Liz Truss Ex-Prime Minister

Author
Discussion

Catweazle

1,475 posts

145 months

Saturday 6th July
quotequote all
shtu said:
bhstewie said:
AstonZagato said:
Nonsense. They might have made a mad choice but it more down to Rishi being deemed to be the person that knifed their (the membership's) beloved BoJo than any racism. Compounded, as stated above, by the parliamentary party, conspiring to force out anyone else for whom they may have wanted to vote. Finally, Truss was seen by the membership as potentially running a Thatcherite growth / right wing agenda.

Therefore, spite, anger and madness all were more important than racism, IMHO.
That's closer to where I'd be on it than thinking it's Sunak's ethnicity.

Don't get me wrong I'm sure there's a small number for whom it did play a part but I think it was overwhelmingly what you said.

Sad thing is I have a feeling the nutters would have Truss or Johnson back tomorrow given the chance.
Perhaps, but it's worth remembering they were given a choice of,

- Sombre man talking financial reailty.
- A Maggie Thatcher cosplay telling them what they wanted to hear.
Neither of which they wanted. If Sunak's supporters had allowed Mordaunt to stand in the final two, they would have elected her and he would probably still have been chancellor. People don't like being so obviously manipulated. Rishi was the Prime Minister the members didn't want and he has been dumped at the earliest opportunity.

JagLover

43,050 posts

238 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
shtu said:
- Sombre man talking financial reailty.
- A Maggie Thatcher cosplay telling them what they wanted to hear.
Summed it up better than I did biggrin

I backed Sunak over Truss, but there are many reasons other than the default accusations of racism to explain why the membership preferred Truss.

Carl_VivaEspana

12,574 posts

265 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
bhstewie said:
Because they asked the members and the membership are nuts.
Racist, rather than nuts. I'm no fan of Sunak, but anyone with a choice between him and her objectively could never pick her. If he was white, he would have won that membership vote with a 95%+ share of the vote.
tut tut.

The choice was thatcherism vs. creeping soft socialism.

crofty1984

16,045 posts

207 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
eharding said:
bhstewie said:
Beans next to Toast.
Has beans vs. Has been
Bravo both.

ATG

20,907 posts

275 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Carl_VivaEspana said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
bhstewie said:
Because they asked the members and the membership are nuts.
Racist, rather than nuts. I'm no fan of Sunak, but anyone with a choice between him and her objectively could never pick her. If he was white, he would have won that membership vote with a 95%+ share of the vote.
tut tut.

The choice was thatcherism vs. creeping soft socialism.
You think Truss represented Thatcherism??? A gaping hole in fiscal policy is Thatcherism???

Skeptisk

7,859 posts

112 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Can the mods please change title to “ex PM / ex MP”?

Carl_VivaEspana

12,574 posts

265 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
ATG said:
You think Truss represented Thatcherism??? A gaping hole in fiscal policy is Thatcherism???
Yes, the budget (with one big exception) was Thatcherite and the regulation, spending cuts coming after, in another budget, would have cemented it.

The one exception was the energy support plan.

The outpouring of dislike, memes and general, continual dislike of her are mostly due to the fact that she represents Thatcherism.

Does the UK have a gaping hole in fiscal policy that Thatcherism needs to address? It's a bit moot now but the UK needs to find a 10-12% GDP boost or, cut 10% of total spending or, raise taxes by 10-12% or, a combination of both.

The proposal was to grow by stimulating the private sector and the middle classes but its now the latter, with the implied consequences attached to said parties (the private sector and middle classes).




Baroque attacks

4,719 posts

189 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Skeptisk said:
Can the mods please change title to “ex PM / ex MP”?
“ex PM / ex MP, but still a lunatic”

tangerine_sedge

4,967 posts

221 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Carl_VivaEspana said:
The outpouring of dislike, memes and general, continual dislike of her are mostly due to the fact that she represents Thatcherism.
No it's not. It's because even by Tory MP standards she stands out as profoundly fking weird. She sounds like someone is telling her what to say through an earpiece with a 10 second delay and is dead behind the eyes. The fact that she continues to spout nonsense and fails to recognise her own responsibility for her downfall just cements the sociopath image she projects.

But other than that, I can see why the Tory party members thought she'd do a good job /sarcasm.

skwdenyer

17,239 posts

243 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
Carl_VivaEspana said:
ATG said:
You think Truss represented Thatcherism??? A gaping hole in fiscal policy is Thatcherism???
Yes, the budget (with one big exception) was Thatcherite and the regulation, spending cuts coming after, in another budget, would have cemented it.

The one exception was the energy support plan.

The outpouring of dislike, memes and general, continual dislike of her are mostly due to the fact that she represents Thatcherism.

Does the UK have a gaping hole in fiscal policy that Thatcherism needs to address? It's a bit moot now but the UK needs to find a 10-12% GDP boost or, cut 10% of total spending or, raise taxes by 10-12% or, a combination of both.

The proposal was to grow by stimulating the private sector and the middle classes but its now the latter, with the implied consequences attached to said parties (the private sector and middle classes).
The story was that the private sector would be stimulated. But there was no evidence her proposals would achieve that. Corporate tax cuts don’t make businesses more profitable - they simply allow more money to be paid in dividends by those that are.

A proper pro-growth corporate tax strategy would be something like:

“Corporation tax rate is 0% for profits retained and reinvested, but 35% for profits distributed. Dividends must be paid from retained cash. Allowable interest is capped at BoE base + 100bp on related party loans. Transfer pricing rules are tightened up.”

We need growth, not profit-taking.

eharding

14,016 posts

287 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
Carl_VivaEspana said:
The outpouring of dislike, memes and general, continual dislike of her are mostly due to the fact that she represents Thatcherism.
No it's not. It's because even by Tory MP standards she stands out as profoundly fking weird. She sounds like someone is telling her what to say through an earpiece with a 10 second delay and is dead behind the eyes. The fact that she continues to spout nonsense and fails to recognise her own responsibility for her downfall just cements the sociopath image she projects.

But other than that, I can see why the Tory party members thought she'd do a good job /sarcasm.
Like her or not, Maggie shed more intellectual and political ability every time she trimmed her toenails than Truss possesses in her entire body and soul.

ATG

20,907 posts

275 months

Sunday 7th July
quotequote all
The "one big exception" was one of the biggest single spending commitments of any government in UK history and was anti-competitive, anti-market. And unfunded. Thatcher's wish to cut personal tax rates was based on a time when personal tax rates were much higher than they are now. And she wasn't fixated on tax. She saw fighting inflation as fundamental, and that that required fiscal prudence and a realistic understanding of monetary policy. What attention did Truss pay to inflation? What attention did she pay to fiscal prudence? She rebuked the OBR and BoE for their orthodox economic stance. fk prudence was Trussism. Thatcher saw union strength as an impediment to flexibility and productivity. That problem no longer exists. Truss seems to think the average British worker is just lazy.

Trussism such as it is anything at all certainly ain't Thatcherite.

JagLover

43,050 posts

238 months

Monday 8th July
quotequote all
ATG said:
The "one big exception" was one of the biggest single spending commitments of any government in UK history and was anti-competitive, anti-market. And unfunded. Thatcher's wish to cut personal tax rates was based on a time when personal tax rates were much higher than they are now. And she wasn't fixated on tax. She saw fighting inflation as fundamental, and that that required fiscal prudence and a realistic understanding of monetary policy. What attention did Truss pay to inflation? What attention did she pay to fiscal prudence? She rebuked the OBR and BoE for their orthodox economic stance. fk prudence was Trussism. Thatcher saw union strength as an impediment to flexibility and productivity. That problem no longer exists. Truss seems to think the average British worker is just lazy.

Trussism such as it is anything at all certainly ain't Thatcherite.
thumbup

Truss stood for Lettucism.

Pupp

12,306 posts

275 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
I reckon this little account should fit nicely here:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crgrz2d77lgo

(Reporter describes the scene at the count including the slow handclap). Lessons should be learned…

Carl_VivaEspana

12,574 posts

265 months

Solocle

3,438 posts

87 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
I heard that she was in church the Sunday before the election hoping to hold onto her majority.

Unfortunately for her, the vicar opened proceedings with "Lettuce pray". hehe

monkfish1

11,235 posts

227 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
Carl_VivaEspana said:
Productivity isnt going to improve (why would it?) so i guess its inevitable.

Blackpuddin

16,882 posts

208 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
monkfish1 said:
Carl_VivaEspana said:
Productivity isnt going to improve (why would it?) so i guess its inevitable.
Maybe it would improve with the right level and type of investment?

monkfish1

11,235 posts

227 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
monkfish1 said:
Carl_VivaEspana said:
Productivity isnt going to improve (why would it?) so i guess its inevitable.
Maybe it would improve with the right level and type of investment?
Thats always been the cease though. Why is that investment now going to start. Where are the policies that would drive that?

hidetheelephants

26,366 posts

196 months

Tuesday 9th July
quotequote all
monkfish1 said:
Thats always been the cease though. Why is that investment now going to start. Where are the policies that would drive that?
Actually build HS2, ideally minus the gold plating.