Nick Clegg took bribes?
Discussion
In a court filing, Meta VPs Nick Clegg and Nicola Mendelsohn, and Cristian Perrella (trust & safety director) have been "inadvertently" identified in court as the individuals accused of taking bribes from OnlyFans in a lawsuit filed by adult entertainers.
An attorney representing the OnlyFans parent company (Fenix Internet, LCC) and its owner (Leonid Radvinsky) filed a petition today to delete an "incorrectly filed document" containing "confidential information" that was "inadvertently unredacted."
Meta have responded saying the allegations "lack facts, merit, or anything that would make them plausible. The allegations are baseless."
https://gizmodo.com/clegg-meta-executives-identifi...
This is in the lawsuit where OnlyFans are accused of getting their competitors blacklisted
An attorney representing the OnlyFans parent company (Fenix Internet, LCC) and its owner (Leonid Radvinsky) filed a petition today to delete an "incorrectly filed document" containing "confidential information" that was "inadvertently unredacted."
Meta have responded saying the allegations "lack facts, merit, or anything that would make them plausible. The allegations are baseless."
https://gizmodo.com/clegg-meta-executives-identifi...
This is in the lawsuit where OnlyFans are accused of getting their competitors blacklisted
Claims that Clegg has a secret trust account in the Philippines in the name of his son
https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/status/158027654...
https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/status/158027654...
Piggies love troughs. No surprise. He just got caught, that's all.
My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
Digga said:
Piggies love troughs. No surprise. He just got caught, that's all.
My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
+1 (with many zeroes!).My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
Digga said:
Piggies love troughs. No surprise. He just got caught, that's all.
My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
How did you manage to get the EU into a conversation that had nothing to do with it. Obsessed much?My overall objection to the EU was that having (paying for) as few politicians as possible is a generally desirable thing. That less of them means fewer opportunities from things to be corrupted and skimmed also follows.
People need to wake up to the fact there is no political party free of this.
I'll give lots of zeroes but there'll be no plus one in front.
" less of them" nope, don't agree.
I don't really give a stuff about Clegg but agree that he's an opportunist. Aren't we all? But picking out a single person as an excuse for political change is what authoritarians rather than authoritative do.
Byker28i said:
In a court filing, Meta VPs Nick Clegg and Nicola Mendelsohn, and Cristian Perrella (trust & safety director) have been "inadvertently" identified in court as the individuals accused of taking bribes from OnlyFans in a lawsuit filed by adult entertainers.
An attorney representing the OnlyFans parent company (Fenix Internet, LCC) and its owner (Leonid Radvinsky) filed a petition today to delete an "incorrectly filed document" containing "confidential information" that was "inadvertently unredacted."
Meta have responded saying the allegations "lack facts, merit, or anything that would make them plausible. The allegations are baseless."
https://gizmodo.com/clegg-meta-executives-identifi...
This is in the lawsuit where OnlyFans are accused of getting their competitors blacklisted
I think it's BS.An attorney representing the OnlyFans parent company (Fenix Internet, LCC) and its owner (Leonid Radvinsky) filed a petition today to delete an "incorrectly filed document" containing "confidential information" that was "inadvertently unredacted."
Meta have responded saying the allegations "lack facts, merit, or anything that would make them plausible. The allegations are baseless."
https://gizmodo.com/clegg-meta-executives-identifi...
This is in the lawsuit where OnlyFans are accused of getting their competitors blacklisted
deadslow said:
Earthdweller said:
Countdown said:
I think it's BS.
Maybe, maybe not But Clegg doesn’t seem to have many principles and his morals seem easily bought
As I've said, they're all bent, so the fewer we pay for, the better. It's not just the UK either - just look at Gerhard Schröder.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff