Stuntman falls to his death...
Discussion
Pretty shocking really, I'm not even sure a parachute would have saved him.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028640/Da...
The video at the bottom of the page shows the whole thing incase anyone doesn't realise it, personally I think the pictures show enough don't think the video needs to be there.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028640/Da...
The video at the bottom of the page shows the whole thing incase anyone doesn't realise it, personally I think the pictures show enough don't think the video needs to be there.
Jasandjules said:
Oh dear. Stunts are dangerous.
A shame for him and his family though.
And zollar, a parachute would be ok depending on the altitude he managed to open it at.
The drop was 200ft even if he had a cord fitted to plane and set to open if the cord was pulled out (similar to jet ski keys) would it have opened in time to slow him enough for him to survive?.A shame for him and his family though.
And zollar, a parachute would be ok depending on the altitude he managed to open it at.
ZOLLAR said:
The drop was 200ft even if he had a cord fitted to plane and set to open if the cord was pulled out (similar to jet ski keys) would it have opened in time to slow him enough for him to survive?.
100ft seems to be the absolute lowest limit.http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/may/15/this...
Muncher said:
ZOLLAR said:
The drop was 200ft even if he had a cord fitted to plane and set to open if the cord was pulled out (similar to jet ski keys) would it have opened in time to slow him enough for him to survive?.
100ft seems to be the absolute lowest limit.http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/may/15/this...
So I'm guessing then he would have survived had he worn a parachute?.
I'm no Health and safety officer but surely he should have been wearing one, to have no safety device in place is quite surprising especially in America.
ZOLLAR said:
Muncher said:
ZOLLAR said:
The drop was 200ft even if he had a cord fitted to plane and set to open if the cord was pulled out (similar to jet ski keys) would it have opened in time to slow him enough for him to survive?.
100ft seems to be the absolute lowest limit.http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/may/15/this...
So I'm guessing then he would have survived had he worn a parachute?.
I'm no Health and safety officer but surely he should have been wearing one, to have no safety device in place is quite surprising especially in America.
BliarOut said:
Surely it defeats the object of a dangerous stunt if it's not dangerous?
It still would be dangerous with a parachute but at least he wouldn't have died in front of hundreds of families!.Edit to add.
These stunts are meant to be exciting if he fell and survived that would be enough to shock and excite people, seeing someone die on a family day must be horrendous, don't get me wrong I'm not a "wrap everything and everyone in wool" sort of person I just think the stunt could have been done abit safer.
ZOLLAR said:
BliarOut said:
Surely it defeats the object of a dangerous stunt if it's not dangerous?
It still would be dangerous with a parachute but at least he wouldn't have died in front of hundreds of families!.There's a whole world of difference between someone doing something of this nature compared to an experienced and skilful aerobatic pilot or racing driver.
All are dangerous activities - but with driving and flying the skill factor is immense and obvious. What skill is required to crawl from an aeroplane to a helicopter? Nerve yes - skill no.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



tty way to go, how long does it take to fall 200ft?