45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)

45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)

Author
Discussion

essayer

9,239 posts

197 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
So Watergate was legal all along

Mortarboard

6,577 posts

58 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
p1stonhead said:
I think Trump might scrape it.

Doesn’t the election actually take place in 6 swing states by about 100,000 people?

It’s such a crazy system the US runs.
Michigan. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania.

If Biden wins those 3 states he's re elected.
Plus, between cannon amd the scotus, there might be more traditional rep voters inclined to vote D, or abstain.

Certainly, there will be a very big push now to retain senate, and perhaps regain the house for the dems.

A few sympathetic Rs in the senate, and a 60 vote may be on the table.

M.

Countdown

40,579 posts

199 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Mortarboard said:
unrepentant said:
p1stonhead said:
I think Trump might scrape it.

Doesn’t the election actually take place in 6 swing states by about 100,000 people?

It’s such a crazy system the US runs.
Michigan. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania.

If Biden wins those 3 states he's re elected.
Plus, between cannon amd the scotus, there might be more traditional rep voters inclined to vote D, or abstain.

Certainly, there will be a very big push now to retain senate, and perhaps regain the house for the dems.

A few sympathetic Rs in the senate, and a 60 vote may be on the table.

M.
Sorry MB but that's massive wishful thinking.

NRS

22,502 posts

204 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
thatsprettyshady said:
dvs_dave said:
It didn't take anyone very long to suggest Biden should use this ruling to assasinate political rivals, stay classy.
It’s obviously a joke, but it’s relevant. Because he absolutely could now and it’s legal.
How? Give an example where it would be legal?

The ruling should be bigger than Trump and Biden, since those lots are nutters who tend to stick to the past no matter how stupid things are. It in theory should stop Trump going after Biden if Trump wins the next election for example, which quite a few have highlighted as a risk.

Mortarboard

6,577 posts

58 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Sorry MB but that's massive wishful thinking.
Oh I know. Million to one chance and all that biggrin

But in the event of Trump getting his hands on the presidency again, I fully expect a backlash of at least the magnitude of the pussy marches, along with Pelosi et al doing their damndest to frustrate things as much as possible.

Things could get real ugly, real fast.

M.

unrepentant

21,400 posts

259 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Mortarboard said:
unrepentant said:
p1stonhead said:
I think Trump might scrape it.

Doesn’t the election actually take place in 6 swing states by about 100,000 people?

It’s such a crazy system the US runs.
Michigan. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania.

If Biden wins those 3 states he's re elected.
Plus, between cannon amd the scotus, there might be more traditional rep voters inclined to vote D, or abstain.

Certainly, there will be a very big push now to retain senate, and perhaps regain the house for the dems.

A few sympathetic Rs in the senate, and a 60 vote may be on the table.

M.
I think holding the Senate at 51 would be a good effort. I do think there's a very good chance that the Dems will take back the House. I think if they hold the Senate and take back the House there will be pressure to end the filibuster, codify Roe and expand the court. Biden has said in the past he doesn't want to expand the court but after this clearly something needs to be done.

LF5335

6,558 posts

46 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
NRS said:
How? Give an example where it would be legal?

The ruling should be bigger than Trump and Biden, since those lots are nutters who tend to stick to the past no matter how stupid things are. It in theory should stop Trump going after Biden if Trump wins the next election for example, which quite a few have highlighted as a risk.
Sonja Sotomayor who just happens to be one of Supreme Court justices sees it as legal. I’d take her knowledge and concern over this ruling over your “not a Trump supporter, but …” position on everything.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/j...

dobbo_

14,616 posts

251 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
thatsprettyshady said:
dvs_dave said:
It didn't take anyone very long to suggest Biden should use this ruling to assasinate political rivals, stay classy.
"Stay classy" lol

Your boy has constantly expressed a desire to assasinate or murder people he doesn't like. Keep clutching those pearls though.

NRS

22,502 posts

204 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
LF5335 said:
NRS said:
How? Give an example where it would be legal?

The ruling should be bigger than Trump and Biden, since those lots are nutters who tend to stick to the past no matter how stupid things are. It in theory should stop Trump going after Biden if Trump wins the next election for example, which quite a few have highlighted as a risk.
Sonja Sotomayor who just happens to be one of Supreme Court justices sees it as legal. I’d take her knowledge and concern over this ruling over your “not a Trump supporter, but …” position on everything.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/j...
You are ridiculous with your insinuations.

The action of the president would be tested in a court of law to see if it was personal or official duty, that is the new ruling. You’d need a corrupt judge to approve an assassination of a political rival, as it clearly would be personal. And if you have a judge in your pocket then you don’t need this ruling anyway. They can just do highly dubious rulings like Cannon has been doing to help Trump out try and avoid the prison time he should face.

This does not say the President will not face a court room for decisions they make, it says it would go to court to decide between the two. That as I said will also in theory stop Trump going after Biden in revenge, which he would almost certainly try if he gets into power. That’s why I’m saying it is a wider picture issue, not just the immediate situation with Trump now.

It’s the same for the filibuster and the stacking of the Supreme Court. The Dems could do it, but if they’re out of power in future and trying to slow down Trump doing evil st and the filibuster is gone it will have consequences far beyond the current situation. Same for stacking the court, expect the GOP to return serve when they get into power in future.

But of course, all of this is because I’m a massive Trump fan…

RustyMX5

7,990 posts

220 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
1933 here we come

LF5335

6,558 posts

46 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
NRS said:
You are ridiculous with your insinuations.

The action of the president would be tested in a court of law to see if it was personal or official duty, that is the new ruling. You’d need a corrupt judge to approve an assassination of a political rival, as it clearly would be personal. And if you have a judge in your pocket then you don’t need this ruling anyway. They can just do highly dubious rulings like Cannon has been doing to help Trump out try and avoid the prison time he should face.

This does not say the President will not face a court room for decisions they make, it says it would go to court to decide between the two. That as I said will also in theory stop Trump going after Biden in revenge, which he would almost certainly try if he gets into power. That’s why I’m saying it is a wider picture issue, not just the immediate situation with Trump now.

It’s the same for the filibuster and the stacking of the Supreme Court. The Dems could do it, but if they’re out of power in future and trying to slow down Trump doing evil st and the filibuster is gone it will have consequences far beyond the current situation. Same for stacking the court, expect the GOP to return serve when they get into power in future.

But of course, all of this is because I’m a massive Trump fan…
Trump orders Biden to be killed. A sitting President can’t be prosecuted, so he’s in the clear for at least four years. Then it gets argued in a court whether it was legal or not. Then it eventually after years and years makes its way to the Supreme Court, who will find it was OK after all. Even if they don’t Biden is still dead.

Nothing will stop Trump going after anyone that he wants to. If Trump gets re-elected there will be States refusing to follow or allow Presidential orders to be carried out on their soil.

robscot

2,360 posts

193 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
For those banging on about Seal Team 6 assassinating political rivals etc or similar being disgusting etc ...

Read bottom of page 29 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939...

Mortarboard

6,577 posts

58 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
robscot said:
For those banging on about Seal Team 6 assassinating political rivals etc or similar being disgusting etc ...

Read bottom of page 29 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939...
That's the catch22 for the ruling.
If denying certain, specific state's electoral college votes is "official bizznizz" and therefore legal, there's nothing to stop biden simply handwaving away red states votes.

If it was Clinton instead of Biden, I'd put money on him doing just that, in order to force the issue.
Biden is too much of a traditionalist to do so, however.

M.

Wheelspinning

1,450 posts

33 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
LF5335 said:
Trump orders Biden to be killed. A sitting President can’t be prosecuted, so he’s in the clear for at least four years. Then it gets argued in a court whether it was legal or not. Then it eventually after years and years makes its way to the Supreme Court, who will find it was OK after all. Even if they don’t Biden is still dead.

Nothing will stop Trump going after anyone that he wants to. If Trump gets re-elected there will be States refusing to follow or allow Presidential orders to be carried out on their soil.
OK. Put the tinfoil hats away folks.

We now have the winning post on this thread woohoo



LF5335

6,558 posts

46 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Wheelspinning said:
OK. Put the tinfoil hats away folks.

We now have the winning post on this thread woohoo
You really are a loathsome little troll aren’t you.

Mortarboard

6,577 posts

58 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Wheelspinning said:
OK. Put the tinfoil hats away folks.

We now have the winning post on this thread woohoo
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/blame-abc-news-finds-17-cases-invoking-trump/story?id=58912889

Yup, nothing to see here. rolleyes

M.

F1GTRUeno

6,465 posts

221 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Mortarboard said:
Oh I know. Million to one chance and all that biggrin

But in the event of Trump getting his hands on the presidency again, I fully expect a backlash of at least the magnitude of the pussy marches, along with Pelosi et al doing their damndest to frustrate things as much as possible.

Things could get real ugly, real fast.

M.
You really think the Republis are scared of Pelosi trying to get in the way or a bunch of people marching in the streets?

Short of a full scale civil war (which I guess you're referring to with it getting ugly) they won't be bothered in the slightest by anyone getting in their way, they're obviously not now.

dobbo_

14,616 posts

251 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
LF5335 said:
Trump orders Biden to be killed. A sitting President can’t be prosecuted, so he’s in the clear for at least four years. Then it gets argued in a court whether it was legal or not.
Or the next President just orders the judge to be killed and the court is rendered irrelevant.

LF5335

6,558 posts

46 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
dobbo_ said:
Or the next President just orders the judge to be killed and the court is rendered irrelevant.
Good point.

Mortarboard

6,577 posts

58 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
You really think the Republis are scared of Pelosi trying to get in the way or a bunch of people marching in the streets?

Short of a full scale civil war (which I guess you're referring to with it getting ugly) they won't be bothered in the slightest by anyone getting in their way, they're obviously not now.
Not civil war, no. There's not enough loons, even in the US in the current climate.

But pussy march, antfa etc
Fillibuster everything
No appointment hearings
State cases out the wazoo

If the GOP are determined to weaponize everything, we'll end up with the democrats' version of maga, along with the magaloons. Ugly ugly ugly
Tit for tat actions for years

M.