Coincidence?

Author
Discussion

Giantt

Original Poster:

607 posts

43 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Three days after the election this pops through the door?
Yeah the usual, doesn't apply if you don't live in London.... except,anyone following the priorities and policies of London borough's can see a programme of trial's that are liable to be followed throughout UK now?

pits

6,511 posts

197 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
I'm dead against the pedestrianisation of Camden centre

ChocolateFrog

28,659 posts

180 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Cars in city centres are a stupid idea when you look at it objectively.

ScotHill

3,527 posts

116 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
fk cars. It’s Camden, not Carden, and that’s for a reason.

But thete are still no bears in Bearsden and I am fking livid with Sturgeon about that.

valiant

11,350 posts

167 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Yes. Camden council have been sitting on this for years waiting for a Labour government so that they can pedestrianise the High St.

Klaus Schwab’s plans are finally being realised.

Rivenink

3,936 posts

113 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Damn, and I really enjoyed 'making progress' down Camden High Street....

speedtwelve

3,522 posts

280 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
pits said:
I'm dead against the pedestrianisation of Camden centre
Agreed. People forget that traders need access to DIXONNNNNNS...

Oliver Hardy

3,001 posts

81 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
I never understand why it has to be one or the other. I recall regular visiting a town in the late 90s, I think it was Daventry, when during the day the road was closed and it was a pedestrianised shopping street, then in the evening during peak times, and morning the road was open to traffic, seemed sensible solution

Police State

4,127 posts

227 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
Cars in city centres are a stupid idea when you look at it objectively.
Cities are a stupid idea when you look at it objectively. But then when has stupid ever been a barrier to the objective and nothing else brigade?


OzzyR1

5,920 posts

239 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
Makes a lot of sense.

Anyone coming from Hampstead / Chalk Farm already goes via Castlehaven Rd / Hawley Rd and onto Kentish Town Rd / Camden Rd rather than try to get down Camden High Street if they have an ounce of common sense.

I'm generally against vehicle restrictions being put into place but that 300m of Camden High Street is a no brainer for pedestrianisation.

hidetheelephants

27,828 posts

200 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
ScotHill said:
fk cars. It’s Camden, not Carden, and that’s for a reason.

But thete are still no bears in Bearsden and I am fking livid with Sturgeon about that.
Musselburgh was a bit of a disappointment too.

HoHoHo

15,157 posts

257 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
Don’t get me started about Cockermouth either.

Disappointed every time I go near the place.

21TonyK

11,907 posts

216 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
I've seen two town centres pedestrianised in recent years. Both have been reversed since.

Ian Geary

4,734 posts

199 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
Coincidence about timing?

No. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brie...


Coincidence that it's being considered under a labour government?

No. It will have been planned in advance, and this type of political decision is a local one.

It sounds like the op wants a thread about the advantages/disadvantages of pedestrianisation, but has got mixed up.

ScotHill

3,527 posts

116 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
21TonyK said:
I've seen two town centres pedestrianised in recent years. Both have been reversed since.
They're making people walk backwards?

rscott

15,262 posts

198 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
Ian Geary said:
Coincidence about timing?

No. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brie...


Coincidence that it's being considered under a labour government?

No. It will have been planned in advance, and this type of political decision is a local one.

It sounds like the op wants a thread about the advantages/disadvantages of pedestrianisation, but has got mixed up.
Was first mooted in 2019 and originally was going to be trialled in 2023
https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/23111637.camden-hig...

New consultation is here - https://consultations.wearecamden.org/supporting-c...


Electronicpants

2,790 posts

195 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
speedtwelve said:
pits said:
I'm dead against the pedestrianisation of Camden centre
Agreed. People forget that traders need access to DIXONNNNNNS...
They do say it will help people in *wheeeelchairss*

Hill92

4,571 posts

197 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
A lot of announcements that would otherwise have been made in June have had to be held over due to purdah during the election period.

Ganglandboss

8,370 posts

210 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
speedtwelve said:
pits said:
I'm dead against the pedestrianisation of Camden centre
Agreed. People forget that traders need access to DIXONNNNNNS...
They do say it will help people in WHEEEEELCHAIRS...

toon10

6,470 posts

164 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
I was there last weekend. It was hot, pride celebrations were in full force, people were there for the Hyde Park gig and there were more Americans wandering about than in America. I have to say, I didn't see much of an issue with all of those people and the traffic. Hell, as much as I was a pedestrian, I rather enjoyed watching the cool cars using the roads.