Air Quality on the London Underground

Air Quality on the London Underground

Author
Discussion

highway

Original Poster:

2,018 posts

266 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
I don’t use the tube much. When I have to, my journey starts on the Northern Line. It’s always been the case that blowing your nose, following a tube journey reveals black ‘soot’ or similar on the tissue.
Recent studies have shown that there are likely particulates present in the air on the tube which air quality testing may not detect.
Why is there no debate or apparent interest in the air quality people are exposed to when travelling on the tube?
Given the current furore over ULEZ this is surely topical?

fido

17,213 posts

261 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
The volume levels from track noise is pretty unbearable on parts of the network as well.

the-photographer

3,812 posts

182 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all

highway

Original Poster:

2,018 posts

266 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Given the Mayors concern for the quality of London’s air I’m surprised he is so quiet about this.

Blue62

9,304 posts

158 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
highway said:
Given the Mayors concern for the quality of London’s air I’m surprised he is so quiet about this.
He’s not been quiet, recently stating that air quality in the underground system is within H&S guidelines, nevertheless he’s asked TfL to look at ways to improve the air quality. His claim was contradicted by a study conducted in 2022 by a group of academics, experts eh?

colin_p

4,503 posts

218 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
highway said:
Given the Mayors concern for the quality of London’s air I’m surprised he is so quiet about this.
Taxing each tube train £12.50 a day wouldn't raise much dosh.

He is probably dreaming up a new scam of taxing each passenger an additional 'pollution' levy of £12.50 in addition to the fare because it is all the passenger's fault, obviously.



Mojooo

12,976 posts

186 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Sometimes you don't ask questions because you won't like the answer.


Part of the solution may be cleaning an entire line 9track/trains) down for a long period (say 3 months) while they give everything a deep clean. Would that be acceptable?


Getragdogleg

9,042 posts

189 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Just spent a day riding round all over the place, various lines, and I can safely say that its got a lot worse since i was left 10 years ago.

The Bakerloo seems to be hotter than Hades now, it was always warm but by gods its like a lava tube now, and the dust and crap that I was snotting out for the rest of the day was biblical.

Way worse than I remember it.

Panamax

4,812 posts

40 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Strange, isn't it? Drivers are down there all the time and don't seem to complain.

Insofar as the staff go on strike pretty regularly and have just announced more strikes next month has anyone spotted air quality amongst their demands?

Getragdogleg

9,042 posts

189 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Panamax said:
Strange, isn't it? Drivers are down there all the time and don't seem to complain.

Insofar as the staff go on strike pretty regularly and have just announced more strikes next month has anyone spotted air quality amongst their demands?
Frogs in water being brought slowly to the boil, you get used to it if it heats up over a long time, Mind you they are at the front on their own and not in the carriage with all the crowds.

I used to ride the tubes all the time and haven't for 10+ years, I was amazed at how much hotter it is.

Have the braking compounds changed so they are softer and generate more dust ?

Yertis

18,554 posts

272 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
Just spent a day riding round all over the place, various lines, and I can safely say that its got a lot worse since i was left 10 years ago.

The Bakerloo seems to be hotter than Hades now, it was always warm but by gods its like a lava tube now, and the dust and crap that I was snotting out for the rest of the day was biblical.

Way worse than I remember it.
By what mechanism do you think it has become hotter?

I’m pretty sure air down there is cleaner than it used to be. For starters, nobody smokes. I certainly don’t get the black snot like I used to in ‘80s.

James6112

5,229 posts

34 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
colin_p said:
highway said:
Given the Mayors concern for the quality of London’s air I’m surprised he is so quiet about this.
Taxing each tube train £12.50 a day wouldn't raise much dosh.

He is probably dreaming up a new scam of taxing each passenger an additional 'pollution' levy of £12.50 in addition to the fare because it is all the passenger's fault, obviously.
It’s easier to improve air quality via ulez.
Not a scam. Measurable benefits.

The tube is totally unrelated, i’m sure it’s being looked at.

JagLover

43,583 posts

241 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
Yertis said:
By what mechanism do you think it has become hotter?

I’m pretty sure air down there is cleaner than it used to be. For starters, nobody smokes. I certainly don’t get the black snot like I used to in ‘80s.
The older deep lines have been getting steadily hotter since they were built. There is inadequate ventilation.

ambuletz

10,904 posts

187 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
I rarely use the central line but when i do the noise is unbearable, even when i have in-ear headphones it's just far too loud. I don't remember it being this loud a decade or 2 ago. Before you could at least shout in conversation to someone, now you just give up and talk only when it's stopped at stations.

toastyhamster

1,702 posts

102 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Yertis said:
By what mechanism do you think it has become hotter?

I’m pretty sure air down there is cleaner than it used to be. For starters, nobody smokes. I certainly don’t get the black snot like I used to in ‘80s.
The older deep lines have been getting steadily hotter since they were built. There is inadequate ventilation.
I did not know that, every day a school day etc. I live oop North and no longer have a daily trip into the City, I don't miss it one bit. I do go down occasionally but have to admit hadn't noticed it getting hotter. Wiki has an article on why:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_c...

Getragdogleg

9,042 posts

189 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Yertis said:
By what mechanism do you think it has become hotter?

I’m pretty sure air down there is cleaner than it used to be. For starters, nobody smokes. I certainly don’t get the black snot like I used to in ‘80s.
The older deep lines have been getting steadily hotter since they were built. There is inadequate ventilation.
Coupled with the fact that London is built on top of Clay, Clay acts as an insulator and much of the heat from the Tube system goes into the clay and quite a bit of the heat remains there.

Braking, friction, heat from Motors and of course people all heat the tunnels up and over the course of years the system gets hotter.

I noticed how hot it was by going in the tube, riding several lines and the mechanism by which I think its got hotter is by thinking "fk me, its bd hot and stuffy in here, I don't recall it being this bad when I did it all the time".

The Bakerloo being one of the worst because it has not got many exits to the outside world like other lines that sometimes emerge into the open air.



audidoody

8,597 posts

262 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
James6112 said:
It’s easier to improve air quality via ulez.
Not a scam. Measurable benefits.

The tube is totally unrelated, i’m sure it’s being looked at.
Given that: every taxed car is either Euro 6 (diesel) or has an MoT emissions certificate, that paying Khan £12.50 a day doesn't convert exhaust gases into pure mountain air, and that Imperial College says ULEZ makes no difference to air quality, how is ULEZ not a scam?

audidoody

8,597 posts

262 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
James6112 said:
It’s easier to improve air quality via ulez.
Not a scam. Measurable benefits.

The tube is totally unrelated, i’m sure it’s being looked at.
Given that: every taxed car is either Euro 6 (diesel) or has an MoT emissions certificate, that paying Khan £12.50 a day doesn't convert exhaust gases into pure mountain air, and that Imperial College says ULEZ makes no difference to air quality, how is ULEZ not a scam?

audidoody

8,597 posts

262 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
James6112 said:
It’s easier to improve air quality via ulez.
Not a scam. Measurable benefits.

The tube is totally unrelated, i’m sure it’s being looked at.
Given that: every taxed car is either Euro 6 (diesel) or has an MoT emissions certificate, that paying Khan £12.50 a day doesn't convert exhaust gases into pure mountain air, and that Imperial College says ULEZ makes no difference to air quality, how is ULEZ not a scam?

turbobloke

106,899 posts

266 months

Monday 28th August 2023
quotequote all
audidoody said:
James6112 said:
It’s easier to improve air quality via ulez.
Not a scam. Measurable benefits.

The tube is totally unrelated, i’m sure it’s being looked at.
Given that: every taxed car is either Euro 6 (diesel) or has an MoT emissions certificate, that paying Khan £12.50 a day doesn't convert exhaust gases into pure mountain air, and that Imperial College says ULEZ makes no difference to air quality, how is ULEZ not a scam?
It's about money all the way.