The BBC will means test you
Discussion
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66140890
I can’t see this ever flying, but this seems faintly ludicrous. Hopefully it’s just a “thinking out loud” type of article but the notion of being told to pay more for a TV and Radio service because you’re well off doesn’t sit well.
I can’t see this ever flying, but this seems faintly ludicrous. Hopefully it’s just a “thinking out loud” type of article but the notion of being told to pay more for a TV and Radio service because you’re well off doesn’t sit well.
I had to check that it wasn’t April 1st when I read this.
I am getting increasingly peed off that every way we look there is an argument that those that pay the most should pay even more.
The idea that a service like this should be charged based on your ability to pay is frankly absurd but it does seem to be everywhere now.
What next - adjust the price of a pint based on how much you get paid. It’s hard not to think that the idea a government digital currency enables exactly this kind of crazy logic.
I am getting increasingly peed off that every way we look there is an argument that those that pay the most should pay even more.
The idea that a service like this should be charged based on your ability to pay is frankly absurd but it does seem to be everywhere now.
What next - adjust the price of a pint based on how much you get paid. It’s hard not to think that the idea a government digital currency enables exactly this kind of crazy logic.
Biggy Stardust said:
munroman said:
don't pay the BBC tax, which is regressive.
Note that it also unfairly penalises women, apparently. I'm only surprised that it wasn't unfair to various minorities too.All someone needs to do is produce a study that the licence fee affects minorities adversely, and it will be dropped quicker than a presenter caught buying under age porn.
Or, it will be charged based on your cultures' past oppression of minorities.
So could go either way I suppose.
Suddenly a flat rate doesn't seem all that bad.
Or, it will be charged based on your cultures' past oppression of minorities.
So could go either way I suppose.
Suddenly a flat rate doesn't seem all that bad.
Recent news about the easyjet flight that couldnt take off till passengers got off comes to mind.
Why am I paying extra if my hand luggage is 0.05kg over when some barrage balloon behind me gets the same price flight?
Paying extra would encourage them to lose weight.
I doubt someone paying a bit extra for tvl would try and get poor.
Oi mr prime minister,yes you Richi ,sort this one out for more votes!
Why am I paying extra if my hand luggage is 0.05kg over when some barrage balloon behind me gets the same price flight?
Paying extra would encourage them to lose weight.
I doubt someone paying a bit extra for tvl would try and get poor.
Oi mr prime minister,yes you Richi ,sort this one out for more votes!
bhstewie said:
That doesn't seem like it's "the BBC will means test you" or have I misunderstood what Sharp said?
It's certainly more than that - ex BBC chap, with good judgement as per the Boris Johnson loan, wants more pie in the sky for his former work chums as his political chums work on removing the BBC's archaic funding model. Conflicted? It's a hard hard life.captain_cynic said:
bhstewie said:
So the former chairman suggests one way the BBC could change their license model.
That doesn't seem like it's "the BBC will means test you" or have I misunderstood what Sharp said?
No, but don't bring fact and reason into this froth fest.That doesn't seem like it's "the BBC will means test you" or have I misunderstood what Sharp said?
Form an orderly queue to defend a Boris loan dude rich Tory donor brexiteer
Elephant invisible again, that was a daft thing in haste, visible Charter review is linked but separate apparently.
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/170/com...
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/170/com...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff