45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)
Discussion
98elise said:
LF5335 said:
thatsprettyshady said:
People should be allowed to protest what they want, there’s nothing wrong with that as long as it doesn’t turn into hate.
Not sure that’s accurate. Should all the paedos be allowed to protest to support their position? Or murderers being allowed to protest that they should be allowed to commit murder freely.
I know that’s a ridiculous, but that’s what you’re claiming.
If that wasn't the case then being gay would still be illegal.
If all the far right did was march with a bit of hootin' and a hollerin' then they could do that all day and we'd just ignore them like the fools they are.
The problem with the far right is that violence to achieve political aims is not just considered acceptable, it's considered a first resort. It's called "direct action" and is a key tenet of Fascism. Where the far right goes, violence often follows.
If we're talking about Islamists (who are also, notably far right) we'd call that terrorism.
Speed 3 said:
Wow. ChocolateFrog said:
I assume there's much less derision and mockery when you suggest Trump will get in in November if you suggest it now rather than 6 months ago?
Odds must be narrowing considerably surely. OR, this being pushed that much closer to the election will make more people remember to vote against him at the time?
p1stonhead said:
Odds must be narrowing considerably surely.
They’ve not changed since directly after the debate. All this stuff in the last 24 hours might actually be a wake up call to some folk, a bit like Roe vs Wade. Still a loooong way to go until November, I’m not really sure why they had that debate so early.p1stonhead said:
ChocolateFrog said:
I assume there's much less derision and mockery when you suggest Trump will get in in November if you suggest it now rather than 6 months ago?
Odds must be narrowing considerably surely. OR, this being pushed that much closer to the election will make more people remember to vote against him at the time?
In my mind, it's another hail Mary attempt. But still needs to be reviewed, no matter how asinine. But assuming it's decided "immunity not applicable, etc", then sentencing in the middle of September is bad for trump. No ti.e to have appeal heard before November.
M.
Yesterday's ludicrous decision by the Supreme Court, while terrible for democracy, was a godsend for the Biden campaign. Many people who were discouraged by the debate are now energized by this.
Keep your eye on the prize. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. If Biden wins those 3 states he's re elected.
Keep your eye on the prize. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. If Biden wins those 3 states he's re elected.
LF5335 said:
This goes two ways
Trump wins and all the worst case scenario doomsday stuff becomes reality
Biden wins. The whole US landscape changes and fundamental changes are made to ensure that nobody can ever become king or dictator and everyone is answerable for their actions.
Maybe he should get on that now before the election….Trump wins and all the worst case scenario doomsday stuff becomes reality
Biden wins. The whole US landscape changes and fundamental changes are made to ensure that nobody can ever become king or dictator and everyone is answerable for their actions.
LF5335 said:
This goes two ways
Trump wins and all the worst case scenario doomsday stuff becomes reality
Biden wins. The whole US landscape changes and fundamental changes are made to ensure that nobody can ever become king or dictator and everyone is answerable for their actions.
That would depend on the makeup of Congress, not just the President. Trump wins and all the worst case scenario doomsday stuff becomes reality
Biden wins. The whole US landscape changes and fundamental changes are made to ensure that nobody can ever become king or dictator and everyone is answerable for their actions.
ChocolateFrog said:
I assume there's much less derision and mockery when you suggest Trump will get in in November if you suggest it now rather than 6 months ago?
See this post, right here, is a perfect example of the problems with political discourse.Nobody derided, or mocked those that were saying Trump would win. They simply said that they didn't believe it was likely.
But you come along going "oh derision and mockery" because you're looking to stir up trouble. It's transparent, and pathetic.
Somebody giving a counter argument is not derision, or mockery.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff