General Election July 2024
Discussion
fourstardan said:
Has anyone seen the Farage Nick Robinson interview.
Far different tone to his opposition!
Judging from the lack of reaction it must have gone far better than some people expected. What struck me was the conversational style compared to the interviewer vs rabbit in the headlights style of say Rishi or the job interview style of Starmer.Far different tone to his opposition!
Wills2 said:
Rufus Stone said:
bhstewie said:
Ageism.Used to be with age comes wisdom, these days it's just dementia.
You'd think before writing a piece like that a journalist might just go and check the ages of some of our former great leaders when they were in office, wouldn't you?
WCZ said:
fourstardan said:
Has anyone seen the Farage Nick Robinson interview.
Far different tone to his opposition!
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion Far different tone to his opposition!
Vanden Saab said:
Judging from the lack of reaction it must have gone far better than some people expected. What struck me was the conversational style compared to the interviewer vs rabbit in the headlights style of say Rishi or the job interview style of Starmer.
Sunak wants to be something he isn'tStarmer wants to make us think he isn't something but is
Farage is Nigel Farage
Kermit power said:
Wills2 said:
Rufus Stone said:
bhstewie said:
Ageism.Used to be with age comes wisdom, these days it's just dementia.
You'd think before writing a piece like that a journalist might just go and check the ages of some of our former great leaders when they were in office, wouldn't you?
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
https://x.com/coldwarsteve/status/1804217283104919...
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
turbobloke said:
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
S600BSB said:
turbobloke said:
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
S600BSB said:
turbobloke said:
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
It doesn't suit the West to look too closely at the background to the Ukraine conflict. You have to wonder why any debate is shut down so quickly. Reminds me of 'trusting the science'. There is no debate, Putin bad, West/Nato/Eu/Zelensky good.
Unreal said:
S600BSB said:
turbobloke said:
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
It doesn't suit the West to look too closely at the background to the Ukraine conflict. You have to wonder why any debate is shut down so quickly. Reminds me of 'trusting the science'. There is no debate, Putin bad, West/Nato/Eu/Zelensky good.
They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
Unreal said:
I think it will gain them some. Whether it's like their net immigration aims we will have to see.
It doesn't suit the West to look too closely at the background to the Ukraine conflict. You have to wonder why any debate is shut down so quickly. Reminds me of 'trusting the science'. There is no debate, Putin bad, West/Nato/Eu/Zelensky good.
Putin is a good bloke really?It doesn't suit the West to look too closely at the background to the Ukraine conflict. You have to wonder why any debate is shut down so quickly. Reminds me of 'trusting the science'. There is no debate, Putin bad, West/Nato/Eu/Zelensky good.
pingu393 said:
Unreal said:
S600BSB said:
turbobloke said:
WCZ said:
Not seen it but did read farage said the west provoked Ukraine’s invasion
While I don't agree with that view, if that's what he said then he isn't alone. As per this LSE article, the Financial Times, the New York Times & the Guardian have suggested that NATO is partly to blame.I agree with the title of the article.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/04/27/nato...
It doesn't suit the West to look too closely at the background to the Ukraine conflict. You have to wonder why any debate is shut down so quickly. Reminds me of 'trusting the science'. There is no debate, Putin bad, West/Nato/Eu/Zelensky good.
They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
At least Farage's comnents and the BBC's interpretation might produce a little more useful debate.
We know he is playing for 2029. This is just the sort of thing to help keep him making headlines and differentiating Reform from the other parties.
Edited by Unreal on Saturday 22 June 10:48
pingu393 said:
How many have only read the headline, and not seen the interview?
They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
Ah, so the media have deliberately misrepresented what someone might have said in order to make him look bad by implying he said something per headlines that wasn't necessarily an accurate reflection of what was being said? What a surprise.....They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
isaldiri said:
pingu393 said:
How many have only read the headline, and not seen the interview?
They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
Ah, so the media have deliberately misrepresented what someone might have said in order to make him look bad by implying he said something per headlines that wasn't necessarily an accurate reflection of what was being said? What a surprise.....They will definitely agree with the BBC's interpretation.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff