months

Saturday 24th August
quotequote all
MrBogSmith said:
From what I can read in terms of a wider impact, there's uncertainty around whether capital gains' tax will be changed.
The conservatives looked very closely at increasing CGT a few years ago (it was widely expected)…they removed the CGT allowance instead.

CGT at 40% will undoubtedly stop people taking risk with their money which is bad for growth (availability of capital is an important driver for growth). It will also see people emigrate…we’ll see business owners deferring selling businesses until they have moved abroad etc.