46th President of the United States, Joe Biden
Discussion
hidetheelephants said:
thatsprettyshady said:
All three threads are littered with many such examples.
My main issue with all of them (the threads) is that when Biden/Biden fans do the same thing as Trump they are somehow always good and doing it in the interests of the people so should be applauded, but when Trump does something it’s always either terrible, an abuse of power or it’s extrapolated out to worse case scenario where trump is LiTeRaLlY hItLeR.
It’s usually the same rhetoric and actions from both, dressed up differently.
You carried on an argument for several pages accusing others of arguing for things they were actually arguing against. Are you literally Joe Biden? My main issue with all of them (the threads) is that when Biden/Biden fans do the same thing as Trump they are somehow always good and doing it in the interests of the people so should be applauded, but when Trump does something it’s always either terrible, an abuse of power or it’s extrapolated out to worse case scenario where trump is LiTeRaLlY hItLeR.
It’s usually the same rhetoric and actions from both, dressed up differently.
LF5335 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Is this the one where posters were asserting that citizens in a democracy are only allowed to protest for things that they agree with?
No it’s the one where you tied yourself in knots trying to defend white supremacists. thatsprettyshady said:
I didn't tie myself in knots at all, I was supporting the right of people to (peacefully) protest whatever they see fit, you were the one saying that people somehow are not allowed to protest things that "cross a line" - do you see how limiting peoples right to protest could be problematic?
I have you two examples of things to show that there is a line. You ignored that. You were in knots LF5335 said:
I have you two examples of things to show that there is a line. You ignored that. You were in knots
No, there is no line to what people should be allowed to peacefully protest, this is what i was trying to explain but you were not understanding. Another poster rightly pointed out that if there was a "line" we wouldn't have the LGBT rights we have now because back then some stuffy types would have banned it for being indecent or whatever.
You of course extrapolated it out to "defending white supremacists" but this isn't what was happening, I think you were the one tying yourself in knots trying to pin that on me.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Thursday 4th July 13:36
First Amendment to the US Constitution
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
There is no line.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
There is no line.
thatsprettyshady said:
No, there is no line to what people should be allowed to peacefully protest, this is what i was trying to explain but you were not understanding.
Another poster rightly pointed out that if there was a "line" we wouldn't have the LGBT rights we have now because back then some stuffy types would have banned it for being indecent or whatever.
You of course extrapolated it out to "defending white supremacists" but this isn't what was happening, I think you were the one tying yourself in knots trying to pin that on me.
People’s sexuality is not comparable to racism, white supremacy or the examples I gave you. If you truly believe that everyone should be free to protest anything then defend murderers protesting their right or paedos demanding the right to pursue it. Another poster rightly pointed out that if there was a "line" we wouldn't have the LGBT rights we have now because back then some stuffy types would have banned it for being indecent or whatever.
You of course extrapolated it out to "defending white supremacists" but this isn't what was happening, I think you were the one tying yourself in knots trying to pin that on me.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Thursday 4th July 13:36
LF5335 said:
People’s sexuality is not comparable to racism, white supremacy or the examples I gave you. If you truly believe that everyone should be free to protest anything then defend murderers protesting their right or paedos demanding the right to pursue it.
Yes, people should be free to protest anything they like - I don't need to agree with what they are protesting about. Mortarboard said:
And yet fir all pneumothorax' insistence the diagnosis is obvious,he still hasn't stated what obvious symptoms lead to it, as opposed to occans razor scenario of "old man with a known speech impediment"
M.
I believe the bottom of this page (assuming your on kids page sizes, like me) is the closest he came to explaining why he thinks what he thinks. Lack of muscle response in his face and speech issues. M.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
I don't think any diagnosis given from TV pictures can be relied on too much, but to me it's interesting that a doctor chimed in and was so certain, you would think more well known physicians would have done the same.
thatsprettyshady said:
I believe the bottom of this page (assuming your on kids page sizes, like me) is the closest he came to explaining why he thinks what he thinks. Lack of muscle response in his face and speech issues.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
I don't think any diagnosis given from TV pictures can be relied on too much, but to me it's interesting that a doctor chimed in and was so certain, you would think more well known physicians would have done the same.
I read that. If that's his "obvious" symptoms, he's no doctor. Or med student. Or aware that jb has a speech impediment.https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
I don't think any diagnosis given from TV pictures can be relied on too much, but to me it's interesting that a doctor chimed in and was so certain, you would think more well known physicians would have done the same.
He made an extraordinary claim, that requires extraordinary proof.
M.
Biden tells governors he got a medical checkup - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/03/biden-tel...
Mortarboard said:
And also the fact that for old jb to have Parkinson, two highly improbable things would also have to be true.
M.
Maybe one highly likely thing has happened. They've been telling porkies. Is it beyond your imagination that 'your' side might actually be capable of deceit?M.
thatsprettyshady said:
Biden tells governors he got a medical checkup - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/03/biden-tel...
I’m fine - nothing to see here….Mortarboard said:
thatsprettyshady said:
I believe the bottom of this page (assuming your on kids page sizes, like me) is the closest he came to explaining why he thinks what he thinks. Lack of muscle response in his face and speech issues.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
I don't think any diagnosis given from TV pictures can be relied on too much, but to me it's interesting that a doctor chimed in and was so certain, you would think more well known physicians would have done the same.
I read that. If that's his "obvious" symptoms, he's no doctor. Or med student. Or aware that jb has a speech impediment.https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
I don't think any diagnosis given from TV pictures can be relied on too much, but to me it's interesting that a doctor chimed in and was so certain, you would think more well known physicians would have done the same.
He made an extraordinary claim, that requires extraordinary proof.
M.
My S-I-L is a Physio and she says she can walk around the supermarket and literally point at the people with Parkinsons. Billy Connelly was spotted by a guy at a gig and diagnosed by the way he walked. There's a "robotic" walk which is unmistakable, staring eyes, a kind of suprised look. It's unmistakable.
I've no idea if Biden shows those features.
PurplePenguin said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Biden tells governors he got a medical checkup - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/03/biden-tel...
I’m fine - nothing to see here….PurplePenguin said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Biden tells governors he got a medical checkup - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/03/biden-tel...
I’m fine - nothing to see here….
vetrof said:
Maybe one highly likely thing has happened. They've been telling porkies. Is it beyond your imagination that 'your' side might actually be capable of deceit?
And the RNC dont know?Wanna buy a bridge? Or the eiffel tower?
You seriously think that a big money donor wouldn't have a doctor give them an option before filling over literally millions?
Chinny reckon.
M.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff