“National Conservatism”

Author
Discussion

pequod

8,997 posts

144 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.

I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?

TTwiggy

11,618 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.

I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
Ok then, here's a thought experiment. With the benefit of hindsight, had it been possible to stop Hitler and his gang around about 1934-5, do you think life might have been rather better for a large number of people?

Rivenink

3,936 posts

112 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Eric Mc said:
Can you explain to me, what the difference is between an ordinary "Conservative" and a "National Conservative"?
I don't own the terms, and there's no catch all definition as far as I know. My take on it would be that national conservatism has a greater emphasis on the nation as a political and social unit where as mainstream conservatism as represented by the current centre right are apparently comfortable with a much higher degree of internationalism. What do you think?
Seems to me that they're a bunch of religious extremists who want to force others to live a prescribed lifestyle using Government policy and law.

What they call themselves matters not. A wolf in sheeps clothing is still a wolf.


cirian75

4,342 posts

239 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
Jesus, this makes grim reading

Their "principles"

https://twitter.com/Otto_English/status/1658513414...

https://twitter.com/neillhope/status/1658515683297...

These NatCs are an American import using UK useful idiots

JuanCarlosFandango

8,149 posts

77 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
Lots of stupidness here, but they seem to have hit a nerve. I wonder if it's the idea of a society which reproduces or one that has a religion which grates the most?

They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?

bitchstewie

54,479 posts

216 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
Eight pages on these assholes special little club.

Bloody hell.

cirian75

4,342 posts

239 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Lots of stupidness here, but they seem to have hit a nerve. I wonder if it's the idea of a society which reproduces or one that has a religion which grates the most?

They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
They actually an USA think tank using local UK useful idiots

gregs656

11,205 posts

187 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Lots of stupidness here, but they seem to have hit a nerve. I wonder if it's the idea of a society which reproduces or one that has a religion which grates the most?

They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
No one is buying what you're selling.

pequod

8,997 posts

144 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.

I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
Ok then, here's a thought experiment. With the benefit of hindsight, had it been possible to stop Hitler and his gang around about 1934-5, do you think life might have been rather better for a large number of people?
Sadly, the Beetle wouldn't have been developed and the fabulous, rear-engined, machines which derived their existence from that volks wagen would be unknown, and we would be still driving something or other from Morris or possibly a GAZ-M20 Pobeda?

otolith

Original Poster:

58,399 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
They actually an USA think tank using local UK useful idiots
Including keynote speeches from two cabinet ministers and one recent cabinet minister and speeches from three MPs.

deckster

9,631 posts

261 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
They're a nationalist conservative think tank. What sort of views would anyone expect them to hold?
I actually couldn't care less what a bunch of American religious extremists think. It's not like they're especially unusual.

What does concern me is that they are sponsoring a set of high-profile UK politicians and that unless we make sure their agenda is fully exposed, people might think that they're just a moderately right-wing concern like UKIP.

Gary C

13,024 posts

185 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
pequod said:
Gary C said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Sounds a bit like errm nationalism and conservatism to me, cunningly hidden behind the name National Conservatism. Do you really think such ideas are wildly outside the range of acceptable views?
Range of views, of course

Range of acceptable views, now that's a different question and for myself in the UK, yes they seem widely outside my range of acceptable views
Should they be banned from expressing these views?
Now there's a question.

I would always tend to say no, they should not be banned.

TTwiggy

11,618 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.

I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
Ok then, here's a thought experiment. With the benefit of hindsight, had it been possible to stop Hitler and his gang around about 1934-5, do you think life might have been rather better for a large number of people?
Sadly, the Beetle wouldn't have been developed and the fabulous, rear-engined, machines which derived their existence from that volks wagen would be unknown, and we would be still driving something or other from Morris or possibly a GAZ-M20 Pobeda?
While on the flip side, 6 million Jews plus an awful lot of other 'lesser people' wouldn't have been murdered. So, swings and roundabouts eh?

smn159

13,315 posts

223 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
they seem to have hit a nerve.
That does seem to have become the default argument of apologists for culture war stupidity.

Deserves an NP&E bingo entry

otolith

Original Poster:

58,399 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
I think the Tories have the same problem with these people that Labour had with Militant Tendency, and will end up having to do the same thing about it.

pequod

8,997 posts

144 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
pequod said:
TTwiggy said:
Nah, you're reaching here. There's nothing in what I've said to give you a 'clear' indication at all. In fact, I actually said that my natural reaction is that they shouldn't be banned, so you can stop stroking your chin like you think you've 'got me'.
Dear boy, I'm not here to stroke my beard or to score points.

I'm merely offering an opinion as a member of PH, whether that is acceptable or not in NP&E, is neither here nor there, yet debate is important doncha think?
Ok then, here's a thought experiment. With the benefit of hindsight, had it been possible to stop Hitler and his gang around about 1934-5, do you think life might have been rather better for a large number of people?
Sadly, the Beetle wouldn't have been developed and the fabulous, rear-engined, machines which derived their existence from that volks wagen would be unknown, and we would be still driving something or other from Morris or possibly a GAZ-M20 Pobeda?
While on the flip side, 6 million Jews plus an awful lot of other 'lesser people' wouldn't have been murdered. So, swings and roundabouts eh?
Ah, you wish to conflate!

Btw, the British saved the Beetle factory, so it's our fault!

Cheerio...wavey

GetCarter

29,559 posts

285 months

dudleybloke

20,368 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
Have they decided on a shirt colour yet?

pequod

8,997 posts

144 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
'Fruitcakes'!

Do we also label the ScotNats similarly?

oyster

12,821 posts

254 months

Tuesday 16th May 2023
quotequote all
The biggest irony is seeing people who often bang on about freedom, now espousing the views of ultra-restriction fanatics.

Immigration is one thing, but these people are homophobes, which makes them scum.