“National Conservatism”
Discussion
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Eric Mc said:
Can you explain to me, what the difference is between an ordinary "Conservative" and a "National Conservative"?
I don't own the terms, and there's no catch all definition as far as I know. My take on it would be that national conservatism has a greater emphasis on the nation as a political and social unit where as mainstream conservatism as represented by the current centre right are apparently comfortable with a much higher degree of internationalism. What do you think?What they call themselves matters not. A wolf in sheeps clothing is still a wolf.
Jesus, this makes grim reading
Their "principles"
https://twitter.com/Otto_English/status/1658513414...
https://twitter.com/neillhope/status/1658515683297...
These NatCs are an American import using UK useful idiots
Their "principles"
https://twitter.com/Otto_English/status/1658513414...
https://twitter.com/neillhope/status/1658515683297...
These NatCs are an American import using UK useful idiots
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Lots of stupidness here, but they seem to have hit a nerve. I wonder if it's the idea of a society which reproduces or one that has a religion which grates the most?
They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
They actually an USA think tank using local UK useful idiots They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Lots of stupidness here, but they seem to have hit a nerve. I wonder if it's the idea of a society which reproduces or one that has a religion which grates the most?
They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
No one is buying what you're selling.They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
I actually couldn't care less what a bunch of American religious extremists think. It's not like they're especially unusual.What does concern me is that they are sponsoring a set of high-profile UK politicians and that unless we make sure their agenda is fully exposed, people might think that they're just a moderately right-wing concern like UKIP.
pequod said:
Gary C said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Sounds a bit like errm nationalism and conservatism to me, cunningly hidden behind the name National Conservatism. Do you really think such ideas are wildly outside the range of acceptable views?
Range of views, of courseRange of acceptable views, now that's a different question and for myself in the UK, yes they seem widely outside my range of acceptable views
I would always tend to say no, they should not be banned.
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
Btw, the British saved the Beetle factory, so it's our fault!
Cheerio...
GetCarter said:
'Fruitcakes'!Do we also label the ScotNats similarly?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff