Now Gordon wants your organs

Author
Discussion

G'kar

3,728 posts

189 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
mitzy said:
G'kar said:
mitzy said:
I have a doner card and have had it for over 10 years.
Me too. 15% off and extra chilli sauce.

lick
My post was a serious one given the topic, suggest you take it as that you cock.

Please let me know when you have to make that choice which I hope you dont have to.

We can all have a chukcle at your comments.

Edited by mitzy on Monday 17th November 16:47
Behave.


mitzy

13,857 posts

200 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
G'kar said:
mitzy said:
G'kar said:
mitzy said:
I have a doner card and have had it for over 10 years.
Me too. 15% off and extra chilli sauce.

lick
My post was a serious one given the topic, suggest you take it as that you cock.

Please let me know when you have to make that choice which I hope you dont have to.

We can all have a chukcle at your comments.

Edited by mitzy on Monday 17th November 16:47
Behave.
I suggest you do.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

252 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
G'kar said:
mitzy said:
I have a doner card and have had it for over 10 years.
Me too. 15% off and extra chilli sauce.

lick
she'll need it if she continues eating the elephant leg

Balmoral Green

41,200 posts

251 months

s3fella

10,524 posts

190 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
He can have my cxck and arxe, use them to replace him and Madleson.

mitzy

13,857 posts

200 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
G'kar said:
mitzy said:
I have a doner card and have had it for over 10 years.
Me too. 15% off and extra chilli sauce.

lick
she'll need it if she continues eating the elephant leg
More a woodcock girl myself.;)


sleep envy

62,260 posts

252 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
hehe

if only I'd managed a brace...

tomTVR

6,909 posts

244 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Why would Gordon want my blood? Hes not that bad is he?

King Herald

23,501 posts

219 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
elster said:


Do you know how many organs are taken for transplants.....out of the millions of people...next to none.

Which is why when I need a kidney transplant I wont get one.
If I die before you, you are welcome to one of mine, as long as you promise to use it to the full, live your every extra day to the max, and not destroy my donation in a booze fueled suicide bid, ala Georgie Best.

elster

17,517 posts

213 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
King Herald said:
elster said:


Do you know how many organs are taken for transplants.....out of the millions of people...next to none.

Which is why when I need a kidney transplant I wont get one.
If I die before you, you are welcome to one of mine, as long as you promise to use it to the full, live your every extra day to the max, and not destroy my donation in a booze fueled suicide bid, ala Georgie Best.
My body has pretty much forgotten what alcohol is apart from a very odd glass of wine.

carmonk

7,910 posts

190 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Good idea. When you're dead your organs no longer belong to you. On account of you being dead.

Edited by carmonk on Monday 17th November 20:38

SiH

1,832 posts

250 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
I think the idea of implied consent is utterly abhorrent. The current system is poorly managed and there is already a huge amount of wastage as countless registered donors do not have their organs harvested after their death (or more specifically deaths that leave viable organs, after all, you wouldn't want to receive the liver of someone who had died of liver failure!).

If the system of implied consent is introduced this would massively change the relationship between intensivists (the doctors who work in ITU), the patient and the patient's family. How would you like to be looked after by someone who you might feel (rightly or wrongly) is simply waiting for you to die so they can whip out your organs and give them to someone else?!

Not wishing to cast a cynical stone into the pond to stir the waters but is it just me, or is this rather coincidental timing given the fact that Gordy's sprog has been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis and is therefore pretty much a dead cert for needing a new pair of lungs in a few years?

:donsflameproofsuitandrunsforcover:

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

265 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
SiH said:
I think the idea of implied consent is utterly abhorrent. The current system is poorly managed and there is already a huge amount of wastage as countless registered donors do not have their organs harvested after their death (or more specifically deaths that leave viable organs, after all, you wouldn't want to receive the liver of someone who had died of liver failure!).

If the system of implied consent is introduced this would massively change the relationship between intensivists (the doctors who work in ITU), the patient and the patient's family. How would you like to be looked after by someone who you might feel (rightly or wrongly) is simply waiting for you to die so they can whip out your organs and give them to someone else?!

Not wishing to cast a cynical stone into the pond to stir the waters but is it just me, or is this rather coincidental timing given the fact that Gordy's sprog has been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis and is therefore pretty much a dead cert for needing a new pair of lungs in a few years?

:donsflameproofsuitandrunsforcover:
Strange that he (GB) needs personal involvement before taking decisions such as these (and not for the first time either)

Blukoo

3,812 posts

200 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
wow... how selfish do you sound.

I'm a blood donor, and i will be an organ donor when i die. I'm very happy to think that some parts of me will be able to save someones life after i'm gone.

Bushmaster

27,428 posts

282 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
superlightr said:
Its not a problem if you are dead. really dead. But as I understand it for most cases the organs to be of any use the donor has to be alive, preped and then organs removed then they die.

What if your not dead or about to die, how long do they give you on life suport? How almost dead do you have to be? people have woken up again after being in a coma. There is a conflict of interests, how long do the doctors keep you going for -v- the need to whip out your organs. What % of unlikely to survive do they work on before the say its ok to whip em out?

Doc 1 - 80% sure this person wont pull through - right whip out his eyes, and lungs.

Doc 2 - 95% sure this person wont pull through - whip out his heart and kidneys

Patient - hang on Im not dead yet and might be the 5% that make it......

Patient - uncosious and thinking keep on working me docs' dont give up on me just yet, I might make it but then hears them say - never mind give up now we need his bits for another...

Edited by superlightr on Monday 17th November 13:17
yes My concerns too.

Nick_F

10,154 posts

249 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Blukoo said:
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
wow... how selfish do you sound.

I'm a blood donor, and i will be an organ donor when i die. I'm very happy to think that some parts of me will be able to save someones life after i'm gone.
I'm pleased for you. Doubtless the state will, in due course, save you the trouble of deciding to donate blood, by making that compulsory, too.

wiffmaster

2,604 posts

201 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
They're welcome to mine - I'd prefer they were used to save a life, rather than being incinerated or left to the worms...

Yertis

18,217 posts

269 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Nick_F said:
Blukoo said:
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
wow... how selfish do you sound.

I'm a blood donor, and i will be an organ donor when i die. I'm very happy to think that some parts of me will be able to save someones life after i'm gone.
I'm pleased for you. Doubtless the state will, in due course, save you the trouble of deciding to donate blood, by making that compulsory, too.
It's only a matter of time. Use the NHS? Let's have some of your blood. Gone private? Give us your blood anyway, and by the way since you can afford "private" you only need one of those kidneys so we're having one of them too.

Gordon's probably after some new eyeballs...

elster

17,517 posts

213 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Why must you all try and say if this what is the next step.

What if this is actually a good step?

BTW your donor card is worthless if your family don't want it, or next of kin. Or pretty much every Tom, Dick and Harry.


grumbledoak

31,633 posts

236 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
elster said:
Why must you all try and say if this what is the next step.

What if this is actually a good step?
I think quite a few of us are tinfoil hat-free, thanks. No need for a 'next step' to worry.

The idea is abhorrent. Consent can be given, but never taken or assumed.

Edited by grumbledoak on Monday 17th November 22:10