Elon Musk $41B offer for Twitter

Elon Musk $41B offer for Twitter

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
ZedLeg said:
Free speech as you describe it is already protected. What free speech absolutists like Musk and his fanboys want is the ability to say whatever they want with no consequences. No matter how harmful or untruthful it is.
It’s not protected. Just look at many recent cancellations of guest speakers at various Universities. The students actively prevent free speech. They riot, threaten, shout down etc should someone with a different view come to have an open discussion.

robscot

2,341 posts

193 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
His free speech is calling the Thai cave rescuer a 'pedo'.



(It is well worth watching The Rescue doc - think it is on Disney+ )

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Gweeds said:
Bandit said:
Free speech is having the ability to voice an opinion, no matter how distasteful it might be to someone else.

There are laws in place to deal with racist and homophobic idiots.
So free speech doesn’t exist then does it.
In English?

Gweeds

7,954 posts

55 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
In English?
What are you struggling with?


anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
robscot said:
His free speech is calling the Thai cave rescuer a 'pedo'.



(It is well worth watching The Rescue doc - think it is on Disney+ )
That accusation resulted in a criminal investigation (into the idiot that made the comment)

ZedLeg

12,278 posts

111 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
ZedLeg said:
Free speech as you describe it is already protected. What free speech absolutists like Musk and his fanboys want is the ability to say whatever they want with no consequences. No matter how harmful or untruthful it is.
It’s not protected. Just look at many recent cancellations of guest speakers at various Universities. The students actively prevent free speech. They riot, threaten, shout down etc should someone with a different view come to have an open discussion.
This has been said infinity times before but private institutions deciding not to have someone speak isn't infringing free speech. The problem with free speech absolutists is that they always prioritise their own free speech over everyone else's. They should be able to say whatever they want but if you want to protest what they're saying then you're "cancelling" them or whatever.

Getting cancelled is the best thing that usually happens to these people, it's impossible to get them to shut up about it. News interviews, columns in national newspapers, books.

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Gweeds said:
What are you struggling with?
You suggesting that free speech “doesn’t exist then” ?
How can my definition of free speech “not exist”

Gweeds

7,954 posts

55 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
You suggesting that free speech “doesn’t exist then” ?
How can my definition of free speech “not exist”
The clue is in the word free.

You claimed it, and then immediately accepted there are limits on it.

See?

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
ZedLeg said:
This has been said infinity times before but private institutions deciding not to have someone speak isn't infringing free speech. The problem with free speech absolutists is that they always prioritise their own free speech over everyone else's. They should be able to say whatever they want but if you want to protest what they're saying then you're "cancelling" them or whatever.

Getting cancelled is the best thing that usually happens to these people, it's impossible to get them to shut up about it. News interviews, columns in national newspapers, books.
The “private institutions” are the things that invited these people to speak. It’s the public (students) who refuse to let it happen.

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Gweeds said:
The clue is in the word free.

You claimed it, and then immediately accepted there are limits on it.

See?
No I didn’t, I said there were consequences to it.

ZedLeg

12,278 posts

111 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
ZedLeg said:
This has been said infinity times before but private institutions deciding not to have someone speak isn't infringing free speech. The problem with free speech absolutists is that they always prioritise their own free speech over everyone else's. They should be able to say whatever they want but if you want to protest what they're saying then you're "cancelling" them or whatever.

Getting cancelled is the best thing that usually happens to these people, it's impossible to get them to shut up about it. News interviews, columns in national newspapers, books.
The “private institutions” are the things that invited these people to speak. It’s the public (students) who refuse to let it happen.
Right but if the institution then decides not to host the person being protested, it's not an infringement of free speech. No one is saying that person can't talk.

bitchstewie

52,720 posts

213 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
ZedLeg said:
This has been said infinity times before but private institutions deciding not to have someone speak isn't infringing free speech. The problem with free speech absolutists is that they always prioritise their own free speech over everyone else's. They should be able to say whatever they want but if you want to protest what they're saying then you're "cancelling" them or whatever.

Getting cancelled is the best thing that usually happens to these people, it's impossible to get them to shut up about it. News interviews, columns in national newspapers, books.
Quite.

There's often a pattern where people want the right to say whatever they want "because free speech" but when other people use their right to free speech to respond to it (legally) by pointing out that what they've said is actually pretty disgusting "you're cancelling me".

Gweeds

7,954 posts

55 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
No I didn’t, I said there were consequences to it.
So free speech doesn't exist. Got there in the end.

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
ZedLeg said:
Right but if the institution then decides not to host the person being protested, it's not an infringement of free speech. No one is saying that person can't talk.
That’s exactly what’s happening. The students are saying “that person cannot talk.”

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Gweeds said:
So free speech doesn't exist. Got there in the end.
No free speech does / can exist. You will get there in the end.

Gweeds

7,954 posts

55 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
No free speech does / can exist.
Explain how.

As a help for you, focus on the word 'free'.


Gweeds

7,954 posts

55 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
That’s exactly what’s happening. The students are saying “that person cannot talk.”
They're saying they don't want to sit and listen to it. More often than not because the speaker will have a history of hate speech, racism, anti-semitism....

So they're exercising their rights to freedom of expression no?


anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Quite.

There's often a pattern where people want the right to say whatever they want "because free speech" but when other people use their right to free speech to respond to it (legally) by pointing out that what they've said is actually pretty disgusting "you're cancelling me".
No Stewie, I’m perfectly happy with people responding to opinions and sharing their distaste with what was said. My issues is when someone is stopped from saying anything at all (to anyone) which is what is happening in our Universities.

ZedLeg

12,278 posts

111 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Bandit said:
ZedLeg said:
Right but if the institution then decides not to host the person being protested, it's not an infringement of free speech. No one is saying that person can't talk.
That’s exactly what’s happening. The students are saying “that person cannot talk.”
In that place. They're free to find somewhere with views more in line with their own to talk.

pquinn

7,167 posts

49 months

Tuesday 26th April 2022
quotequote all
Funny that people think there might be a cleanout of bots, they obviously haven't seen Elon's own mob of fake followers and flying monkeys in action.

I half wonder if he's really so sensitive about his own account that once his mate Jack was out of the way he felt this was the best way to keep his own podium alive? He relies on Twitter in a way that makes even Trump look like a casual user.