45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)
Discussion
Byker28i said:
Fox doing their best on trump messaging
Hannity doing his best for trump, claiming the CNN moderators are biased
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805771026451906603
'Biased' in this case meaning 'vaguely intelligent'. Hannity doing his best for trump, claiming the CNN moderators are biased
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805771026451906603
LF5335 said:
It’s worth reading the comments under Stormy Daniel’s tweet. Whilst there’s a lot of support, the sheer volume of opposition to her is quite scary. This shows that there a still a huge amount of idiots suckered into Trump’s grift and they aren’t moving position.
Roll on the debate and Trump’s no-show. At least that’s what I’m predicting.
Twitter since Musk took over has veered hard hard to the right - it's interesting that it was on the whole a platform that was considered "left" or "woke" but Musk has certainly changed that.Roll on the debate and Trump’s no-show. At least that’s what I’m predicting.
There were always those comments - on the whole they were ignored, or derided - but now they are pushed to the top so you see them first. Them blue tick $8 a month folks are getting seen now.
Blackpuddin said:
Byker28i said:
Fox doing their best on trump messaging
Hannity doing his best for trump, claiming the CNN moderators are biased
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805771026451906603
'Biased' in this case meaning 'vaguely intelligent'. Hannity doing his best for trump, claiming the CNN moderators are biased
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805771026451906603
LF5335 said:
It’s worth reading the comments under Stormy Daniel’s tweet. Whilst there’s a lot of support, the sheer volume of opposition to her is quite scary. This shows that there a still a huge amount of idiots suckered into Trump’s grift and they aren’t moving position.
Roll on the debate and Trump’s no-show. At least that’s what I’m predicting.
How many of those responding to her are real accounts though?Roll on the debate and Trump’s no-show. At least that’s what I’m predicting.
mikeiow said:
PinkHouse said:
Byker28i said:
Anne Hathaway on why trump’s overturning Roe v. Wade is against womens rights
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
Trump must be the most powerful president ever since he's also seemingly the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
You do know he boasted how they broke Roe v Wade, right?
Plenty of sources for you to go check that: here’s just one of MANY: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/12/do...
Yet you pop in here to foam whataboutery and nonsense.
Present some positive information to help people: explain why you feel Trump is the right man for #47
I delve into Truth Social from time to time, mostly to berate the tangerine turd and his team, & the one thing I find is that his supporters have pretty well zero ability to explain why they follow his ravings.
The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
PinkHouse said:
You might lash out and call me a troll but for a place that claims to hold the intellectual and moral high ground, saying that Trump overturned Roe v Wade isn't a good look.
The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
trump has repeatedly taken 'credit' for the overturning of Roe v Wade. The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
g4ry13 said:
h0b0 said:
Byker28i said:
16 Nobel Prize-winning economists are warning that a trump second-term would create an "inflation bomb" that would rock the global economy.
That a combination of more tax cuts for corporations, a labor shortage caused by the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, and looser monetary policy in the form of lower interest rates would cause prices to skyrocket yet again just as inflation has started to stabilize in the three percent range.
"We believe that a second Trump term would have a negative impact on the U.S.'s economic standing in the world, and a destabilizing effect on the U.S.'s domestic economy,"
This after trump ran up a record amount of debt in just four years of his term.
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/25/nobel-prize-winne...
A couple of days ago we all agreed that Biden did not impact inflation especially international inflation because only dumb people would think that.. Now, we have a post saying Trump is going to impact inflation. You can't have it both ways.That a combination of more tax cuts for corporations, a labor shortage caused by the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, and looser monetary policy in the form of lower interest rates would cause prices to skyrocket yet again just as inflation has started to stabilize in the three percent range.
"We believe that a second Trump term would have a negative impact on the U.S.'s economic standing in the world, and a destabilizing effect on the U.S.'s domestic economy,"
This after trump ran up a record amount of debt in just four years of his term.
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/25/nobel-prize-winne...
This is just one of many posts that have created the overall tone in this thread that goes beyond being anti Trump. Many observers have pointed this out but have been shot down as Trump supporters.
Being critical of the thread content has now turned into being a Trump supporter. As ever, and due to the thread culture, not a Trump supporter and would vote Biden if that was the choice. However, I would prefer a better selection to choose from.
paulguitar said:
PinkHouse said:
You might lash out and call me a troll but for a place that claims to hold the intellectual and moral high ground, saying that Trump overturned Roe v Wade isn't a good look.
The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
trump has repeatedly taken 'credit' for the overturning of Roe v Wade. The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
PinkHouse said:
Of course he enabled it and that's not in dispute, the quote was stating that Trump overturned it himself. It's a bit of a semantic argument I admit
If he keeps claiming credit for it, then why shouldn’t he get the credit for doing it? Or is it doublethink hypocrisy from you now? PinkHouse said:
mikeiow said:
PinkHouse said:
Byker28i said:
Anne Hathaway on why trump’s overturning Roe v. Wade is against womens rights
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
Trump must be the most powerful president ever since he's also seemingly the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
You do know he boasted how they broke Roe v Wade, right?
Plenty of sources for you to go check that: here’s just one of MANY: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/12/do...
Yet you pop in here to foam whataboutery and nonsense.
Present some positive information to help people: explain why you feel Trump is the right man for #47
I delve into Truth Social from time to time, mostly to berate the tangerine turd and his team, & the one thing I find is that his supporters have pretty well zero ability to explain why they follow his ravings.
The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
They also seem to have a problem understanding who can vote. Illegal immigrants can't vote. Even I know that and I would guess most 12 year olds do?
Maybe you could get a 12 year old to explain it to Trump.
PinkHouse said:
mikeiow said:
PinkHouse said:
Byker28i said:
Anne Hathaway on why trump’s overturning Roe v. Wade is against womens rights
https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
Trump must be the most powerful president ever since he's also seemingly the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court https://twitter.com/i/status/1805735122789957733
You do know he boasted how they broke Roe v Wade, right?
Plenty of sources for you to go check that: here’s just one of MANY: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/12/do...
Yet you pop in here to foam whataboutery and nonsense.
Present some positive information to help people: explain why you feel Trump is the right man for #47
I delve into Truth Social from time to time, mostly to berate the tangerine turd and his team, & the one thing I find is that his supporters have pretty well zero ability to explain why they follow his ravings.
The three branches of government are usually explained in 7th to 8th grade, so 12 year old kids usually have a grasp of that concept. Separating facts from emotions in disagreements to avoid lashing out is taught to kids even younger and by the age of 7 there is also usually a good grasp of that concept.
Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, 14 states have total or near-total bans on abortion, including Alabama, Texas, Idaho and Tennessee. whilst arguing your whataboutism you have consistantly ignored that this isn't a good thing.
SB8, the Republican-backed Texas law that banned abortions in early pregnancy, is associated with a stark increase in infant and newborn deaths, a study published in JAMA Pediatrics found.
Infant deaths in Texas rose by nearly 13% the year after SB8 was passed.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/texas-a...
Of course we see this whataboutism all the time that bad news comes out about trump, such as yesterdays release of the details of trump lawyer Corcorans notes showing trump knew full well about his obstruction over the stolen classified documents.
Some of the documents at magalardo are are so secret, the federal govt isn't even using them as evidence because they don’t want people even in the court system to see them. These of course are the ones trump wanted disclosed in his efforts to get the govt to drop the case. Threatening national security for personal gain.
How the photos showed there was literally a copier in the same room as some of the docs, and of course stored insecurely
Or perhaps why again trump won't release his tax returns whilst running, won't release his finances.
Some of the documents at magalardo are are so secret, the federal govt isn't even using them as evidence because they don’t want people even in the court system to see them. These of course are the ones trump wanted disclosed in his efforts to get the govt to drop the case. Threatening national security for personal gain.
How the photos showed there was literally a copier in the same room as some of the docs, and of course stored insecurely
Or perhaps why again trump won't release his tax returns whilst running, won't release his finances.
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 26th June 11:16
hidetheelephants said:
TFG nominated judges solely on the recommendation of the Federalist Society, which in turn picked judges mainly on them being very conservative and likely to overturn Roe v Wade. Did TFG overturn Roe v Wade? No, but he enabled it happening.
That's the way "not" Trump supporters need to argue. They try to use the details to ignore the facts and reality of what actually happened.
This behaviour is epitomised by the bleach drinking incident. Th "not" Trump supporters will whine themselves blue in the face saying "show me where he actually said that, show me the exact words" as some kind of gotcha, ignoring the fact that there was a significant uptick in people turning up at emergency due to ingesting bleach.
Apparently Pink thinks this is someone suitable to be potus
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/...
if he can ignore the debts run up, the cronyism, the sexual assaults, rape, most indicted,most impeachments, convicted criminal felon, selling US policy for personal profit etc etc
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/...
if he can ignore the debts run up, the cronyism, the sexual assaults, rape, most indicted,most impeachments, convicted criminal felon, selling US policy for personal profit etc etc
dobbo_ said:
Well no, because you just posted about it?
But yeah big gains in the past 24 hours, be interesting to know why - bullish expectation he'll get elected?
It hit rock bottom at $22 so people taking a punt?But yeah big gains in the past 24 hours, be interesting to know why - bullish expectation he'll get elected?
Many are still warning about the absurd valuation, like LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman
https://fortune.com/2024/06/25/trump-truth-social-...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff