Climate change - the POLITICAL debate (Vol 7)

[durbster]

Essarell said:

durbster said:

Oops.

If the science is settled why didn’t you highlight “possible”?

Here you go

misrepresented paper said:

Possible important physical drivers for the transitions include change in sea ice, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels or volcanic events.

[Essarell]

durbster said:

Essarell said:

We’re a molten rock hurtling thru an ever expanding universe, our time on earth is mere bagatelle in relation to the age of the planet.

You’re caught up in an unscientific, virtue signalling nirvana, I hope time is on our side to un-cloak this sham.

Oh and jet-setting David “gorilla bothering” Attenborough should have stayed retired.

I'm afraid I have no idea what you're on about but since you've inexplicably started a virtue-signalling rant about BBC presenter, is it fair to say you can't answer why you think people would move to Alaska?

I tell you what, I’m going there next month, if it’s any good and worth a consideration to these climate refugees I’ll answer your question in full

[Diderot]

durbster said:

Essarell said:

durbster said:

Essarell said:

Climate migration? Surely we should see humans moving to Scandinavia and Alaska? You know, get in quick and snap up the cheap land / property? Instead areas that are booming are Dubai, Florida & Texas……

Why do you think they would move to Scandinavia and Alaska?

The CC narrative is that areas of our molten lava cored rock which is currently and briefly occupied by humans will become unliveable. Vis a vis you’d hedge your bets that the only way to avoid (the inevitable extinction) would be to move to areas of of planet that are currently cold and according to that loon at the EU and David Attenborough are warming at an alarming rate. Its survival of the fittest? Or is that the planet isn’t actually becoming unliveable and is in fact thriving?

Where you been the last few decades?

I've been in reality, where none of this is true. How about you?

What’s not true? Predictions of 1.2 billions climate fugees by 2050?

[Essarell]

Diderot said:

durbster said:

Essarell said:

durbster said:

Essarell said:

Climate migration? Surely we should see humans moving to Scandinavia and Alaska? You know, get in quick and snap up the cheap land / property? Instead areas that are booming are Dubai, Florida & Texas……

Why do you think they would move to Scandinavia and Alaska?

The CC narrative is that areas of our molten lava cored rock which is currently and briefly occupied by humans will become unliveable. Vis a vis you’d hedge your bets that the only way to avoid (the inevitable extinction) would be to move to areas of of planet that are currently cold and according to that loon at the EU and David Attenborough are warming at an alarming rate. Its survival of the fittest? Or is that the planet isn’t actually becoming unliveable and is in fact thriving?

Where you been the last few decades?

I've been in reality, where none of this is true. How about you?

What’s not true? Predictions of 1.2 billions climate fugees by 2050?

You’ve spelt economic migrants wrong

[turbobloke]

Climate politics viewpoint from RFK Jr: carbon fundamentalism has hijacked the environmental movement, Biden’s climate policies are top-down totalitarian controls with boondoggles to go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxDnfwWAC84

[Diderot]

Essarell said:

Diderot said:

durbster said:

Essarell said:

durbster said:

Essarell said:

Climate migration? Surely we should see humans moving to Scandinavia and Alaska? You know, get in quick and snap up the cheap land / property? Instead areas that are booming are Dubai, Florida & Texas……

Why do you think they would move to Scandinavia and Alaska?

The CC narrative is that areas of our molten lava cored rock which is currently and briefly occupied by humans will become unliveable. Vis a vis you’d hedge your bets that the only way to avoid (the inevitable extinction) would be to move to areas of of planet that are currently cold and according to that loon at the EU and David Attenborough are warming at an alarming rate. Its survival of the fittest? Or is that the planet isn’t actually becoming unliveable and is in fact thriving?

Where you been the last few decades?

I've been in reality, where none of this is true. How about you?

What’s not true? Predictions of 1.2 billions climate fugees by 2050?

You’ve spelt economic migrants wrong

.

[robinessex]

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

[mko9]

That is no fooling around, that is a legitimate security concern at a major international airport. The fact that anyone got anywhere near an actual aircraft inside a controlled area is ludicrous. Everyone working tarmac security at Stanstead should be fired.

[turbobloke]

What did they leave - if anything other than splodges of orange, I'd wager 'see us at Davos' wasn't included.

[donkmeister]

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

[turbobloke]

donkmeister said:

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

It can be a matter of timing. A report can appear at a point after a comment is made.

[robinessex]

donkmeister said:

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

[robinessex]

donkmeister said:

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

A search on the Beeb website using "Stansted" and "Stop OIl" both returns a zero result, ditto using Google.

Edited by robinessex on Saturday 22 June 09:13

[Diderot]

turbobloke said:

donkmeister said:

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

It can be a matter of timing. A report can appear at a point after a comment is made.

It’s not showing for me on the website (on my iPad) right now. Not in the Clmate or news section. Searched for Taylor Swift, nothing. Searched JSO, the latest article is about the pricks trying to damage Stonehenge.

[Diderot]

Just found it, under ‘England’; headline is ‘two women charged after jets sprayed with paint’.

[turbobloke]

Diderot said:

turbobloke said:

donkmeister said:

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not one word... Apart from the BBC article about it, and the follow up that names the two suspects.

Seriously, every time. "Well it wasn't on MY feed", so bloody look for it then.

Also, just because something isn't reported doesn't mean a conspiracy to hide the news; the Morning Star didn't report on Thatcher's death on the day it happened, which I found very surprising. Turned out they were just crap, and the day after they'd done all their articles about how her pubes were made of barbed wire and she ate orphans or something.

It can be a matter of timing. A report can appear at a point after a comment is made.

It’s not showing for me on the website (on my iPad) right now. Not in the Clmate or news section. Searched for Taylor Swift, nothing. Searched JSO, the latest article is about the pricks trying to damage Stonehenge.

Not showing here either. It's possible an activist tickled Rowlatt's belly and the article vanished, as per Jo Abbess influencing Harrabin's headline using pester power, possible but unlikely.

ETA well spotted.

[swisstoni]

I’ve entered reasonable searches into the app and the website and can’t find.
(I found a fair few historical stories about paint protests).

Odd because the protestors happily filmed themselves in the act and published.

[mike9009]

robinessex said:

Just Stop Oil spray paint private jets and ‘target Taylor Swift’s plane’ at Stansted Airport

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ju...

Not one word about this on the Beeb. No surprise there then.

Not sure why you would want the BBC to give any publicity to these nutters?

[robinessex]

mike9009 said:

Not sure why you would want the BBC to give any publicity to these nutters?

That's the first CC supporter utterance I've almost been lost for words for a reply. Surely You Can't Be Serious ?

[turbobloke]

Where climate politics is involved, MSM are inconsistent and uncritical to say the least.

It looks suspiciously as though miracle Not Zero type claims involving a battery revolution, giving EVs very long range capability, were horseplop. UK MSM coverage to follow.

https://klimanachrichten.de/2024/06/21/das-jaehe-e...