Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party? (Vol. 2)
Discussion
anonymoususer said:
Can and has and is on his way to a massive majority.
Corbyn would never have been able to achieve this
Could he? Has he? Revived the Labour Party I mean? Is it not actually that he fouled up less in the voters' eyes than Sunak is perceived to have done? There's still people questioning Labour's ability based on their past, and yet Sunak managed to dive beneath that and screw the Tory image completely. There have been counter arguments put forward in mitigation: covid and lockdowns, the cost of paying for furlough and all the other contingent costs of a full-on panic response to the pandemic which Labour would have reacted even more uncontrollably to if their comments at the time were credible, Ukraine war effect on global energy prices, etc., but these have hardly been heard. Without running a control sequence it cannot be said that any other party would have cocked-up less.Corbyn would never have been able to achieve this
turbobloke said:
andy43 said:
President Merkin said:
Fewer. He'll still be in Downing Street this morning giving a speech, so chin up lads.
I hope they let him finish this time. Sky cut to Ed ‘Chip Cobb’ Davey earlier.motco said:
President Merkin said:
Fewer. He'll still be in Downing Street this morning giving a speech, so chin up lads.
On 35% of the popular vote - lower than Blair scored! First past the post is now clearly on borrowed time.motco said:
On 35% of the popular vote - lower than Blair scored!
That is one of the many remarkable things about this election. The Labour Party has only gained +1.6 points. Not a ringing endorsement for SKS.
The collapse of the Tory vote is huge -19.9 points. Most of that seems to have gone to Reform (+12.3).
Not quite as clear cut as that I’m sure. I’d guess that many Conservative voters went Labour and many Labour went Green (another big gainer +4.1).
Lib Dems not much changed either (+0.6).
AstonZagato said:
motco said:
On 35% of the popular vote - lower than Blair scored!
That is one of the many remarkable things about this election. The Labour Party has only gained +1.6 points. Not a ringing endorsement for SKS.
The collapse of the Tory vote is huge -19.9 points. Most of that seems to have gone to Reform (+12.3).
Not quite as clear cut as that I’m sure. I’d guess that many Conservative voters went Labour and many Labour went Green (another big gainer +4.1).
Lib Dems not much changed either (+0.6).
Starmer isn’t exactly inspiring but he will be competent. The chemo may not feel good, it may even feel bad, but you do it because it has to be done to kill the cancer.
The chemo worked yesterday.
AstonZagato said:
motco said:
On 35% of the popular vote - lower than Blair scored!
That is one of the many remarkable things about this election. The Labour Party has only gained +1.6 points. Not a ringing endorsement for SKS.
The collapse of the Tory vote is huge -19.9 points. Most of that seems to have gone to Reform (+12.3).
Not quite as clear cut as that I’m sure. I’d guess that many Conservative voters went Labour and many Labour went Green (another big gainer +4.1).
Lib Dems not much changed either (+0.6).
President Merkin said:
AstonZagato said:
motco said:
On 35% of the popular vote - lower than Blair scored!
That is one of the many remarkable things about this election. The Labour Party has only gained +1.6 points. Not a ringing endorsement for SKS.
The collapse of the Tory vote is huge -19.9 points. Most of that seems to have gone to Reform (+12.3).
Not quite as clear cut as that I’m sure. I’d guess that many Conservative voters went Labour and many Labour went Green (another big gainer +4.1).
Lib Dems not much changed either (+0.6).
In 1977 Thatcher polled 44% on a 76% turnout - i.e. 33.5% of the eligible electorate & she had a majority of 43
Starmer has polled 33% on a 60% turnout so just under 20% of the total for a majority of over 180
All down to FPTP obviously but not exactly what you could objectively describe as a huge democratic mandate when 4 out of 5 people are not supporting you.
The obvious answer is some form of PR but I've never been convinced that would work especially well with our culture and our system. It takes politicians capable of proper collaboration and compromise. Don't know how we fix that to make it better without making it worse first.
If Starmer has any sense he will recognise that these numbers mean that the same thing can happen to him the next time.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff