The 23 million dollar w**k

Author
Discussion

Ari

Original Poster:

19,542 posts

222 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
The word 'accidentally' doing a LOT of heavy lifting there I suspect! biggrin

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/06/15/wa...

Edited by Ari on Friday 16th June 10:00

ATG

21,379 posts

279 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
It's a little hard to see how his behaviour caused her $30MM of damage. It's almost like US litigation is nuts.

ScotHill

3,535 posts

116 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
There but for the grace of God come I.

JagLover

43,835 posts

242 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
ATG said:
It's a little hard to see how his behaviour caused her $30MM of damage. It's almost like US litigation is nuts.
If it is as reported, which seems to be leaving the camera on accidentally while doing some "private time", then it does seem nuts. It can only really be understood in the hypersensitivity following "me-too".

Previous

1,505 posts

161 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
I believe its called "the money shot".


Catastrophic Poo

5,192 posts

193 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
ATG said:
It's a little hard to see how his behaviour caused her $30MM of damage. It's almost like US litigation is nuts.
When you’re from Dell money, well….

Petrus1983

9,825 posts

169 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Ridiculous - she could have just turned off the screen. How has it damaged her reputation at all - apart from being a little perv and carried on watching.

Non paywall -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12200523/...

Ari

Original Poster:

19,542 posts

222 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
ATG said:
It's a little hard to see how his behaviour caused her $30MM of damage. It's almost like US litigation is nuts.
Precisely my thinking. It's almost as though they based it on how much money was available to be doled out rather than actual damage.

Murph7355

38,948 posts

263 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Previous said:
I believe its called "the money shot".
biggrin

J4CKO

42,894 posts

207 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
"Ball Street wker"

For 30 million dollars, I would watch biggrin

That is a ridiculous, even if he was being a pervert and did it on purpose, but if it was a mistake it seems extremely punitive.

More money than most people ever see in a lifetime times several because they saw someone bashing one out ? Has that person never seen a penis, seems hypocritical and if they are in a heterosexual relationship that involves sex, he should be reprimanded and pay something but 23 million quid, jesus, world gone mad.

My tip, tape over the camera or make sure its unplugged wink

bitchstewie

55,283 posts

217 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Love how the Telegraph are framing this as a "working from home blunder".

Mr Whippy

29,950 posts

248 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Not for this specific reason, but my microphone and camera are on a laptop which is bagged away unless I use it specifically for this kind of rubbish meetings/discussing stuff/sharing screens.

To have cameras and microphones on and possibly running inside your office, with other people possibly accidentally looking/listening in, is a bit iffy for so so so many reasons.


FourWheelDrift

89,649 posts

291 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
ATG said:
It's a little hard to see how his behaviour caused her $30MM of damage. It's almost like US litigation is nuts.
Dell = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


Glade

4,320 posts

230 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Yeah I just employ the "no wking with with the work computer on" tactic, usually.

Radec

4,412 posts

54 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Found the footage smile


ScotHill

3,535 posts

116 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
The Kids In The Hall have an amazing sketch about this if anyone has Amazon Prime, the last sketch of new S1E2, make sure you watch the whole thing. smile

Carl_Manchester

13,204 posts

269 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
ScotHill said:
There but for the grace of God come I.
bravo , have a hehe

biggbn

24,979 posts

227 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Carl_Manchester said:
ScotHill said:
There but for the grace of God come I.
bravo , have a hehe
And another. Kudos

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

232 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Petrus1983 said:
Ridiculous - she could have just turned off the screen. How has it damaged her reputation at all - apart from being a little perv and carried on watching.

Non paywall -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12200523/...
Indeed.

[DAILYMAIL]: Father-of-one Dell reached an 'multi-million dollar' agreement and paid out to the woman. But the settlement was 'much smaller' than her suggested $30million, according to the report. Senior executives at Goldman Sachs believed that if the woman was so traumatized by the explicit video, she could have simply stopped watching, according to Bloomberg's sources who described their reactions.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

232 months

Friday 16th June 2023
quotequote all
Radec said:
Found the footage smile

If that’s legit, then that’s career/reputation ending stuff right there.