Julian Assange loses extradition appeal at Supreme Court
Discussion
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18260914
"Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has lost his Supreme Court fight against extradition to Sweden to face accusations of sex offences.
The judgement was reached by a majority of five to two, the court's president, Lord Phillips, told the hearing.
Mr Assange's lawyers had asked the UK's highest court to block his removal, arguing that a European arrest warrant issued against him was "invalid".
But the court ruled the extradition request had been "lawfully made". "
"Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has lost his Supreme Court fight against extradition to Sweden to face accusations of sex offences.
The judgement was reached by a majority of five to two, the court's president, Lord Phillips, told the hearing.
Mr Assange's lawyers had asked the UK's highest court to block his removal, arguing that a European arrest warrant issued against him was "invalid".
But the court ruled the extradition request had been "lawfully made". "
Asterix said:
Jasandjules said:
AndrewW-G said:
Not surprised at this, with any luck, he'll be in solitary in the US, by the end of June
Why?Sheets Tabuer said:
Did I hear it correctly? The judge said if we take the English meaning of lawful institution it means a court or judge however if we take the French meaning it means any official body so we'll use their meaning and rule the extradition is lawful.
Apparently it all hangs on the translation from the original French.Why don't the Swedes just issue another warrant and avoid all this nonsense??
AndrewW-G said:
Asterix said:
Jasandjules said:
AndrewW-G said:
Not surprised at this, with any luck, he'll be in solitary in the US, by the end of June
Why?Also, if there is nothing to hide then there is nothing to fear... are we assuming he'll have a fair trial?
AndrewW-G said:
Asterix said:
Jasandjules said:
AndrewW-G said:
Not surprised at this, with any luck, he'll be in solitary in the US, by the end of June
Why?In fact screw it, I wanna kill anyone who looks at me cockeyed. Seems reasonable.
Edited by Marf on Wednesday 30th May 13:41
AndrewW-G said:
Assange and Wikileaks, like to put themselves forward in the press, as some sort of force for the greater good, seeking out truth and justice that has been hidden from the general public. . . . .Having met him, I can happily state that in my opinion he is a complete and utter sleaze, with similar morals to T.Blair and his sole interest isn't seeking truth, but is actually seeking fame, wealth and riches for J.Assange
I see.So having self interest is not sufficient to require extradition? How odd that you equate that to destroying a country and taking us to war unlawfully.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff