Double Standards in Sexual Assault case?
Discussion
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/celebrity/...
If TLDR, woman football fan gropes man's genitals and rubs her arse on his shoulder and gets community order. sentence is one thing, Judges comments quite another!
If TLDR, woman football fan gropes man's genitals and rubs her arse on his shoulder and gets community order. sentence is one thing, Judges comments quite another!
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
...was the victim in this case not vulnerable, ..how do you know that?I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
So essentially you are considering men as a lesser victim than women.I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
No wonder male victims of domestic violence have trouble being taken seriously.
I've been victim of sexual assaults by females a number of times. Being old bill and working busy night time economy shifts surrounded by drunk people and having to go in and out of clubs it's rife. Women grabbing my arse, cock and balls, inappropriate comments the lot.
Imagine if it was drunken blokes doing it to a female, I locked one of them up but pretty much got told to forget it, it's a drunken female and it goes with the territory for a bloke in uniform.....so no one cared.
I'm sure I'll get all the PH Alphas piling in about looking a gift horse in the mouth now though!
Imagine if it was drunken blokes doing it to a female, I locked one of them up but pretty much got told to forget it, it's a drunken female and it goes with the territory for a bloke in uniform.....so no one cared.
I'm sure I'll get all the PH Alphas piling in about looking a gift horse in the mouth now though!
Rufus Stone said:
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
So essentially you are considering men as a lesser victim than women.I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
No wonder male victims of domestic violence have trouble being taken seriously.
Lotobear said:
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
...was the victim in this case not vulnerable, ..how do you know that?I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
You really think if a man gropes a woman’s genitals in public he’s not going to get a harsher sentence than this woman got? I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
Rufus Stone said:
xstian said:
This is not domestic violence though is it? So what relevance does that have to do with this case?
No it's not, but your attitude to male victims would presumably equally apply.BoRED S2upid said:
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
You really think if a man gropes a woman’s genitals in public he’s not going to get a harsher sentence than this woman got? I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
BoRED S2upid said:
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
You really think if a man gropes a woman’s genitals in public he’s not going to get a harsher sentence than this woman got? I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
https://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/999/man-who-g...
https://www.wiltshirelive.co.uk/news/wiltshire-new...
xstian said:
BoRED S2upid said:
xstian said:
The details in the article are a bit light, but a community order sounds about right. I really don't think if a man did the same he would have got prison time.
I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
You really think if a man gropes a woman’s genitals in public he’s not going to get a harsher sentence than this woman got? I'm quite surprised some can't see the difference between this case and a man committing the same offence. I think you have got to remember the crime committed here is the same if it committed by a man or woman, no question about that, but who its done to make a big difference. The vulnerability of the victim has a massive impact on the seriousness of a crime. If she had done this to a male child, you would expect a harsher sentence. If a man had done this to a woman, grabbed her genitals and said I'm going to have sex with you later, what would you take that to mean?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff