General Election July 2024

Author
Discussion

AdeTuono

7,302 posts

230 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Sheets Tabuer said:
Just had my local Conservative MP knock on my door, asked me a few things, asked me what I thought of Boris, I told him he's a bellend hehe
What did you say about Boris?
Well, I thought it was quite funny... getmecoat

MC Bodge

22,159 posts

178 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
thetapeworm said:
Pie, Election Special Part 4: Conservatives

Yes. An absolute shower.

...Many people on here will ponder on that and then think,
"In this situation, what we really need is a party like that, but even moreso. Ah, Reform UK. That Farage seems like an upstanding, decent, man of the people"

robemcdonald

8,951 posts

199 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
Rivenink said:
Ridgemont said:
Boringvolvodriver said:
Rivenink said:
Chicken Chaser said:
thetapeworm said:
Pie, Election Special Part 4: Conservatives

Top drawer commentary. A truly tragic state of affairs.
And he still only scratched the surface.

If Labour can manage to be only half as st, it'll be an improvement.
When you watch that then you have to wonder how anyone can vote for them. or even think that Reform might be the answer.

Labour will have their work cut out but to paraphrase D:ream “Things can’t get any worse”

Call Jonathan Pie on BBC sounds is also a good listen
As a rant I give it 10/10.

As an accurate summary of history 1/10.
I like Pie. I think he is on a proper soap box shift there.
I could go through the list but frankly my life is too short and I would be wasting half an hour of my life to get a whole load of obvious rebuttals back.
Sounded accurate enough to my ears. Which was the most egregious inaccuracy for you?
It’s a rant. With around 100 factoids. I’m not sure where to start. And it’s meant as entertainment. Fair play. As political analysis? Well as Jon Stewart said many years ago ‘I’m a comedian, not a politician!’. Pie entertains. He’s hardly David Dimbleby is he?
Yeah, but out of the “100 factoids” which are factually incorrect?
Go for 10 if you can. Shouldn’t be a problem if it got 1/10 for accuracy.

BikeBikeBIke

8,726 posts

118 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Interesting programme on tv last night with Tim Harper looking at growth and how it has been delivered in the past.

In summary we need to spend on infrastructure at about 5x the amount we currently do. Short term tax increase or borrowing for long term growth.

Not sure either of the main parties has that policy.

Tim Harper is my choice for PM
Have we got anywhere we want to put that infrastructure? There's literally no empty land within tens of miles of me that people want developed.

beagrizzly

10,601 posts

234 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
thetapeworm said:
Pie, Election Special Part 4: Conservatives

Scrolled on to this, immediately thought of this:



As you were. Sorry.....

JagLover

43,003 posts

238 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Yes. An absolute shower.

...Many people on here will ponder on that and then think,
"In this situation, what we really need is a party like that, but even moreso. Ah, Reform UK.
No that is not what they are thinking. We are where we are because of the agenda that has been followed, which Labour both started and will be a continuation.

Moaning about high housing costs, high energy costs, high taxes and deteriorating public services while blindly supporting either Conservatives or Labour is very ironic. All are an inevitable consequence of the agenda which both parties serve.




ben5575

6,381 posts

224 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
JagLover said:
No that is not what they are thinking. We are where we are because of the agenda that has been followed, which Labour both started and will be a continuation.

Moaning about high housing costs, high energy costs, high taxes and deteriorating public services while blindly supporting either Conservatives or Labour is very ironic. All are an inevitable consequence of the agenda which both parties serve.
Yes, this was definitely my take from the Pie video; that it’s all Labour’s fault…

blueg33

36,763 posts

227 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
blueg33 said:
Interesting programme on tv last night with Tim Harper looking at growth and how it has been delivered in the past.

In summary we need to spend on infrastructure at about 5x the amount we currently do. Short term tax increase or borrowing for long term growth.

Not sure either of the main parties has that policy.

Tim Harper is my choice for PM
Have we got anywhere we want to put that infrastructure? There's literally no empty land within tens of miles of me that people want developed.
He dealt with that too. It was all sensible stuff, you know like using land near transport hubs. There is way more land than people think, much greenbelt is aesthetically and agriculturally poor, underused land in urban areas owned by the state could be released if they got their act together, planning need total reform etc

robemcdonald

8,951 posts

199 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Ridgemont said:
Rivenink said:
Ridgemont said:
Boringvolvodriver said:
Rivenink said:
Chicken Chaser said:
thetapeworm said:
Pie, Election Special Part 4: Conservatives

Top drawer commentary. A truly tragic state of affairs.
And he still only scratched the surface.

If Labour can manage to be only half as st, it'll be an improvement.
When you watch that then you have to wonder how anyone can vote for them. or even think that Reform might be the answer.

Labour will have their work cut out but to paraphrase D:ream “Things can’t get any worse”

Call Jonathan Pie on BBC sounds is also a good listen
As a rant I give it 10/10.

As an accurate summary of history 1/10.
I like Pie. I think he is on a proper soap box shift there.
I could go through the list but frankly my life is too short and I would be wasting half an hour of my life to get a whole load of obvious rebuttals back.
Sounded accurate enough to my ears. Which was the most egregious inaccuracy for you?
It’s a rant. With around 100 factoids. I’m not sure where to start. And it’s meant as entertainment. Fair play. As political analysis? Well as Jon Stewart said many years ago ‘I’m a comedian, not a politician!’. Pie entertains. He’s hardly David Dimbleby is he?
Yeah, but out of the “100 factoids” which are factually incorrect?
Go for 10 if you can. Shouldn’t be a problem if it got 1/10 for accuracy.
If it’s 1/10 (10%) accurate there should be 90 “factoids” which are incorrect. I’m asking you to name 10.
Shouldn’t be a problem?

BikeBikeBIke

8,726 posts

118 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
blueg33 said:
Interesting programme on tv last night with Tim Harper looking at growth and how it has been delivered in the past.

In summary we need to spend on infrastructure at about 5x the amount we currently do. Short term tax increase or borrowing for long term growth.

Not sure either of the main parties has that policy.

Tim Harper is my choice for PM
Have we got anywhere we want to put that infrastructure? There's literally no empty land within tens of miles of me that people want developed.
He dealt with that too. It was all sensible stuff, you know like using land near transport hubs. There is way more land than people think, much greenbelt is aesthetically and agriculturally poor, underused land in urban areas owned by the state could be released if they got their act together, planning need total reform etc
If there was land that was easy and affordable to develop it would already have happened. There aren't easy solutions to this. There's a road required near me. First planned in 1975 with a few routes suggested. 50 years on no government or local authority has ever got it built despite budget being available three times. Same arguments every decade or so. (And I'm glad, I don't want it either.)

Infrastructure is a doddle if you live in a sparsely populated desert. It's not in the UK.

And green belt needs to be sacrosanct. Almost all load outside of towns and cities needs to be sacrosanct.

If there's more land than we think then draconian protection of land will be very easy indeed and we can start really protecting land for ourselves and our decendents. Everyone will be happy.

Edited by BikeBikeBIke on Tuesday 2nd July 08:32

Puzzles

2,009 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
How’s hs2 going?

Puzzles

2,009 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
But I do agree with investment

BikeBikeBIke

8,726 posts

118 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Puzzles said:
How’s hs2 going?
Well, there is way more land than people think, so I imagine it's finished by now.

Timothy Bucktu

15,398 posts

203 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Yes. An absolute shower.

...Many people on here will ponder on that and then think,
"In this situation, what we really need is a party like that, but even moreso. Ah, Reform UK. That Farage seems like an upstanding, decent, man of the people"
The point is, they will hopefully drag the UK political climate back to a more sensible centrist house. The current Conservatives have slipped too far over to the left into la-la land. A country too left leaning is as bad as a country too right leaning...we need a reset and I hope Reform can make that happen.
Otherwise...what possible solution to the obvious problem is there?
I'll obviously be voting Reform, not because I trust Farage...he's an obvious grifter. But because I want the Conservatives to be conservative again. If they get a good enough kicking, hopefully that will sort them out.

BikeBikeBIke

8,726 posts

118 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Timothy Bucktu said:
The point is, they will hopefully drag the UK political climate back to a more sensible centrist house. The current Conservatives have slipped too far over to the left into la-la land. A country too left leaning is as bad as a country too right leaning...we need a reset and I hope Reform can make that happen.
Otherwise...what possible solution to the obvious problem is there?
I'll obviously be voting Reform, not because I trust Farage...he's an obvious grifter. But because I want the Conservatives to be conservative again. If they get a good enough kicking, hopefully that will sort them out.
I think you're going to be pleasantly suprised at how right wing Labour are going to be. They can't borrow becaise were maxed out. Seems unlikely there's a load of untapped tax revenue that the Torys missed. So what's their only option? Cuts; Smaller government.

https://youtu.be/qi4wLfsSScE?si=ktQqliCa88pCTGtD

President Merkin

3,877 posts

22 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Timothy Bucktu said:
The point is, they will hopefully drag the UK political climate back to a more sensible centrist house. The current Conservatives have slipped too far over to the left into la-la land.
I cannot fathom the reasoning that leads someone to this belief. Johnson purged the Tories of its moderates in 2019, replaced them with right wing mediocrities & embarked on a culture wars tour, sut down parliament illegaly, threatened repeatedly to do away with human rights protections, proposed leaving the ECHR, legislated repeatedly to suppress protest, gerrymandered voting & you're telling me with a straight face, these have been left wing? How tf have you worked that out?

swisstoni

17,502 posts

282 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
Timothy Bucktu said:
The point is, they will hopefully drag the UK political climate back to a more sensible centrist house. The current Conservatives have slipped too far over to the left into la-la land. A country too left leaning is as bad as a country too right leaning...we need a reset and I hope Reform can make that happen.
Otherwise...what possible solution to the obvious problem is there?
I'll obviously be voting Reform, not because I trust Farage...he's an obvious grifter. But because I want the Conservatives to be conservative again. If they get a good enough kicking, hopefully that will sort them out.
I think you're going to be pleasantly suprised at how right wing Labour are going to be. They can't borrow becaise were maxed out. Seems unlikely there's a load of untapped tax revenue that the Torys missed. So what's their only option? Cuts; Smaller government.

https://youtu.be/qi4wLfsSScE?si=ktQqliCa88pCTGtD
I think there’s plenty of untapped tax revenue. It just isn’t in places the Tories wanted to go.
In addition they say they are going to fund a lot from growth.

JagLover

43,003 posts

238 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
I think you're going to be pleasantly suprised at how right wing Labour are going to be. They can't borrow becaise were maxed out. Seems unlikely there's a load of untapped tax revenue that the Torys missed. So what's their only option? Cuts; Smaller government.

https://youtu.be/qi4wLfsSScE?si=ktQqliCa88pCTGtD
Yes and no.

Yes because without touching headline rates of tax the scope is limited, but no because there are areas of tax Labour could hit which the Tories realistically couldn't.

They could fairly easily raise another £25bn a year or so from tax relief on pension contributions, fuel duty, and council tax alone for example, just to mention the areas most often discussed.

BikeBikeBIke

8,726 posts

118 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Yes and no.

Yes because without touching headline rates of tax the scope is limited, but no because there are areas of tax Labour could hit which the Tories realistically couldn't.

They could fairly easily raise another £25bn a year or so from tax relief on pension contributions, fuel duty, and council tax alone for example, just to mention the areas most often discussed.
If that were politically feasable the Torys would have already done it.

turbobloke

104,961 posts

263 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
Puzzles said:
How’s hs2 going?
Well, there is way more land than people think, so I imagine it's finished by now.
On the 'more land' is that undeveloped land? UK land by area is 8% built-on, but that uses a definition with 'any improvement' including mere drainage as well as roads / rail / buildings. With a more realistic definition around infrastructure it's 6% leaving 94% undeveloped. 37% of that is protected against development by one designation or another.

The EU average is around 95% undeveloped, including countries which are far less densely populated. On the face of it there's room for more development without infringing on e.g. green belt

There was a Radio 2 prog years ago discussing this which asked listeners for their opinion on what percentage of UK land was built on, of those broadcast one reply was in single figures, many 'answers' they read out came in between 60% and 80% totally unrealistic.