Forgotten conflicts

Author
Discussion

Skeptisk

Original Poster:

8,085 posts

115 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
I was discussing current wars and conflicts with my wife yesterday and she mentioned Syria. I had to confess that I wasn’t exactly sure what the current situation was. Having checked it seems that the various parties have reached a sort of stalemate, with no formal end to the conflict but Assad has managed to hold onto power and regained control over most of Syria. At one point Syria was very much in the Western news but now doesn’t get mentioned. I suspect there are lots of other ongoing conflicts that are ignored by mainstream media. Ironically before the Hamas attack in October the Palestinian/Israeli conflict had pretty much dropped off the map.

Biker 1

7,854 posts

125 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
Ongoing perma-war in that part of the world.
Russians I believe control a giant navy base & several air fields. Turkish meddling & incursions in the north. US outposts in several eastern locations. RAF Typhoon overflights daily (check flightradar24 mid morning/lunchtime.....). Iranians all over the place & several clandestine attacks by Israeli air force apparently to disrupt Iranian arms shipments to Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Oh, & die hard ISIS cells still in operation.
Hundreds of thousands dead, millions of refugees. Depressing & will probably go the same way as Somalia & Yemen.

ChemicalChaos

10,488 posts

166 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
Depends what you mean by forgotten I suppose.....

Having been watching a lot of MASH recently, it does often seem that the Korean War is overshadowed by WW2 on one side and 'Nam on the other, despite the huge amount of western lives lost during the process. The 70-odd year stalemate may cause people to forget how brutal and bloody it was, something like nearly 5 million soldiers and civilians killed

RichFN2

3,645 posts

185 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
Lybia is probably the most famous one I can think of after Syria, to my knowledge it's still ongoing with no body in full control of the country.

Yemem still ongoing, pops up occasionally in the news.

In Africa in general it seems that continent is never free from some sort of rebel movement or terrorist group fighting for something.

In Europe the Bosnian war was well known but the Kosovo war didn't seem to get the same coverage, and the pockets of fighting has only ended fairly recently when you include North Macedonia.

2008 Georgia war is easily forgotten by most.

captain_cynic

13,047 posts

101 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
Depends what you mean by forgotten I suppose.....

Having been watching a lot of MASH recently, it does often seem that the Korean War is overshadowed by WW2 on one side and 'Nam on the other, despite the huge amount of western lives lost during the process. The 70-odd year stalemate may cause people to forget how brutal and bloody it was, something like nearly 5 million soldiers and civilians killed
A lot of people don't realise how much the front lines shifted in Korea. South Korea was pushed back to a corner in the south east until August 1950, by November 1950 the North Koreans only occupied the far north until the Chinese crossed the Yalu river. The front line continues shifting around the middle until mid 1953 after China, Russia and the US had exhausted their appetites for war and sought peace.

boyse7en

7,045 posts

171 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
A lot of people don't realise how much the front lines shifted in Korea. South Korea was pushed back to a corner in the south east until August 1950, by November 1950 the North Koreans only occupied the far north until the Chinese crossed the Yalu river. The front line continues shifting around the middle until mid 1953 after China, Russia and the US had exhausted their appetites for war and sought peace.
Funnily enough, I happened upon this today. It illustrates the shifting front line and changing fortunes of the two sides very well.
https://9gag.com/gag/armQX6X?utm_source=copy_link&...

bitchstewie

54,504 posts

216 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
There are loads.

I read something the other day about Ethiopia v Eritrea (I think) where half a million people have apparently been killed.

Can't honestly say I remember seeing/reading/hearing much if anything about it.

Chromegrill

1,099 posts

92 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
Civil conflict in Denocratic Republic of Congo has been going on for over 25 years, and that in turn was a direct consequence of the 1994 Rwandan genocide. I worked in the region some years back and it's sad that such a beautiful place remains so fragile and fearful.

JuanCarlosFandango

8,163 posts

77 months

Wednesday 3rd January
quotequote all
Nagorno Karabakh seemed to be quickly forgotten.

Previous

1,492 posts

160 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
I suspect that part of the reason Syria is no longer in UK news is because the horse we eventually decided to back (removal of Assad) after Cameron first held and lost a vote about bombing one side (Assad) , then held and won a vote about bombing another (Isis) has essentially lost.






andyA700

3,191 posts

43 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
Skeptisk said:
I was discussing current wars and conflicts with my wife yesterday and she mentioned Syria. I had to confess that I wasn’t exactly sure what the current situation was. Having checked it seems that the various parties have reached a sort of stalemate, with no formal end to the conflict but Assad has managed to hold onto power and regained control over most of Syria. At one point Syria was very much in the Western news but now doesn’t get mentioned. I suspect there are lots of other ongoing conflicts that are ignored by mainstream media. Ironically before the Hamas attack in October the Palestinian/Israeli conflict had pretty much dropped off the map.
You may wish to watch these videos, to give you an idea what is going on in Syria, Libya and the rest of the Middle East. Please bear in mind, that the US supported Saddam Hussein against Iran and supported the Mujahudin (Taliban/Al Qaueda) in Afghanistan. The US/UK were responsible for the 1953 coup in Iran which removed a democratically elected prime minister - Mossadeq, then we were responsible for the 1979 Iranian revolution, where we believed that we could instal a "friendly" leadership of mullahs, before putting the shah's son back on the "Peacock throne".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcWs4TFSjrY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/13/ci...

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/2...

StevieBee

13,390 posts

261 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
Cyprus.

As conflicts go, it's as benign as it gets but is still very much in play and surprising that it gets hardly any mention, particularly when you consider Cyprus to be a commonwealth nation.

They came close to a federalised state in 2017 with a deal brokered by Johnson when he was Foreign Secretary but Turkey wouldn't remove their Army in the north unless the UK removed theirs in the South. Some suggested Johnson could have pushed this further but....well.... 'Grandpops' being Turkish and all that!


isaldiri

19,864 posts

174 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Nagorno Karabakh seemed to be quickly forgotten.
Just as well really. The azeris managed to purge most to all the armenians out after the last round of hostilities without having to go all 1915 again which just might have caused a bit more of a ruckus...

gt_12345

1,873 posts

41 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
andyA700 said:
You may wish to watch these videos, to give you an idea what is going on in Syria, Libya and the rest of the Middle East. Please bear in mind, that the US supported Saddam Hussein against Iran and supported the Mujahudin (Taliban/Al Qaueda) in Afghanistan. The US/UK were responsible for the 1953 coup in Iran which removed a democratically elected prime minister - Mossadeq, then we were responsible for the 1979 Iranian revolution, where we believed that we could instal a "friendly" leadership of mullahs, before putting the shah's son back on the "Peacock throne".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcWs4TFSjrY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/13/ci...

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/2...
What was the UK/US involvenent with the Iranian Revolution in 1979?

hidetheelephants

27,378 posts

199 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
There are loads.

I read something the other day about Ethiopia v Eritrea (I think) where half a million people have apparently been killed.

Can't honestly say I remember seeing/reading/hearing much if anything about it.
There was a massive ruck between Ethiopia and Somalia in the 70s; the russians started out supporting Somalia, but disapproved of the fight so they swapped surrogates and supported Ethiopia. The refugees from this fight caused dissent in Somalia and in part brought about the civil war there.
isaldiri said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Nagorno Karabakh seemed to be quickly forgotten.
Just as well really. The azeris managed to purge most to all the armenians out after the last round of hostilities without having to go all 1915 again which just might have caused a bit more of a ruckus...
Genocide is ok if it's bloodless? jester

isaldiri

19,864 posts

174 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Genocide is ok if it's bloodless? jester
It's usually kind of hard to genocide people without some (or quite a lot) element of bloodletting.

hidetheelephants

27,378 posts

199 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
hidetheelephants said:
Genocide is ok if it's bloodless? jester
It's usually kind of hard to genocide people without some (or quite a lot) element of bloodletting.
Yeh nah, it's genocide.

UN said:
In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly.[1][2]

VR99

1,298 posts

69 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
Sri Lanka - 25+ years of Civil war and easily over a 100k perished in the final stages of the war in 2009.
Some parallels to N.Ireland troubles and Israel/Gaza situation albeit based on historical ethnic fault lines rather than religion and other aspects differ.

A country known for the stunning location/views and in general very accommodating population but for some reason since independence from the British, run by despots (irrespective of party) using good ol' divide and conquer policies...no accountability for past/current human rights violations and minorites shafted. That's before you mention the Useless for Nothing sorry UN who love sending a rep every so often for a free holiday but don't do much else. To be fair the despots don't care anyway.

A failed state that had so much potential but instead struggles to play both India and China (their paymasters) to obtain freebies whilst not antagonising either (strategic location etc).

No natural resources of significance and a tiny country hence not really high up the list for anyone. Though some entertainment to watch the India/China overtures to keep on side/influence. There may be no war now but the old guard still run the country hence why the protests seen last year are very 'quiet' now.

  • Disclaimer - the views above are mine and biased but I stand by them.
Edited by VR99 on Friday 5th January 19:28

hidetheelephants

27,378 posts

199 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
VR99 said:
Sri Lanka - 25+ years of Civil war and easily over a 100k perished in the final stages of the war in 2009.
Some parallels to N.Ireland troubles and Israel/Gaza situation albeit based on historical ethnic fault lines rather than religion and other aspects differ.

A country known for the stunning location/views and in general very accommodating population but for some reason since independence from the British, run by despots (irrespective of party) using good ol' divide and conquer policies...no accountability for past/current human rights violations and minorites shafted. That's before you mention the Useless for Nothing sorry UN who love sending a rep every so often for a free holiday but don't do much else. To be fair the despots don't care anyway.

A failed state that had so much potential but instead struggles to play both India and China (their paymasters) to obtain freebies whilst not antagonising either (strategic location etc).

No natural resources of significance and a tiny country hence not really high up the list for anyone. Though some entertainment to watch the India/China overtures to keep on side/influence.
Ethnicity plays a part but religion is a big part of the animosity, a lot of corruption in the politicians and the chinese and the indians have no doubt helped out the corrupt with bungs and influence operations.

VR99

1,298 posts

69 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Ethnicity plays a part but religion is a big part of the animosity, a lot of corruption in the politicians and the chinese and the indians have no doubt helped out the corrupt with bungs and influence operations.
Agreed, whilst the conflict has been framed in ethnic terms it's the influential Buddhist clergy that run the show (along with the corrupt despots) and if anyone doesn't agree then tough.
India at one point (late 80's) armed/funded/trained the rebel groups and that didn't exactly end well for all sides in the conflict.