Where woke policies go wrong?
Discussion
This has been coming for a while, surprised more police forces haven’t had cases taken against them to be honest
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13736409/...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13736409/...
mac96 said:
This reads as the force ignoring its processes, or not at the time having a process which would allow the rapid promotion of minority groups.
So they 'just made it happen' (ironically, as ifthey were in The Sweeney) which is what cost them the case.
But “allow rapid promotion” of minority groups is surely discriminatory also?So they 'just made it happen' (ironically, as ifthey were in The Sweeney) which is what cost them the case.
Ie. Bob is promoted more easily and earns more sooner because of their ethnicity, vs Jim who isn’t.
It’s racism. In the worst possible sense. Held back because of your genes of which you had no say over and which you’re born with.
In the 90s we were constantly bombarded with “we’re all the same” messaging, even MTVs (iirc) advert with x-Ray videos of people’s heads, you could only say we were human, age, colour, gender etc, were all irrelevant.
But today it seems all these labels ARE important now… and define job opportunities and thus socio-economic opportunities.
Racism.
I am still in contact with officers in my old force and I've been told of jobs being offered with the rider, preference will be given to minority applicants. At least one officer put in a report, which was returned with the statement that it was Home Office policy, as if that was some form of get out of gaol free card. It seemed my force was not the only one suffering such challenges.
While I can see the reasoning, it was unfair. It's attacking the 'problem' from the wrong end.
I applied for a post where the fact that a woman had been chosen for the post was well known and all but admitted, and boasted of by her. I was told there was no point in applying. I still applied - the interview process was quite involved and there were visits to various places and processes that seemed, and were, fun. The tests were testing. So testing, the woman failed spectacularly on one non-competitive and essential requirement.
I didn't want the post, didn't get it, but neither did she. I'm told by one bloke said he would take it further if the woman got the post as he did well in the tests.
While I can see the reasoning, it was unfair. It's attacking the 'problem' from the wrong end.
I applied for a post where the fact that a woman had been chosen for the post was well known and all but admitted, and boasted of by her. I was told there was no point in applying. I still applied - the interview process was quite involved and there were visits to various places and processes that seemed, and were, fun. The tests were testing. So testing, the woman failed spectacularly on one non-competitive and essential requirement.
I didn't want the post, didn't get it, but neither did she. I'm told by one bloke said he would take it further if the woman got the post as he did well in the tests.
DMN said:
Mrr T said:
Can anybody tell me what a woke is and what there policies are?
Woke is a US term. Imported over here by people trying to start a culture war.https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/engli...
African-American slang which is now mainstream
dave123456 said:
Equality of opportunity not equality of outcome is the only sustainable solution.
Indeed, and it has to be hoped that the two converge over time.If they don't, and after a generation of notional equality of opportunity you're still looking out at a sea of white, male faces, then there's a deeper issue (presumably subtle, extraneous and/or informal factors maintaining the status quo) and then policy needs to be a little more sledgehammer-esque. That's where positive discrimination comes in.
Ironically, as has been the case with "artificially assisting" women into board level management, encouraging equality of outcomes tends to be very sustainable, once you have it it tends to persist even as the mechanisms of intervention are done away with.
AmyRichardson said:
dave123456 said:
Equality of opportunity not equality of outcome is the only sustainable solution.
Indeed, and it has to be hoped that the two converge over time.If they don't, and after a generation of notional equality of opportunity you're still looking out at a sea of white, male faces, then there's a deeper issue (presumably subtle, extraneous and/or informal factors maintaining the status quo) and then policy needs to be a little more sledgehammer-esque. That's where positive discrimination comes in.
Ironically, as has been the case with "artificially assisting" women into board level management, encouraging equality of outcomes tends to be very sustainable, once you have it it tends to persist even as the mechanisms of intervention are done away with.
You can artificially assist as much as you like but if you are sticking round pegs in square holes and telling them they have done well then the round pegs will wind up feeling unfulfilled and the square pegs will end up resentful.
I’m not sure why you would need to “artificially assist” beyond providing a level playing field of opportunities.
LivLL said:
DMN said:
Mrr T said:
Can anybody tell me what a woke is and what there policies are?
Woke is a US term. Imported over here by people trying to start a culture war.https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/engli...
African-American slang which is now mainstream
The definition of "woke" has become "something I don't like"... Usually something they don't like but can't argue against without sounding like a .
captain_cynic said:
LivLL said:
DMN said:
Mrr T said:
Can anybody tell me what a woke is and what there policies are?
Woke is a US term. Imported over here by people trying to start a culture war.https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/engli...
African-American slang which is now mainstream
The definition of "woke" has become "something I don't like"... Usually something they don't like but can't argue against without sounding like a .
ED209 said:
This has been coming for a while, surprised more police forces haven’t had cases taken against them to be honest
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13736409/...
You do realise you're linking to The Daily Mail don't you?https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13736409/...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff