Toyota ad banned - ASA overreach?

Toyota ad banned - ASA overreach?

Author
Discussion

RDMcG

19,458 posts

213 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-22...

This seems to me to be complete madness. Should a Land Rover be seen to be driven only on a suburban street?.......

rodericb

7,079 posts

132 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
ha ha, the objection was about showing the vehicles being driven through the wilderness and "speeding" along urban streets. The complaint for the first detail was upheld as it was likely that those vehicles would never be used to be driven through wilderness. Didn't say that they wouldn't not be used to tear around city streets...

Ergo, I think if the ad was solely showing these vehicles tearing around urban environments it wouldn't be, false advertising as such as that's what they're actually used for...... hehe

Snow and Rocks

Original Poster:

2,303 posts

33 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-22...

I see that the ASA have now banned a Hilux advert for portraying what is effectively non essential off road driving.

The ASA ruling is pretty longwinded but ads apparently need to be “prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society. The impression given by the driving scenes and messaging in both ads was one of driving regardless of its purpose, across off-road environments and natural ecosystems which had no regard for the environmental impact of such driving"

It seems the complainers are a lobbying organisations who are against the very existence of the Hilux and other SUVs (!) in the first place. Given what is shown is a perfectly legal and commonplace activity across quite a large part of the world, this surely sets quite a bizarre precedent? If we ban the portrayal of anything anyone does for leisure that is detrimental to the environment there's not going to be much left!

The "illegal" advert in question.
https://youtu.be/o9UGhOWLimo

Castrol for a knave

5,201 posts

97 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Snow and Rocks said:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-22...

I see that the ASA have now banned a Hilux advert for portraying what is effectively non essential off road driving.

The ASA ruling is pretty longwinded but ads apparently need to be “prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society. The impression given by the driving scenes and messaging in both ads was one of driving regardless of its purpose, across off-road environments and natural ecosystems which had no regard for the environmental impact of such driving"

It seems the complainers are a lobbying organisations who are against the very existence of the Hilux and other SUVs (!) in the first place. Given what is shown is a perfectly legal and commonplace activity across quite a large part of the world, this surely sets quite a bizarre precedent? If we ban the portrayal of anything anyone does for leisure that is detrimental to the environment there's not going to be much left!

The "illegal" advert in question.
https://youtu.be/o9UGhOWLimo
The advert looks like the road to Aberdovey in Birmingham holiday week.



LunarOne

5,708 posts

143 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Absolute madness. It feels as if the moral compass of UK lawmakers is being subverted by the Just Stop Oil brigade and this isn't even anywhere near being a law. Quite what empowers the ASA to make such a ruling is a mystery to me.

What's ironic is that I neither watch television nor use buses, so I've only seen this advert due the the action of the ASA to ban it. Hmmm, I think I may just go out and buy a Hilux, because I am that easily influenced.

Edited by LunarOne on Wednesday 22 November 17:10

Gareth79

7,975 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
LunarOne said:
Quite what empowers the ASA to make such a ruling is a mystery to me.
They have no powers, it's a self-regulation body. They can only tell Toyota to not show it again. If a company refuses or does not respond they usually say they they will inform their members about it, who presumably agree to not show adverts ruled against, but it's not in any way illegal for the advert to be shown, or for anybody to show it.

Ling from Lings Cars published the full email chain regarding a complaint about a joke car on her website, and pointed out to them that she had no obligation to do anything they said:

https://www.lingscars.com/images/pdf/asa2.pdf


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 22 November 18:06

neilr

1,527 posts

269 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
It's a shame the ASA don't spend more time applying their own rules to adverts for booze, which let's be honest most of which just purvey the message 'hey kids, strong alcohols cool' instead of getting all nanny state over a very tame 4x4 ad.

XCP

17,123 posts

234 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
neilr said:
It's a shame the ASA don't spend more time applying their own rules to adverts for booze, which let's be honest most of which just purvey the message 'hey kids, strong alcohols cool' instead of getting all nanny state over a very tame 4x4 ad.
Only if the kids think that drinking with their parents is cool.

Derek Smith

46,331 posts

254 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
neilr said:
It's a shame the ASA don't spend more time applying their own rules to adverts for booze, which let's be honest most of which just purvey the message 'hey kids, strong alcohols cool' instead of getting all nanny state over a very tame 4x4 ad.
Not sure that's entirely correct.

I am on the ICO's email marketing list and one of the themes a few months ago was adverts aimed improperly at children. The ASA will follow its lead in such matters.

wyson

2,490 posts

110 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
Ling from Lings Cars published the full email chain regarding a complaint about a joke car on her website, and pointed out to them that she had no obligation to do anything they said:

https://www.lingscars.com/images/pdf/asa2.pdf


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 22 November 18:06
Lol, that chain is hilarious. Shame I missed that deal. I would have loved a Delorean on a 3+35 for £150 a month with 10k miles. What a bargain! rotate Would have modded it with a flux capacitor and hooked it up to the 1000 megawatt German lorry chargers being talked about in the “no one wants an ev” thread. biggrin

Edited by wyson on Wednesday 22 November 21:51

InitialDave

12,171 posts

125 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Toyota should just run this in response.

https://youtu.be/ZUNJd06iyWU

TonyRPH

13,117 posts

174 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
They have no powers, it's a self-regulation body. They can only tell Toyota to not show it again. If a company refuses or does not respond they usually say they they will inform their members about it, who presumably agree to not show adverts ruled against, but it's not in any way illegal for the advert to be shown, or for anybody to show it.

Ling from Lings Cars published the full email chain regarding a complaint about a joke car on her website, and pointed out to them that she had no obligation to do anything they said:

https://www.lingscars.com/images/pdf/asa2.pdf

Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 22 November 18:06
Hilarious. I trust you're not the Gareth mentioned in the email on page 31?

Cold

15,511 posts

96 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
FWiW, I've owned many Land Rover products over the years and participated in numerous organised off road events along with seeking out local green lanes with a couple of mates in the past. I enjoy owning my 4x4s.

I agree with the ASA ruling. The Toyota advert goes against the "Tread Lightly" mantra instilled in UK off roading. Encouraging or even suggesting that it's ok for such large numbers of vehicles to rip up the dirt all together in one go isn't exactly responsible especially with how UK off roading is constantly under scrutiny with many interested parties wanting to restrict access to 4x4s.

Yes, I get that the imagery is supposed to be reminiscent of a wildebeest (or similar) herd all running together but highlighting more than handful of cars going out in convoy and at fast speeds is never going to be good for the countryside.

Travel as slow as possible but as fast as necessary. Take only photographs, leave only footprints.

Snow and Rocks

Original Poster:

2,303 posts

33 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
Each to their own but I disagree entirely, adverts aren't real and I no more expect to be able to tear around the UK en masse in my Hilux than I expect an army of women to chase me around when I spray on some Linx Africa or open a can of Diet Coke.

You can tell by my dated references that I don't watch much TV these days but what's next, Bond banned for breaking the speed limit?

Dumbing everything down to the point that you can portray messaging that is approved by the authorities really does set a worrying precedent especially when the motives of those complaining are blatantly malicious.

Somewhatfoolish

4,572 posts

192 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
The ASA have always been run by bloody nuts.

Nothing stopping you wanting to apply to be on their council though. Sounds easy enough. https://www.asa.org.uk/about-asa-and-cap/people/as...

It is incredibly amusing to think that someone believes that "Collectively, the members offer a wide range of skills and experiences, representing the perspectives of a wide cross section of society, including young people, families, charities and consumer groups."

TGCOTF-dewey

5,700 posts

61 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
They have no powers, it's a self-regulation body. They can only tell Toyota to not show it again. If a company refuses or does not respond they usually say they they will inform their members about it, who presumably agree to not show adverts ruled against, but it's not in any way illegal for the advert to be shown, or for anybody to show it.

Ling from Lings Cars published the full email chain regarding a complaint about a joke car on her website, and pointed out to them that she had no obligation to do anything they said:

https://www.lingscars.com/images/pdf/asa2.pdf


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 22 November 18:06
Thanks for posting that. A very entertaining read laugh

TorqueVR

1,854 posts

205 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Gareth79 said:
They have no powers, it's a self-regulation body. They can only tell Toyota to not show it again. If a company refuses or does not respond they usually say they they will inform their members about it, who presumably agree to not show adverts ruled against, but it's not in any way illegal for the advert to be shown, or for anybody to show it.

Ling from Lings Cars published the full email chain regarding a complaint about a joke car on her website, and pointed out to them that she had no obligation to do anything they said:

https://www.lingscars.com/images/pdf/asa2.pdf


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 22 November 18:06
Thanks for posting that. A very entertaining read laugh
Not as entertaining as Dave's post, bl***y hilarious
https://youtu.be/ZUNJd06iyWU

768

14,852 posts

102 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
What's wrong with off-road driving? Is laying tarmac everywhere more eco-friendly? Why can't we be exposed to this stuff?

confused


superlightr

12,899 posts

269 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
really good advert.

slevin911

650 posts

182 months

Thursday 23rd November 2023
quotequote all
Iirc the ad for the gt86 was banned too.