Another dog attack

Author
Discussion

cookie1600

2,167 posts

164 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Genuine question; can a dog be Tasered to successfully subdue it?

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
Genuine question; can a dog be Tasered to successfully subdue it?
Yes they can. However you need to keep the taser 'on' whilst you move the dog into something to secure it. If you don't it'll just be even more pissed off and run away.

Tasered dogs have been secured in wheelie bins before.

irc

7,683 posts

139 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
That's an interesting take on my post.

Drugs and firearms also kill far more people than XL bullies but those specialist dogs and handlers who would ordinarily be tackling those things are being used to collect dogs.

What do you think about that?
I think we need more dog handlers. XL Bullys , drugs, and firearms all need dealt with. We can't allocate police time on the basis of deaths anyway but if the police won't deal with XL Bully owners breaking the law who should?

UK population has grown over the last decade. Without checking numbers I would guess police numbers have shrunk. The police are sometimes their own worst enemy. Other agencies when asked to take on additional tasks ask for more resources the police do it from existing resources which may at one time have worked. There is no fat now. Any new task they take on means doing less in other areas.

The buck stops with the politicians though. They cut police budgets. Cutting the number of police dog handlers was part of the response. Which like many cuts can come back to bite you so to speak.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27757477




Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
irc said:
Greendubber said:
That's an interesting take on my post.

Drugs and firearms also kill far more people than XL bullies but those specialist dogs and handlers who would ordinarily be tackling those things are being used to collect dogs.

What do you think about that?
I think we need more dog handlers. XL Bullys , drugs, and firearms all need dealt with. We can't allocate police time on the basis of deaths anyway but if the police won't deal with XL Bully owners breaking the law who should?

UK population has grown over the last decade. Without checking numbers I would guess police numbers have shrunk. The police are sometimes their own worst enemy. Other agencies when asked to take on additional tasks ask for more resources the police do it from existing resources which may at one time have worked. There is no fat now. Any new task they take on means doing less in other areas.

The buck stops with the politicians though. They cut police budgets. Cutting the number of police dog handlers was part of the response. Which like many cuts can come back to bite you so to speak.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27757477
Agreed but unfortunately people don't say 'grrrr bloody politicians cutting budgets/numbers'

They just say 'fking st police etc blah blah' rinse and repeat.

Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Agreed but unfortunately people don't say 'grrrr bloody politicians cutting budgets/numbers'

They just say 'fking st police etc blah blah' rinse and repeat.
Under austerity my force went from 120 handlers down to 20

Which basically meant a max of 3 poss 4 covering the entire force area instead of 2 or 3 per division.

Stan the Bat

9,036 posts

215 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.

Bigends

5,500 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxe2nr84kp1o

Another dog shot - an Akita this time.

Murph7355

38,074 posts

259 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
irc said:
...XL Bullys , drugs, and firearms all need dealt with. ....
I would guess you could kill several birds with one stone in many cases with that lot.

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels
With a lot more demand now though I'd suggest?

15 years ago if the number if logs went over 1000 in a 24hr period it was a massive deal, these days were knocking on the door of 6000 daily.

Unreal

3,863 posts

28 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Unreal said:
Greendubber said:
Back on topic:

There isn't enough kennel space for all the XLs that are being seized by police. We ended up taking 5 off someone the other day that weren't registered but they have to be stored securely so they can be assessed (at cost to us) Then the owners have the opportunity to go to court to appeal it if they wish, they won't though, they'll just sign the dogs ober and they'll be put down, all at a cost to us.

We've had to employ another secure kennel business as every inch of existing space my force has for storing dogs was full. It's costing an absolute fortune. Our dog handlers don't even get to work their own dogs on some shifts as they're out collecting XLs all shift. Want a police dog to catch a burglar? Sorry, all the handlers are picking up dogs all day.

So no men in balaclavas, just way too many dogs, irresponsible owners and a lack of foresight when the legislation was pushed through. There will be thousands of dogs all in secure kennels at the moment being paid for by all of us at great expense.
Fortunately it would appear it's just a matter of time. If your experience continues most of these dogs will be dead before long unless there is an inexhaustible supply chain. It sounds like good use of Police time to me.
They won't be, people will still continue to breed them and ignore the rules. Sadly some people just see them as disposable items, sign it over and let the tax payer pick up the transport, storage and destruction fees.

I'd rather our dog handlers were doing proactive police work rather than being used as chauffeurs for scumbags dogs.
I'm dubious that the numbers won't decrease but we'll have to wait and see.

Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Bigends said:
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels
With a lot more demand now though I'd suggest?

15 years ago if the number if logs went over 1000 in a 24hr period it was a massive deal, these days were knocking on the door of 6000 daily.
Numbers may be up, but they aren’t the same type of cops unfortunately

Cameron kicking the cops in the balls coincided with the big uplift in the 80’s from Edmund Davis hitting retirement age and the 30+ schemes being stopped forcing more out

They stopped recruiting completely for around 5 years, closed and sold off the training schools, got rid of or completely hollowed out specialist skilled departments such as Dog sections, Traffic and CID and even driving schools .. they even struggle to find cops who can drive the riot vans!

When eventually they did start recruiting again, and in vast numbers they didn’t have the facilities, trainers or experienced staff to mentor the new recruits.

Have a degree? Come and be a detective!

In my old force over 50% of Constables now have less than 2 years service

Cameron and May fked it, simple as

swisstoni

17,458 posts

282 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I agree with that. The disappearance of the police from our daily lives has greatly affected society.

Police have had to restrict their activities to the most serious crimes (if that) and have left alone the lesser behaviours that affect our general wellbeing.

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
I agree with that. The disappearance of the police from our daily lives has greatly affected society.

Police have had to restrict their activities to the most serious crimes (if that) and have left alone the lesser behaviours that affect our general wellbeing.
The police are really good at solving murders and serious crimes but crap for the majority of 'every day' crimes that people report on a daily basis.

That's naturally going to leave people with a st opinion because it's all about what matters to them, for example a stolen car or theft of a pedal cycle that just gets filed without a cop even casting their eyes over it.

Gareth79

7,786 posts

249 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels
In Hampshire police numbers dropped steeply since 2010, then recovered more recently and this year should be back above what they were in 2010, but probably not enough to support the population growth in that time.

The obvious question is whether the pay/conditions are good enough for them to have recruited and trained officers to the quality required. It's no good having 500 extra officers if half of them are st.


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 3rd July 11:57

Bigends

5,500 posts

131 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
Bigends said:
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels
In Hampshire police numbers dropped steeply since 2010, then recovered more recently and this year should be back above what they were in 2010, but probably not enough to support the population growth in that time.

The obvious question is whether the pay/conditions are good enough for them to have recruited and trained officers to the quality required. It's no good having 500 extra officers if half of them are st.


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 3rd July 11:57
Agreed. I still have dealings as a volunteer with my old force. Earlier this year we needed a hand moving some stuff and asked one of the student trainers if his class could give us a hand. Pleasant enough bunch but on the QT, the trainer told us he doubted that more than half a dozen of the twenty or so of them would last more than a couple of years

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
Bigends said:
Stan the Bat said:
Why are police numbers cut all the time, they should be increased.
Apparently varies countrywide - my old lot are at the highest level theyve ever been, and well above pre austerity levels
In Hampshire police numbers dropped steeply since 2010, then recovered more recently and this year should be back above what they were in 2010, but probably not enough to support the population growth in that time.

The obvious question is whether the pay/conditions are good enough for them to have recruited and trained officers to the quality required. It's no good having 500 extra officers if half of them are st.


Edited by Gareth79 on Wednesday 3rd July 11:57
The recruits that are coming through are pretty terrible at the moment. Forces were told to recruit a certain amount or receive a fine so guess what happened to the quality of joiners?


I could bang on all day about some of the horror stories I've heard and things I've seen but won't. They're not all bad but I'm amazed some of them can navigate their way out of their beds every morning.

andyA700

2,939 posts

40 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxe2nr84kp1o

Another dog shot - an Akita this time.
About five years ago, there was a guy with an Akita in our village. I used to chat to him, but used to keep a bit of distance between me and the dog. One day it lunged up at me, but thankfully I was out of range and he had a secure grip on the lead. It really shook me up. I havn't seen him or the dog since.

Greendubber

13,338 posts

206 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
andyA700 said:
Greendubber said:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxe2nr84kp1o

Another dog shot - an Akita this time.
About five years ago, there was a guy with an Akita in our village. I used to chat to him, but used to keep a bit of distance between me and the dog. One day it lunged up at me, but thankfully I was out of range and he had a secure grip on the lead. It really shook me up. I havn't seen him or the dog since.
I've never had a good experience with one. They seemed to be the dog of choice for scumbags a while back, usually kept in a completely slabbed/concrete back garden full of enormous piles of their own st and never walked.

cayman-black

12,735 posts

219 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
andyA700 said:
Greendubber said:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxe2nr84kp1o

Another dog shot - an Akita this time.
About five years ago, there was a guy with an Akita in our village. I used to chat to him, but used to keep a bit of distance between me and the dog. One day it lunged up at me, but thankfully I was out of range and he had a secure grip on the lead. It really shook me up. I havn't seen him or the dog since.
I've never had a good experience with one. They seemed to be the dog of choice for scumbags a while back, usually kept in a completely slabbed/concrete back garden full of enormous piles of their own st and never walked.
The above is why the owner should be shot and not the dog.