Jermaine Jenas sacked
Discussion
crankedup5 said:
What a surprise to hear that Jermaine Jenas has been sacked from the BBC. Alleged inappropriate
behaviour see’s him off.
Not even a yellow & straight to a red card.behaviour see’s him off.
Lineker’s going to be upset as apparently Jenas was going to be his “natural successor”.
Anyone know what he did?
don'tbesilly said:
crankedup5 said:
What a surprise to hear that Jermaine Jenas has been sacked from the BBC. Alleged inappropriate
behaviour see’s him off.
Not even a yellow & straight to a red card.behaviour see’s him off.
Lineker’s going to be upset as apparently Jenas was going to be his “natural successor”.
Anyone know what he did?
don'tbesilly said:
crankedup5 said:
What a surprise to hear that Jermaine Jenas has been sacked from the BBC. Alleged inappropriate
behaviour see’s him off.
Not even a yellow & straight to a red card.behaviour see’s him off.
Lineker’s going to be upset as apparently Jenas was going to be his “natural successor”.
Anyone know what he did?
I was talking about this with the missus. I think it puts the Beeb is a VERY difficult position.
Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
b
hstewie said:
Did he try pulling Alex?hstewie said:pingu393 said:
I was talking about this with the missus. I think it puts the Beeb is a VERY difficult position.
Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
Depends, in his contract there could be expected behaviour clauses. Same with any job. Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
Hugo Stiglitz said:
pingu393 said:
I was talking about this with the missus. I think it puts the Beeb is a VERY difficult position.
Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
Depends, in his contract there could be expected behaviour clauses. Same with any job. Whatever he did, unless it was illegal, is private between him and the Beeb. If the Beeb spill the beans and he successfully sues, they will be liable for his losses. If they don't spill the beans, they could be held partially responsible for any future (or ongoing) transgressions that they could have warned about.
A very difficult situation for an ex-employer.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff