46th President of the United States, Joe Biden

46th President of the United States, Joe Biden

Author
Discussion

thatsprettyshady

2,072 posts

168 months

paulguitar said:
thatsprettyshady said:
paulguitar said:
thatsprettyshady said:
But again, we don't talk about that.
What are you doing now then?


silly
seriously?
You've posted a load of links and said 'we don't talk about that'.

confused
It's was in response to another poster (sarcastically) saying "Shhh, we don't talk about that" regrding Biden's illegal handling of classified documents, I was carrying on the joke with my own "But we don't talk about that".

Really odd that I'm having to explain that.

thatsprettyshady

2,072 posts

168 months

dvs_dave said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Wheelspinning said:
Beati Dogu said:
Mortarboard said:
For example, under patriot act, an individual could be held indefinitely in somewhere like guantanamo, to prevent them from leaking classified information to enemies.

Like say, someone who had meetings with Putin, wrote letters to north Korea, and had literally boxes of classified information?

Hmmmmmm. wink

M.
And yet Biden wasn’t prosecuted for having classified documents a few months ago because a special counsel deemed he wasn’t mentally fit to face trial.
Ssssssh....we don't talk about that...
Or the fact that Hunter Biden, someone who "has the ear" of Joe Biden, took money from a disgraced, criminal Romanian businessman. Hunter also made millions from deals with state-backed Chinese firms and Joe was paid money from his brother with funds originating from a Chinese firm - again state backed.

But again, we don't talk about that.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-bide...

https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/comer-shows-bidens-g...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-54553132
laugh Quoted for posterity. These guys really have lost their way. Fortunately they don’t get to vote in the US so we can cheerily point and laugh. They do however get a say this Thursday which is a concern.
It's okay, keep ignoring the transgressions of "your guy", I'm sure he's 100% straight down the line.

Mortarboard

6,315 posts

58 months

thatsprettyshady said:
Joe and Hunter famously blurred the lines between personal and professional, Hunter conducted business using Air Force two

https://nypost.com/2023/08/25/hunter-biden-flew-on...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/bid...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-trav...

But of course, there could have been no connection between any of it and Joe Biden was simply unaware the whole time.
Son travelling with his dad is hardly "conducting business" biglaugh

And again, criminal investigation, and "impeachment enquiry"

And nada.

M.

thatsprettyshady

2,072 posts

168 months

Democrats now asking for election to be postponed indefinitely, in a completely non-dictatorial move.

https://x.com/mmpadellan/status/180778478480799377...

This particular poster was paid $57,000 in 2020 by a left wing PAC.

paulguitar

24,432 posts

116 months

thatsprettyshady said:
Democrats now asking for election to be postponed indefinitely, in a completely non-dictatorial move.
One person.



pinchmeimdreamin

10,060 posts

221 months

thatsprettyshady said:
Democrats now asking for election to be postponed indefinitely, in a completely non-dictatorial move.

https://x.com/mmpadellan/status/180778478480799377...

This particular poster was paid $57,000 in 2020 by a left wing PAC.
One person on Twitter is hardly the “Democrats” laugh

dvs_dave

8,818 posts

228 months

thatsprettyshady said:
dvs_dave said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Wheelspinning said:
Beati Dogu said:
Mortarboard said:
For example, under patriot act, an individual could be held indefinitely in somewhere like guantanamo, to prevent them from leaking classified information to enemies.

Like say, someone who had meetings with Putin, wrote letters to north Korea, and had literally boxes of classified information?

Hmmmmmm. wink

M.
And yet Biden wasn’t prosecuted for having classified documents a few months ago because a special counsel deemed he wasn’t mentally fit to face trial.
Ssssssh....we don't talk about that...
Or the fact that Hunter Biden, someone who "has the ear" of Joe Biden, took money from a disgraced, criminal Romanian businessman. Hunter also made millions from deals with state-backed Chinese firms and Joe was paid money from his brother with funds originating from a Chinese firm - again state backed.

But again, we don't talk about that.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-bide...

https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/comer-shows-bidens-g...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-54553132
laugh Quoted for posterity. These guys really have lost their way. Fortunately they don’t get to vote in the US so we can cheerily point and laugh. They do however get a say this Thursday which is a concern.
It's okay, keep ignoring the transgressions of "your guy", I'm sure he's 100% straight down the line.
You really have lost your way. Sad. laugh

Wheelspinning

1,344 posts

33 months

thatsprettyshady said:
dvs_dave said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Wheelspinning said:
Beati Dogu said:
Mortarboard said:
For example, under patriot act, an individual could be held indefinitely in somewhere like guantanamo, to prevent them from leaking classified information to enemies.

Like say, someone who had meetings with Putin, wrote letters to north Korea, and had literally boxes of classified information?

Hmmmmmm. wink

M.
And yet Biden wasn’t prosecuted for having classified documents a few months ago because a special counsel deemed he wasn’t mentally fit to face trial.
Ssssssh....we don't talk about that...
Or the fact that Hunter Biden, someone who "has the ear" of Joe Biden, took money from a disgraced, criminal Romanian businessman. Hunter also made millions from deals with state-backed Chinese firms and Joe was paid money from his brother with funds originating from a Chinese firm - again state backed.

But again, we don't talk about that.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-bide...

https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/comer-shows-bidens-g...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-54553132
laugh Quoted for posterity. These guys really have lost their way. Fortunately they don’t get to vote in the US so we can cheerily point and laugh. They do however get a say this Thursday which is a concern.
It's okay, keep ignoring the transgressions of "your guy", I'm sure he's 100% straight down the line.
Biden has to be 100% 'straight down the line', and all the rumours and 'deep fake' clips suggesting that Biden has a serious medical condition are utter rubbish because the Biden faithful on here told us so.

Phew! Glad that's now all sorted out.

thatsprettyshady

2,072 posts

168 months

dvs_dave said:
thatsprettyshady said:
dvs_dave said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Wheelspinning said:
Beati Dogu said:
Mortarboard said:
For example, under patriot act, an individual could be held indefinitely in somewhere like guantanamo, to prevent them from leaking classified information to enemies.

Like say, someone who had meetings with Putin, wrote letters to north Korea, and had literally boxes of classified information?

Hmmmmmm. wink

M.
And yet Biden wasn’t prosecuted for having classified documents a few months ago because a special counsel deemed he wasn’t mentally fit to face trial.
Ssssssh....we don't talk about that...
Or the fact that Hunter Biden, someone who "has the ear" of Joe Biden, took money from a disgraced, criminal Romanian businessman. Hunter also made millions from deals with state-backed Chinese firms and Joe was paid money from his brother with funds originating from a Chinese firm - again state backed.

But again, we don't talk about that.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-bide...

https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/comer-shows-bidens-g...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-54553132
laugh Quoted for posterity. These guys really have lost their way. Fortunately they don’t get to vote in the US so we can cheerily point and laugh. They do however get a say this Thursday which is a concern.
It's okay, keep ignoring the transgressions of "your guy", I'm sure he's 100% straight down the line.
You really have lost your way. Sad. laugh
You posted a picture on the other thread suggesting that Biden should assasinate his political rival, I think we're even.

hidetheelephants

25,947 posts

196 months

thatsprettyshady said:
paulguitar said:
thatsprettyshady said:
paulguitar said:
thatsprettyshady said:
But again, we don't talk about that.
What are you doing now then?


silly
seriously?
You've posted a load of links and said 'we don't talk about that'.

confused
It's was in response to another poster (sarcastically) saying "Shhh, we don't talk about that" regrding Biden's illegal handling of classified documents, I was carrying on the joke with my own "But we don't talk about that".

Really odd that I'm having to explain that.
Neither thing happened, so whether they're funny or not is moot, as is whether anyone talks about them.

Catweazle

1,405 posts

145 months

EddieSteadyGo said:
pinchmeimdreamin said:
thatsprettyshady said:
What is wrong with what he said ?

Is he saying Biden should ?
It's wrong because it is not what the judgement says.

The judgement makes clear unlawful acts, even if performed while in office, do not receive immunity.

The President does gain immunity for actions within the scope of their "conclusive and preclusive" constitutional authority. That constitutional authority is already defined and it doesn't extend to sending Seal teams to kill domestic political rivals.

dvs_dave

8,818 posts

228 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
thatsprettyshady said:
You posted a picture on the other thread suggesting that Biden should assasinate his political rival, I think we're even.
You really don’t get it do you? Oh well, moving on…

iphonedyou

9,319 posts

160 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Pretty shady in that rabbit hole.

Wills2

23,442 posts

178 months

Tuesday
quotequote all

I felt sad watching parts of the debate, Biden's a good man (I feel) and to see him struggling like that with that self serving goon stood there gloating and throwing insults at him whilst just making things up again made me feel sad, but there is no need for this to be happening it's self inflicted by the Bidens and the Democrats.


Durzel

12,354 posts

171 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
I felt sad watching parts of the debate, Biden's a good man (I feel) and to see him struggling like that with that self serving goon stood there gloating and throwing insults at him whilst just making things up again made me feel sad, but there is no need for this to be happening it's self inflicted by the Bidens and the Democrats.
Yeah, it's a crying shame. I saw a video that is doing the rounds showing the difference in Biden from 5 years ago, to today. The 2019 Biden was a table-thumping firebreather, the 2024 one he just looks completely lost. It's more an inditement of how quickly people go downhill when they pass a certain point in their lives, which is sad in and of itself.

As you say though the Democrats have only themselves to blame for orchestrating this outcome. It's basically elder abuse at this point. Like a relative who wants to keep driving and thinks they are still competent, sometimes you have to step in and get their licence taken away for their own good, and in the case of a ailing President - the rest of the country.

sugerbear

4,182 posts

161 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
thatsprettyshady said:
Democrats now asking for election to be postponed indefinitely, in a completely non-dictatorial move.

https://x.com/mmpadellan/status/180778478480799377...

This particular poster was paid $57,000 in 2020 by a left wing PAC.
And to be fair that is exactly what the President is allowed to do according to the recent SCOTUS ruling. Much easier for him would be to declare a state of emergency and just keep that rolling until he is ready to step down.

McGee_22

6,851 posts

182 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
sugerbear said:
And to be fair that is exactly what the President is allowed to do according to the recent SCOTUS ruling. Much easier for him would be to declare a state of emergency and just keep that rolling until he is ready to step down.
You might have said this in jest but with Trump always saying he won't accept the result unless he is declared winner I genuinely think that Pres Biden might have to do something along those lines when the result becomes apparent.

A second Biden Presidency should see him use his new Presidential immunity to fire at least half the SCOTUS and install actual democratic thinking Judges to properly write the terms and especially limits of any Presidential immunity, then accept them into Law whilst still President.

PinkHouse

1,108 posts

60 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
McGee_22 said:
sugerbear said:
And to be fair that is exactly what the President is allowed to do according to the recent SCOTUS ruling. Much easier for him would be to declare a state of emergency and just keep that rolling until he is ready to step down.
You might have said this in jest but with Trump always saying he won't accept the result unless he is declared winner I genuinely think that Pres Biden might have to do something along those lines when the result becomes apparent.

A second Biden Presidency should see him use his new Presidential immunity to fire at least half the SCOTUS and install actual democratic thinking Judges to properly write the terms and especially limits of any Presidential immunity, then accept them into Law whilst still President.
You think the president has the authority to fire a supreme court justice? Which mechanism can he use to achieve this?

skwdenyer

17,132 posts

243 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
McGee_22 said:
sugerbear said:
And to be fair that is exactly what the President is allowed to do according to the recent SCOTUS ruling. Much easier for him would be to declare a state of emergency and just keep that rolling until he is ready to step down.
You might have said this in jest but with Trump always saying he won't accept the result unless he is declared winner I genuinely think that Pres Biden might have to do something along those lines when the result becomes apparent.

A second Biden Presidency should see him use his new Presidential immunity to fire at least half the SCOTUS and install actual democratic thinking Judges to properly write the terms and especially limits of any Presidential immunity, then accept them into Law whilst still President.
I’m not sure how a President can force the firing of a Justice. But assuming it were possible, why shouldn’t Biden just do it now?

LF5335

6,391 posts

46 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
PinkHouse said:
You think the president has the authority to fire a supreme court justice? Which mechanism can he use to achieve this?
The ruling that SCOTUS made means he can do just that. And nobody can question it at all.