Your Voting Intentions (Pt2)
Poll: Your Voting Intentions (Pt2)
Total Members Polled: 224
Discussion
oyster said:
Also what does the last option actually mean?
As it stands it captures anyone either ultra committed to voting SNP, Green or another small party - or it captures those who want none of the above.
In other words, two entirely different mindsets.
Trouble is, there are many options to fit in, and if anyone has any suggestions on one of the others that can be removed?As it stands it captures anyone either ultra committed to voting SNP, Green or another small party - or it captures those who want none of the above.
In other words, two entirely different mindsets.
dukeboy749r said:
sherbertdip said:
I voted "other" as I don't think any of them are worthy of being elected to run the country so will be spoiling.
Isn't that a waste though?I understand why people spoil ballot papers, but then you end up having had no say in who does, ultimately, run the country.
xstian said:
dukeboy749r said:
sherbertdip said:
I voted "other" as I don't think any of them are worthy of being elected to run the country so will be spoiling.
Isn't that a waste though?I understand why people spoil ballot papers, but then you end up having had no say in who does, ultimately, run the country.
As I moved around with work all over the UK I saw that Labour were not the best and became a conservative voter, then came the period of Blair etc when there really wasn't much difference between both main parties, they became shades of mauve. In the recent past however, the conservatives have become weak and self serving, Labour have a week leader and no real policies that can make me say "yes they're the ones for me" Lib Dem I suppose are nearest to what I would vote, but again weak, and as for reform, what a waste of space, so in my opinion I can't back any of them.
xstian said:
dukeboy749r said:
sherbertdip said:
I voted "other" as I don't think any of them are worthy of being elected to run the country so will be spoiling.
Isn't that a waste though?I understand why people spoil ballot papers, but then you end up having had no say in who does, ultimately, run the country.
dukeboy749r said:
sherbertdip said:
I voted "other" as I don't think any of them are worthy of being elected to run the country so will be spoiling.
Isn't that a waste though?I understand why people spoil ballot papers, but then you end up having had no say in who does, ultimately, run the country.
If you don't feel represented by the choices, the last thing you would want is to endorse a party that does the opposite on the topics you feel most strongly about (and there may not be a party that convincingly aligns with your view).
Still "None of the Above" for me.
There's not a single party, filled with people I would trust, who I think should be given the responsibility to run the country. Literally every single politician in my area, and those who hold more important positions, appears to be incapable of running a bath never mind a country.
The dearth of "quality" nowadays means that voting has never felt as much of a waste of time as it feels right now. I heard the term "Uniparty" mentioned and I think its kind of accurate today, where each of the two main parties has a few "special interest" differences but overall they feel very similar in their lack of ability, and neither main parties are central enough to grab the attention of the swing voter who will eventually decide the election, mostly likely based on who they think will do less damage, rather than because they fully support the party they feel forced into voting for.
Long post short - None are worth voting for, all are mostly filled with incompetent fools.
There's not a single party, filled with people I would trust, who I think should be given the responsibility to run the country. Literally every single politician in my area, and those who hold more important positions, appears to be incapable of running a bath never mind a country.
The dearth of "quality" nowadays means that voting has never felt as much of a waste of time as it feels right now. I heard the term "Uniparty" mentioned and I think its kind of accurate today, where each of the two main parties has a few "special interest" differences but overall they feel very similar in their lack of ability, and neither main parties are central enough to grab the attention of the swing voter who will eventually decide the election, mostly likely based on who they think will do less damage, rather than because they fully support the party they feel forced into voting for.
Long post short - None are worth voting for, all are mostly filled with incompetent fools.
deadtom said:
Silvanus said:
It's highly likely labour will win, not because people want them but because they are seen as a least worse option. It really is about time the whole process was reformed.
I came here to say exactly this.Both Labour and Conservative have a vested interest in FPTP - it's essentially a closed shop. What might eventually change this is if/when the UK sinks into a mess caused by decades of spending more than our feeble economic growth can support - a policy that both parties are addicted to. Like some addicts, we'll have to hit rock bottom before we truly change.
biggles330d said:
xstian said:
dukeboy749r said:
sherbertdip said:
I voted "other" as I don't think any of them are worthy of being elected to run the country so will be spoiling.
Isn't that a waste though?I understand why people spoil ballot papers, but then you end up having had no say in who does, ultimately, run the country.
At least by spoiling the paper it has to be counted as such.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff