Two die in flooded car in Liverpool.
Discussion
Happened over the weekend and when I first heard about it I presumed that the car had been swept away.
But it had just got stuck in a flooded road under a bridge.
It's quite a dip and according to witnesses the water was 15ft deep, well enough to cover the car.
Thankfully I've never been in that situation but it beggars belief how it could have become so tragic.
Either they tried to drive through the already flooded water or were stuck as the water rose, but there must have been so much time to do something
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-666...
But it had just got stuck in a flooded road under a bridge.
It's quite a dip and according to witnesses the water was 15ft deep, well enough to cover the car.
Thankfully I've never been in that situation but it beggars belief how it could have become so tragic.
Either they tried to drive through the already flooded water or were stuck as the water rose, but there must have been so much time to do something
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-666...
Was just reading this - very sad.
It reminded me of a situation I was in when I was 19, passenger in an MG ZR that, long story short, ended up on its drivers side on fire.
I pulled on the passenger door handle which was the only accessible door, the handle came off.
The car also dead bolted itself whilst driving and the impact must have disconnected the electrics - the door stayed bolted shut from the outside - our friends could not open it.
We had been kicking the windscreen to no avail also , it just kept cracking and stretching but we couldn’t kick it out from the angle we were situated.
Luckily a friend put his elbow through the passenger door window and smashed it, and we got out. 2 minutes later the car was completely gone.
A different situation but perhaps similar reasons.
I wonder if the doors were locked and could not be unlocked or perhaps opened due to the water pressure, perhaps the windows had stopped operating as they weren’t opened quick enough before the electrics died?
Tragic.
It reminded me of a situation I was in when I was 19, passenger in an MG ZR that, long story short, ended up on its drivers side on fire.
I pulled on the passenger door handle which was the only accessible door, the handle came off.
The car also dead bolted itself whilst driving and the impact must have disconnected the electrics - the door stayed bolted shut from the outside - our friends could not open it.
We had been kicking the windscreen to no avail also , it just kept cracking and stretching but we couldn’t kick it out from the angle we were situated.
Luckily a friend put his elbow through the passenger door window and smashed it, and we got out. 2 minutes later the car was completely gone.
A different situation but perhaps similar reasons.
I wonder if the doors were locked and could not be unlocked or perhaps opened due to the water pressure, perhaps the windows had stopped operating as they weren’t opened quick enough before the electrics died?
Tragic.
Problem with electric everything. I would be happier with wind down windows in my car but everyone is a feeble lazy ass nowadays.
The only time a lot of people use their muscles is at the gym.
Surely door locks should spring open and you could get out once water level has gone up above your eyeballs in the car.
Bad move to try and driver through.So may people do this when confronted with water. They probably stalled and just sat there rather than jump out right away.
Guess you dont expect this sort of thing in the middle of town and the delay was fatal.
The only time a lot of people use their muscles is at the gym.
Surely door locks should spring open and you could get out once water level has gone up above your eyeballs in the car.
Bad move to try and driver through.So may people do this when confronted with water. They probably stalled and just sat there rather than jump out right away.
Guess you dont expect this sort of thing in the middle of town and the delay was fatal.
I go through the dip a dozen times a week, what is puzzling me is why did they continue driving towards it.
From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Fundoreen said:
Problem with electric everything. I would be happier with wind down windows in my car but everyone is a feeble lazy ass nowadays.
The only time a lot of people use their muscles is at the gym.
Surely door locks should spring open and you could get out once water level has gone up above your eyeballs in the car.
Bad move to try and driver through.So may people do this when confronted with water. They probably stalled and just sat there rather than jump out right away.
Guess you dont expect this sort of thing in the middle of town and the delay was fatal.
I remember the advice used to be that you should let the water fill the car up so the pressure equalises and then try to get out.The only time a lot of people use their muscles is at the gym.
Surely door locks should spring open and you could get out once water level has gone up above your eyeballs in the car.
Bad move to try and driver through.So may people do this when confronted with water. They probably stalled and just sat there rather than jump out right away.
Guess you dont expect this sort of thing in the middle of town and the delay was fatal.
A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
donkmeister said:
I remember the advice used to be that you should let the water fill the car up so the pressure equalises and then try to get out.
A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
I remember that. Took a long, long time for the pressure to equalise... far longer than anyone who isn't a professional free diver could hold their breath.A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
donkmeister said:
I remember the advice used to be that you should let the water fill the car up so the pressure equalises and then try to get out.
A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
Yup, heard the same, seen the same. I've told our kids, if you ever find yourself in that situation, don't fk about waiting for whatever, just get the fk out of there, immediately! A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
waynedear said:
I go through the dip a dozen times a week, what is puzzling me is why did they continue driving towards it.
From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Although most of Queens Drive is a major road, the part of it where this occured is a off the main route and I suppose it they were driving along without any other reference points it'd quite easy to just drive into the water - and as it was raining very heavily then visibility would be reduced. By the time you realised, it'd be too late.From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
On deadlocks - I thought it was a thing with Merc (it certainly used to be, I had one) that they wouldn't fit deadlocks for precisely the reason that they can prevent escape. Although I didn't think deadlocks were supposed to engage if the car is locked from inside (or automatically) anyway?
waynedear said:
I go through the dip a dozen times a week, what is puzzling me is why did they continue driving towards it.
From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Unfamiliar to area, heavy rain disorientated them and possibly age?From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Hugo Stiglitz said:
waynedear said:
I go through the dip a dozen times a week, what is puzzling me is why did they continue driving towards it.
From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Unfamiliar to area, heavy rain disorientated them and possibly age?From either side you can see you are going downhill then uphill, if the water was 15' deep it would be not far from reaching the bridge, meaning it has to be way back up either side of the road, they would have hit it before it got deep.
Previous said:
donkmeister said:
I remember the advice used to be that you should let the water fill the car up so the pressure equalises and then try to get out.
A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
I remember that. Took a long, long time for the pressure to equalise... far longer than anyone who isn't a professional free diver could hold their breath.A car programme tested this out years ago with scuba gear and found it was complete rubbish, and you were better off getting out as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, plenty of people out there drive modern cars with the 1963 edition of the AA Book Of The Car burned into their consciousness.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff