Dan Wootton

[robscot]

This tweet has had 3 million views, or 3x the number of people who buy The Sun today.

https://twitter.com/rubytrubes/status/167924080031...

The thread is eye opening!

[dukeboy749r]

Karma

[Rivenink]

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

[GroundEffect]

Those who protest the most at windmills usually have the most to hide.

[Horsey McHorseface]

GroundEffect said:

Those who protest the most at windmills usually have the most to hide.

So true. Odious character.

[NerveAgent]

It’s ok bhie, no one saw that

[bitchstewie]

I don't often fall for fake tweets but I honestly just didn't spot that it wasn't the actual GB News Twitter account.

What can I say I got rinsed

[robscot]

Rivenink said:

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

Appears you were accurate.

[Rivenink]

robscot said:

Rivenink said:

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

Appears you were accurate.

Same with the "The Email" thread.

Serious allegations. Curiously no-one ranting about nonces and perverts and such.

[Dingu]

Rivenink said:

robscot said:

Rivenink said:

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

Appears you were accurate.

Same with the "The Email" thread.

Serious allegations. Curiously no-one ranting about nonces and perverts and such.

Selective moral outrage on PH?! Knock me down with a feather.

[poo at Paul's]

Rivenink said:

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

Sort of correct though, as most people (*me included), have no idea who that chap is, and care even less!

Edwards is somewhat of a Leviathan in broadcasting, this lad is one of the Borrowers!

The luvvies will try to push this story and make it "trend" and 99% of the country will not care, as they wont ever see it, or see it but think "huh" as he is a complete nobody.

[Chicken Chaser]

Sounds like a character. I've seen enough of him on trash TV to know who he is. Hope the police pay him a visit about his escapades and kudos to the guy putting it out.

[Dingu]

poo at Paul's said:

Rivenink said:

Not the BBC... move along, nothing to see here.


/s

Sort of correct though, as most people (*me included), have no idea who that chap is, and care even less!

Edwards is somewhat of a Leviathan in broadcasting, this lad is one of the Borrowers!

The luvvies will try to push this story and make it "trend" and 99% of the country will not care, as they wont ever see it, or see it but think "huh" as he is a complete nobody.

At least you admit to indefensible double standards I guess.

Wootten is one of a string of Sun journalists of questionable backgrounds when it comes to their behaviour. Like the other one who admitted he would try it on with year 10s if a teacher.

[poo at Paul's]

Rivenink said:

Same with the "The Email" thread.

Serious allegations. Curiously no-one ranting about nonces and perverts and such.

Well, the "Email" was just the incoherent riddle ramblings of some obvious nut job, that no one took even vaguely seriously due to the method it was delivered and how poorly it was written.
If there is any truth in any of it, the author needs to seriously work on their delivery or everyone will just dismiss it as mental.

[robscot]

poo at Paul's said:

The luvvies will try to push this story

What does that actually mean?

Have you read the contents of the allegations made?

[poo at Paul's]

Dingu said:

At least you admit to indefensible double standards I guess.

Wootten is one of a string of Sun journalists of questionable backgrounds when it comes to their behaviour. Like the other one who admitted he would try it on with year 10s if a teacher.

It’s not double standard and is absolutely defensible.
No one knows who he is, you may do, if you watch him, but he’s not in the same league as anyone north of Thomas Shafernaker on the BBC, as I am sure his viewing figures will confirm.

If there was a tweet about a guy living in a terrace house in Walthamstow who’s a massive fraudster, pervert or nonce, the people, that would care would be limited to his neighbours and his victims.

Thanks for explaining who he is, I’ve never heard of him til this thread, and I bet I’m not alone!

[poo at Paul's]

robscot said:

poo at Paul's said:

The luvvies will try to push this story

What does that actually mean?

Which of the 7 words don’t you understand? It seems to be comprehensible to me.

[Countdown]

poo at Paul's said:

Sort of correct though, as most people (*me included), have no idea who that chap is, and care even less!

Edwards is somewhat of a Leviathan in broadcasting, this lad is one of the Borrowers!

The luvvies will try to push this story and make it "trend" and 99% of the country will not care, as they wont ever see it, or see it but think "huh" as he is a complete nobody.

Don't you think it's a bit hypocritical of his Employers to effectively hide what he did and protect him whilst throwing lots of insinuations/accusations towards HE?

[Countdown]

poo at Paul's said:

robscot said:

poo at Paul's said:

The luvvies will try to push this story

What does that actually mean?

Which of the 7 words don’t you understand? It seems to be comprehensible to me.

Not really. Who do you define as the "Luvvies" and why do you think they will "try to push the story"?

It seems like you resent anybody publicising this, possibly because it shows what a bunch of hypocrites News International are.

[eldar]

poo at Paul's said:

robscot said:

poo at Paul's said:

The luvvies will try to push this story

What does that actually mean?

Which of the 7 words don’t you understand? It seems to be comprehensible to me.

Can't you count to 8. Thats all your fingers.