45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)
Discussion
McGee_22 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Project2025 is nothing to do with Trump, it can’t be linked to him , it’s not his manifesto, find me one piece of evidence that Trump has endorsed Project 2025 and I’ll be quiet about it.
Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
I didn't ask that - I asked whether you genuinely believed the Trump statement and why?Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 11:31
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
te. Everything the “not” Trump supporters touch...thatsprettyshady said:
Well given what I wrote of course I believe what he said, as there is no evidence confirming otherwise. Other than some connections with Trump related people and peoples opinion I've seen no endorsement of Project 2025 from Trump or his campaign at all. If i see him state he supports or endorses Project 2025 somewhere then yes, i would say he is lying in that statement.
Like not going to change roe v wade, then installing two judges who seriously deceived congress, who promptly overturned it at the first opportunity?Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
That sort of lack of endorsement?
You can see why folk are skeptical. Despite his lack of endorsement, project 2025 is directly out of mapga & the freedom caucus, and senior rnc staff
And for those not convinced
https://www.heritage.org/UnderstandingTrumpism
The plan was there all along. Elect trump, get 2025. Whether you think trumps in favor or not, that's what's coming.
M.
Edited by Mortarboard on Saturday 6th July 15:52
thatsprettyshady said:
Well given what I wrote of course I believe what he said, as there is no evidence confirming otherwise. Other than some connections with Trump related people and peoples opinion I've seen no endorsement of Project 2025 from Trump or his campaign at all. If i see him state he supports or endorses Project 2025 somewhere then yes, i would say he is lying in that statement.
Actions speak louder than words, no?Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 15:21
Project 25 comes out of the Heritage Foundation (who want to ‘institutionalise Trumpism’) and is a direct response to Trumps experience in office and the challenges he faced trying to be President-king.
Trumps behaviour and his attitudes towards what the Presidency should be have not changed - look at all the arguments his team present in various legal battles. Look at his recent gift from the Supreme Court on presidential immunity. He absolutely still wants to be President-king and still feels like this was an opportunity stolen from him.
It really doesn’t matter what he says about Project 25 because it is so blatantly obvious that large elements of Project 25 align completely with actions he has already tried to do or done, expressed aspirations of his, or align completely with arguments him and his team make in court.
‘I know nothing about this strategy for me to get everything I want’ - so what? Let’s say we believe him (which I don’t).
It doesn’t change that he desperately wants all of those things, and conservative legal action groups and his own legal teams have *already* been working to achieve them.
That’s the real problem’
thatsprettyshady said:
All just trying mind reading Trump and opinions. Show me Trump endorsing Project 2025.
He recently said that he doesnt endorse Project 2025 and that he is dead against it. But at the same time he also said that he knew nothing about it - so how can you be against something if you know nothing about it? Mmmm. However, much of what Project 2025 is trying to do is very much aligned with Trump and his threats, sorry promises, for his next term. So while he might not directly support Project 2025, its clear he does know about it, that it aligns with what he trying to do and that its toxic to directly support it, hence the denial.
thatsprettyshady said:
You did.
I see lots of posts here attempting to mind-read Trump saying words to the effect of "I know he said that, but what he really means is this..."
There's plenty of bad stuff he has said/done, but endorsing Project 2025 isn't one of them
You completely missed my point. I thought I was pretty clear that it doesn’t matter whether he even knows about the existence of Project 25, what matters is his actions which totally align with Project 25. I see lots of posts here attempting to mind-read Trump saying words to the effect of "I know he said that, but what he really means is this..."
There's plenty of bad stuff he has said/done, but endorsing Project 2025 isn't one of them
thatsprettyshady said:
McGee_22 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Project2025 is nothing to do with Trump, it can’t be linked to him , it’s not his manifesto, find me one piece of evidence that Trump has endorsed Project 2025 and I’ll be quiet about it.
Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
I didn't ask that - I asked whether you genuinely believed the Trump statement and why?Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 11:31
Real life must be a shock. Such a shame people are sneaky enough to actually dissemble. Byker28i said:
Before any further wild accusations are thrown around, I've had no part in anyones ban. The same can't be said about me receiving many suspensions and bans, not to mention letters to my home threatening my family, a death threat left on my car at PH events, specific direct mentions of family members. Someone even withheld their phone number and made allegations I was a peado to my work...
Yup not just in the US people are radicalised in the cult.
What the actual cockstain?Yup not just in the US people are radicalised in the cult.
Edited by Byker28i on Friday 5th July 06:27
Whoozit said:
thatsprettyshady said:
McGee_22 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Project2025 is nothing to do with Trump, it can’t be linked to him , it’s not his manifesto, find me one piece of evidence that Trump has endorsed Project 2025 and I’ll be quiet about it.
Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
I didn't ask that - I asked whether you genuinely believed the Trump statement and why?Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 11:31
Real life must be a shock. Such a shame people are sneaky enough to actually dissemble. Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
thatsprettyshady said:
Keep hiding behind the sofa scared of the orange man if you wish, but don't forget he's had 4 years aready and (before Covid) he had very strong growth, good job growth and kept inflation in check, not much lunatic behaviour or policy on the presidential side.
Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
Just ignore the whole decimating of women's health and the giving away of the odd batch of intelligence files, eh?Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
And the whole "getbthecriot squad to clear the way for my photo op"
And only 6 dead from an insurrection.....
Sure. Benign sort of fellow.
M.
thatsprettyshady said:
Whoozit said:
thatsprettyshady said:
McGee_22 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Project2025 is nothing to do with Trump, it can’t be linked to him , it’s not his manifesto, find me one piece of evidence that Trump has endorsed Project 2025 and I’ll be quiet about it.
Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
I didn't ask that - I asked whether you genuinely believed the Trump statement and why?Everything posted so far has been posters attempting to be mind readers assuming Trump is enacting it.
One piece of evidence of Trump endorsing it. please.
Edited by thatsprettyshady on Saturday 6th July 11:31
Real life must be a shock. Such a shame people are sneaky enough to actually dissemble. Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
Let's revisit in December if he's in power?Mortarboard said:
thatsprettyshady said:
Keep hiding behind the sofa scared of the orange man if you wish, but don't forget he's had 4 years aready and (before Covid) he had very strong growth, good job growth and kept inflation in check, not much lunatic behaviour or policy on the presidential side.
Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
Just ignore the whole decimating of women's health and the giving away of the odd batch of intelligence files, eh?Tell me this, if he was such an evil dictator, then explain when BLM/Antifa were burning down cities, what did Trump do? He didn't declare martial law, he didn't mobile the army to murder them all, he didnt lock up his political opponents, he didn't occupy cities as some were calling for. The courthouse in Portland was under siege and he never once went heavy handed with them. He didn't stop the violence until it was literally spilling onto the White House lawn. As a dictator/tyrant, he's pretty crap.
And the whole "getbthecriot squad to clear the way for my photo op"
And only 6 dead from an insurrection.....
Sure. Benign sort of fellow.
M.
Funny you should mention intelligence files, didn't the other guy commit a felony by having stolen classified intelligence files strewn around his house? The only reason he didn't get prosecuted for that is the prosecutor felt that the jury would think he's just a silly old man and didn't mean it. They're both felons.
Bill Maher destroyed on Trump/Biden classified docs - https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/17944052641643...
thatsprettyshady said:
There was no insurrection, it was an exceptionally violent riot but let's not pretend it was a serious attempt of an insurrection, no matter what people would like to describe it as. There's no excuse forthe violence but let's be real here - there was no organised (beyond some people) attempt to overthrow or sieze control, and procecutors see it the same way as Trump hasn't been indicted for that.
There's evidence in multiple states about the meetings and plans that took place pre-election, and the multiple meeting and plans pre-jan 6th.Indeed, even the scotus has acknowledged what took place.
thatsprettyshady said:
Funny you should mention intelligence files, didn't the other guy commit a felony by having stolen classified intelligence files strewn around his house? The only reason he didn't get prosecuted for that is the prosecutor felt that the jury would think he's just a silly old man and didn't mean it. They're both felons.
"Good felons, on both sides..."Pretty sure neither Pence nor biden are suspected of giving Intel to hostiles of US allies.
Nor did biden or Pence ship dozens of boxes around the place to hide them....
M.
thatsprettyshady said:
There was no insurrection, it was an exceptionally violent riot but let's not pretend it was a serious attempt of an insurrection, no matter what people would like to describe it as. There's no excuse forthe violence but let's be real here - there was no organised (beyond some people) attempt to overthrow or sieze control, and procecutors see it the same way as Trump hasn't been indicted for that.
Funny you should mention intelligence files, didn't the other guy commit a felony by having stolen classified intelligence files strewn around his house? The only reason he didn't get prosecuted for that is the prosecutor felt that the jury would think he's just a silly old man and didn't mean it. They're both felons.
Little point engaging further with this one. Completely lost to the cult and guzzling the Kool-Aid.Funny you should mention intelligence files, didn't the other guy commit a felony by having stolen classified intelligence files strewn around his house? The only reason he didn't get prosecuted for that is the prosecutor felt that the jury would think he's just a silly old man and didn't mean it. They're both felons.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff