22 Years for murdering son

Author
Discussion

119

Original Poster:

8,960 posts

42 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all

turbobloke

106,837 posts

266 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.

PositronicRay

27,394 posts

189 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
[redacted]

heisthegaffer

3,604 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Utterly heartbreaking. That poor little lad must have gone through so much pain.

It beggars belief that people can do this. Thick, scummy bds.

What is the right punishment though? Is there punishment enough?


QuartzDad

2,341 posts

128 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
He's been given a life sentence with a minimum term of 22 years. AIUI he's going to be inside for 22 years before he can be considered for parole, he's not getting out in 11 ish.

Gareth79

7,973 posts

252 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
Pretty sure automatic release doesn't apply to life sentences with a minimum term?

The Selfish Gene

5,569 posts

216 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
i'm 48 , and that news report just made me cry.

Poor little guy didn't stand a chance. I hope someone in prison beats that to death.

Greendubber

13,684 posts

209 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
Nope, he could be released after 22 years but certainly not before.

Caddyshack

11,421 posts

212 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
QuartzDad said:
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
He's been given a life sentence with a minimum term of 22 years. AIUI he's going to be inside for 22 years before he can be considered for parole, he's not getting out in 11 ish.
That is how I read it too. I also think that is probably quite a normal sentence for the crime.

turbobloke

106,837 posts

266 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Caddyshack said:
QuartzDad said:
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
He's been given a life sentence with a minimum term of 22 years. AIUI he's going to be inside for 22 years before he can be considered for parole, he's not getting out in 11 ish.
That is how I read it too. I also think that is probably quite a normal sentence for the crime.
Yes, thanks for the correction, a life term with a tariff as opposed to a 22, so not so bad in terms of leniency. It still doesn't seem right as far as my sniff test goes, in terms of the depravity of the crime committed.

Others may sniff differently.

Caddyshack

11,421 posts

212 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Caddyshack said:
QuartzDad said:
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
He's been given a life sentence with a minimum term of 22 years. AIUI he's going to be inside for 22 years before he can be considered for parole, he's not getting out in 11 ish.
That is how I read it too. I also think that is probably quite a normal sentence for the crime.
Yes, thanks for the correction, a life term with a tariff as opposed to a 22, so not so bad in terms of leniency. It still doesn't seem right as far as my sniff test.

Others may sniff differently.
I don't think you can put a fair term on these...just comparable to what others have received or the guided maximums. Surely the death penalty would be right in a a slam dunk case like this?

I wonder if the prison guards allow other prisoners to get at them when they see what they are in for or if they are kept in very secure areas?

Geffg

1,223 posts

111 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Isn’t it also that on a sentence like that you’re very unlikely to be released on your first parole hearing ? So hopefully he’s in for at least a few more years past that minimum.
Kids / babies do drive you insane sometimes but how the hell can you do stuff like that to them, especially over a period of time aswell. Not like it was a one time snap but it was over a period of time. She should’ve got longer as she obviously knew about it or took part herself.

Caddyshack

11,421 posts

212 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Geffg said:
Isn’t it also that on a sentence like that you’re very unlikely to be released on your first parole hearing ? So hopefully he’s in for at least a few more years past that minimum.
Kids / babies do drive you insane sometimes but how the hell can you do stuff like that to them, especially over a period of time aswell. Not like it was a one time snap but it was over a period of time. She should’ve got longer as she obviously knew about it or took part herself.
There are some very disturbed people out there, I am guessing it may be learned behaviour from their own abuse experiences or mental health issues.

I imagine that if we had lived with these people before they had a child we would have quickly come to the realisation that they should not have been allowed to have a child (if that was a thing)

119

Original Poster:

8,960 posts

42 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Caddyshack said:
turbobloke said:
Caddyshack said:
QuartzDad said:
turbobloke said:
Out in 11 ish if he cleans his teeth every night. A disgracefully short sentence, and if the guidelines say that's about right then they're also a disgrace.
He's been given a life sentence with a minimum term of 22 years. AIUI he's going to be inside for 22 years before he can be considered for parole, he's not getting out in 11 ish.
That is how I read it too. I also think that is probably quite a normal sentence for the crime.
Yes, thanks for the correction, a life term with a tariff as opposed to a 22, so not so bad in terms of leniency. It still doesn't seem right as far as my sniff test.

Others may sniff differently.
I don't think you can put a fair term on these...just comparable to what others have received or the guided maximums. Surely the death penalty would be right in a a slam dunk case like this?

I wonder if the prison guards allow other prisoners to get at them when they see what they are in for or if they are kept in very secure areas?
Wasn’t Huntley in a general population wing and then got sliced by other inmates?

donkmeister

8,974 posts

106 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
The absolute best, most useful advice I ever received in my entire life is:

A baby does not have the mental faculty to try and upset you. Only the reptilian hindbrain works. If they are crying, there is a simple solution that is within your gift to provide.

That was at a free, council-run antenatal seminar on baby development.

Keeping that in mind at all times helped me no end. I synthesised that into a mental checklist... When she was crying she was either too hot, too cold, hungry, wet or dirty. Run through those, and if it doesn't help then run through them again until you track down the fault.

Even at the darkest times (I was completely alone for a few weeks due to Mrs D being hospitalised) that advice made it possible to get through a 1am then 4am then 6am crying spell without getting even slightly cross with Mini D.

They need to mandate pre-parenthood education. An absence of education doesn't excuse this (and frankly he can rot) but the giving of education might prevent it and less injurious levels of abuse also.

anonymous-user

60 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
This miserable, pathetic excuse of a human question mark is an excellent reason to bring back the death penalty. Might do him a favour if the inmates try to get to him and wouldn't surprise me in the least if the screws allow it

CrgT16

2,063 posts

114 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
What a low life!!

Now, why are we all paying for his rehabilitation for at least 22 years?

Happier if my contribution would go towards poorer hardworking people or children in need. But no… the guy deserves a chance… bks system we have!!

Caddyshack

11,421 posts

212 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
[redacted]

Simbu

1,835 posts

180 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
If you think that case had too much leniency... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-67...

These st stains got 14 years and no custodial sentence for mum. Different circumstances, same consequences. Another poor kid who never stood a chance with their scum parents.

COVID precautions caused a massive loss of oversight of vulnerable children and now there is a slew of deaths being reported. And they're the publicised deaths. The abuse that doesn't get reported is rife.

ETA: Saw this was 2017. That's a ridiculous timeframe to wait for justice. And obviously not COVID related. But my point stands.

Edited by Simbu on Wednesday 10th April 18:02

oddman

2,620 posts

258 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Simbu said:
ETA: Saw this was 2017. That's a ridiculous timeframe to wait for justice. And obviously not COVID related. But my point stands.
Cop on the news said it took that long to collate the medical evidence

Forensic pathology on newborn and very young infants is a superspecialist area where, unfortunately, demand for expert witnesses exceeds supply frown