Consciously uncoupling in Court (Paltrow ski trial)
Discussion
Can't see a thread about the latest narcissistic actor / actress luvvie getting off on watching themselves in court.
Reckon this one (can't remember her name) could get interesting.
She says he ran into her temple like body and violated her.
He says that she ran into him resulting in a head injury and 4 cracked ribs.
Reckon this one (can't remember her name) could get interesting.
She says he ran into her temple like body and violated her.
He says that she ran into him resulting in a head injury and 4 cracked ribs.
They're both accusing each other of being the one that crashed in to them. Therefore, what did the witnesses see, if there were any witnesses? Strikes me that they're both on a hiding to nothing and GP will end up paying the bloke to go away, without making an admission of guilt, just so she can get on with her life. That's if the bloke doesn't run out of money first.
Didn't GP at one point (or her lawyer) claim that the guy had deliberately crashed into her, between her legs and make grunting noises, something she had to retract in court saying he didn't sexually assault her...
Ah it was her
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rm8bKs4zSA
Ah it was her
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rm8bKs4zSA
Dogwatch said:
I don't understand why he appears to have had injuries worthy of a car crash while she was apparently unscathed. According to reports it was three years before he got around to seeing a lawyer.which seems odd.
If she was the one to crash into the back of him then she'd see it and be prepared for what was going to happen, he'd be unexpectedly taken out and it tends to be a case of your legs are wiped out and you're thrown unexpectedly onto your back without getting your hands down to cushion the landing and stop your head hitting the ground hard. I don't see why there's so much back and forth on this when other witnesses would be able to say what happened (unless it was either because it took so long to go to court or because there were none). Basically the main question is who was uphill.
Well no wonder I couldn’t find it, what an obscure thread title! 
What an utterly batst load of bks this is all about!
Just bizarre.
8k a day for a ski instructor, allegations of having skis between her and a grunting man pressing up behind her, then spooning her in the snow!
Asked what she had lost, as she’s counter suing for a dollar, ‘well, we lost half a day of skiing’!
Him describing a ‘blood curdling scream’ and another persona now living in his head, blaming the crash in him splitting with his missus!
Mental!
What an utterly batst load of bks this is all about!
Just bizarre.
8k a day for a ski instructor, allegations of having skis between her and a grunting man pressing up behind her, then spooning her in the snow!
Asked what she had lost, as she’s counter suing for a dollar, ‘well, we lost half a day of skiing’!
Him describing a ‘blood curdling scream’ and another persona now living in his head, blaming the crash in him splitting with his missus!
Mental!
Byker28i said:
Didn't GP at one point (or her lawyer) claim that the guy had deliberately crashed into her, between her legs and make grunting noises, something she had to retract in court saying he didn't sexually assault her...
Ah it was her
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rm8bKs4zSA
There are candles available, cheaper than a ski resort Ah it was her
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rm8bKs4zSA
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff