Gary Lineker and Hamas
Discussion
Surely Lineker is in for the chop now. After tweeting that Israel should be boycotted from football, his tweet has been picked up on by Hamas and been retweeted. For the 'impartial' bbc, surely this has got to be where gary jumps the shark and there's no going back.
Maybe presenting for the new arab league would be more up his street?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12967175/...
Maybe presenting for the new arab league would be more up his street?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12967175/...
Four Litre said:
I fully agree, however I doubt your employer would.
What he has said isn’t even that controversial. If you are more angry about his tweet than thousands of dead civilians including children on BOTH sides then you need to rethink your priorities. Jasandjules said:
Freedom of speech much apply to views you do not agree with as well as those you do.
Or is this yet another bash the BBC bore fest? Probably thinking about it. Grr BBC grr.
sugerbear said:
Summary of the article.
Daily Mail says "sack Gary Lineker" for the 9,000,000 time.
fker refused to come out of the packet in my panini stickers in the 80's and played for Everton! Burn him!Daily Mail says "sack Gary Lineker" for the 9,000,000 time.
Rather annoyingly it appears he's a decent person despite playing for Everton.
Finished playing football 30 years ago.
In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
This is just the latest in a series of gaffes - no call for Russia to be banned, or Syria, or China etc etc.
Happy to take money from Qatar.
He needs to spend some of his overpaid salary to someone to manage his PR as he can’t, and I can’t see the BBC being keen on renewing his contract when it expires.
In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
This is just the latest in a series of gaffes - no call for Russia to be banned, or Syria, or China etc etc.
Happy to take money from Qatar.
He needs to spend some of his overpaid salary to someone to manage his PR as he can’t, and I can’t see the BBC being keen on renewing his contract when it expires.
LordLoveLength said:
Finished playing football 30 years ago.
In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
This is just the latest in a series of gaffes - no call for Russia to be banned, or Syria, or China etc etc.
Happy to take money from Qatar.
He needs to spend some of his overpaid salary to someone to manage his PR as he can’t, and I can’t see the BBC being keen on renewing his contract when it expires.
When his contract expires I hope that they replace him with Alex Scott and pay her double his salary. In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
This is just the latest in a series of gaffes - no call for Russia to be banned, or Syria, or China etc etc.
Happy to take money from Qatar.
He needs to spend some of his overpaid salary to someone to manage his PR as he can’t, and I can’t see the BBC being keen on renewing his contract when it expires.
LordLoveLength said:
Finished playing football 30 years ago.
In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
Did you think the same of Des Lynham?In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
Lineker is fking good at his job which is why he's presenting MOTD.
Pistom said:
He used to be a footballer didn't he?
Goal mucher.I can understand why some don't like him. Believe me I do.
But if you're going to read Daily Mail headlines uncritically you have larger problems in life.
Lineker can be a bit overly worthy and silly at times but those out to demonise him seem worse to me. They just look like a bunch of people who think there should be no contrarian views to their own and will pathetically try and ruin a man's career if they can. I'm glad he's not afraid of the attack dogs and bots even if I don't agree with everything he says.
Four Litre said:
I fully agree, however I doubt your employer would.
BBC issued new guidelines for presenters last year after one of his other tweets caused a big row. These allow for freedom of expression on social media except on matters of party politics, which this isn't.Jasandjules said:
Freedom of speech much apply to views you do not agree with as well as those you do.
Quhet said:
LordLoveLength said:
Finished playing football 30 years ago.
In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
Did you think the same of Des Lynham?In Japan.
Why the BBC think he is relevant to today’s football audience is a mystery - half of them won’t have even been born!
Lineker is fking good at his job which is why he's presenting MOTD.
Especially when the media narrative is increasingly about him making political points on social media against his employers social media policy (which applies to all their employees). A policy he has previously agreed to, with special dispensation to allow him have his posts approved which he has then ignored.
This is overshadowing his presentation ability. It’s a lot easier for the BBC to replace him rather than firefighting his inability to use social media as his contract states.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff