Elon Musk $41B offer for Twitter

Elon Musk $41B offer for Twitter

Author
Discussion

Durzel

12,342 posts

171 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Mars is very inhospitable. Don't know why Musk and co are so obsessed with it. Seems like it's more symbollic than it is any kind of practical destination.

98elise

27,121 posts

164 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Rivenink said:
dobbo_ said:
Rivenink said:
Musk said 20 years for those things to be flying people to Mars on a regular basis.

Now, I'm not necessarily believing that figure... but given SpaceX's track record, I wouldn't bet against them achieving it within 30.
About the same time the Roadster is delivered then!

Seriously though, he won't get anyone to Mars, because there is no money in it.

It's all chat, to hype his brand.
I think that might be short sighted.

Mars itself would offer a very exotic holiday destination. If SpaceX can crack reusability and reduce the costs down enough, space tourism will be a massive industry.

Not to mention that Mars itself probably has pristine reserves of rare earth metals that are highly valuable even in very small quantities.

Then consider the next step of asteroid mining once you have a fuel depot in orbit of Mars, supplied by fuel manufacturing on Mars.
Rare earth minerals are abundant on earth. You don't need to go to Mars.

"Rare" refers to the geology not its abundance.

98elise

27,121 posts

164 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
dobbo_ said:
EddieSteadyGo said:
See now, that is absolutely fking epic. Proper nerdgasm stuff.

He needs to stop pissing around with politics and properly get back to his spaceships and cars
There is a better near overhead shot that SpaceX broadcast during the launch. I can’t find it as a clip, but the launch is at minute 33 in this video...

https://www.youtube.com/live/2G-L0u_L0qU?si=53SEqx...



Timothy Bucktu

15,380 posts

203 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
98elise said:
dobbo_ said:
EddieSteadyGo said:
See now, that is absolutely fking epic. Proper nerdgasm stuff.

He needs to stop pissing around with politics and properly get back to his spaceships and cars
There is a better near overhead shot that SpaceX broadcast during the launch. I can’t find it as a clip, but the launch is at minute 33 in this video...

https://www.youtube.com/live/2G-L0u_L0qU?si=53SEqx...
The Video feeds are truly awesome...the whole flight yesterday was off the scale cool.
So just enjoy it while it lasts...this money burning party won't go on much longer!

Byker28i

62,203 posts

220 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
98elise said:
Cue comments about how he didn't invent rockets/tail landing/heavy boosters etc smile
Edited by 98elise on Thursday 6th June 15:02
Again, Musk is a tt, but his companies products are good, especially the rocket stuff.

dobbo_

14,578 posts

251 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
98elise said:
There is a better near overhead shot that SpaceX broadcast during the launch. I can’t find it as a clip, but the launch is at minute 33 in this video...

https://www.youtube.com/live/2G-L0u_L0qU?si=53SEqx...
Yes! That is excellent thank you

98elise

27,121 posts

164 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
dobbo_ said:
98elise said:
There is a better near overhead shot that SpaceX broadcast during the launch. I can’t find it as a clip, but the launch is at minute 33 in this video...

https://www.youtube.com/live/2G-L0u_L0qU?si=53SEqx...
Yes! That is excellent thank you
This is also pretty epic. A 360/VR clip from the tower (ie you can look up and down by moving your phone or tablet...

https://youtu.be/wly-YFGZbvA?si=5aSmZUdh-oTa42Bv

hidetheelephants

25,849 posts

196 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
98elise said:
Rare earth minerals are abundant on earth. You don't need to go to Mars.

"Rare" refers to the geology not its abundance.
yes There's enough REE sitting in US mine tailings to supply world demand for years, US environmental law renders REE processing uneconomic plus a lack of a value chain in the US prevents its use.

gazza285

9,885 posts

211 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
I’ve been to an industrial landfill site today, it is currently having the waste removed, as the waste contains enough materials of value to warrant its reprocessing.

off_again

12,486 posts

237 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Mars is very inhospitable. Don't know why Musk and co are so obsessed with it. Seems like it's more symbollic than it is any kind of practical destination.
I think its the goal of any super rich billionaire to own something big. He wants to get there, control access to it and then lay claim to the planet for his own benefits. I suspect its for the potential minerals etc that might be there. He's into Mars because he is involved in a company that builds rockets that go to space, and hence he's got no competition other than governments (who dont want to do this).

Its probably fair to assume its just what billionaires do.

KaraK

13,214 posts

212 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Mars is very inhospitable. Don't know why Musk and co are so obsessed with it. Seems like it's more symbollic than it is any kind of practical destination.
Add in the rather, erm, lacklusture internet connectivity in that neck of the solar system and it sounds like the perfect place to put the twonk. I'm behind his efforts to get to Mars 110% - just long as he's going.

dobbo_

14,578 posts

251 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Yeah but he's not going is he? It's just all standard Musk bullst and bluster.

p1stonhead

25,938 posts

170 months

Sunday 9th June
quotequote all
What the hell


Byker28i

62,203 posts

220 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Just Musk pushing Germany's far right

Riff Raff

5,173 posts

198 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Emotional intelligence by the looks of it.

Durzel

12,342 posts

171 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Don't know why but it irritates me disproportionately that Musk's acolytes attribute the success of SpaceX to him, as if he is the one engineering the rockets, etc.

His money is behind it, so it is fair to say it wouldn't be where it was without him, but that's as far as it goes. The sad part is that everyone giving him plaudits for successful launches diminishes the efforts of the real engineers and scientists that are making it happen.

Also set myself a reminder to sell my Tesla shares before the vote. Feel like the stock does not have a good outlook regardless of the outcome. If the vote passes it's going to be tied up in legal action for the way the BoD has behaved, what they've said and not said, and if it doesn't pass Musk will throw his toys out of the pram. Either way I don't see an upside for it.

98elise

27,121 posts

164 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Don't know why but it irritates me disproportionately that Musk's acolytes attribute the success of SpaceX to him, as if he is the one engineering the rockets, etc.

His money is behind it, so it is fair to say it wouldn't be where it was without him, but that's as far as it goes. The sad part is that everyone giving him plaudits for successful launches diminishes the efforts of the real engineers and scientists that are making it happen.

Also set myself a reminder to sell my Tesla shares before the vote. Feel like the stock does not have a good outlook regardless of the outcome. If the vote passes it's going to be tied up in legal action for the way the BoD has behaved, what they've said and not said, and if it doesn't pass Musk will throw his toys out of the pram. Either way I don't see an upside for it.
What makes you think he's not leading the design? Obviously there's a large team involved but he knows his stuff and it's his company.

Tom Mueller is probably the best jet propulsion guy alive and he rates Musk. Mueller gets credited as the brains behind it but he will correct people who say Musk is not leading the engineering.

Tom Mueller on Twitter: “Not true [about Elon not being in charge of engine development], I am an advisor now. Elon and the Propulsion department are leading development of the SpaceX engines, particularly Raptor. I offer my 2 cents to help from time to time“

It's worth watching the Everyday Astronaut interviews which runs to about 3 hours of mostly engineering bias chat. He clearly knows his stuff.

It's not surprising that a the son of a successful engineer, with a degree in physics, owning multiple engineering companies, and has spent 20 years or so building leading edge rockets actually knows a bit about rocket engineering smile

This isn't the thread for that discussion though. Last time I mentioned it I was told he's just parroting what he's been told!

If it's just money you've surely got to wonder why Bezos, Branson, and even Boeing so far behind? Musk might be a tt personally, but it appears he's a clever tt.


Edited by 98elise on Monday 10th June 16:27

Turtle Shed

1,629 posts

29 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Humanity either dies out on earth or become an interplanetary species. How we die out is variable, but one day the sun will eat the planet.

I'm a huge fan of Musk, and if we're going anywhere other than the moon within the next 20-30 years then he will be involved.

Oliver Hardy

2,806 posts

77 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
98elise said:
Durzel said:
Don't know why but it irritates me disproportionately that Musk's acolytes attribute the success of SpaceX to him, as if he is the one engineering the rockets, etc.

His money is behind it, so it is fair to say it wouldn't be where it was without him, but that's as far as it goes. The sad part is that everyone giving him plaudits for successful launches diminishes the efforts of the real engineers and scientists that are making it happen.

Also set myself a reminder to sell my Tesla shares before the vote. Feel like the stock does not have a good outlook regardless of the outcome. If the vote passes it's going to be tied up in legal action for the way the BoD has behaved, what they've said and not said, and if it doesn't pass Musk will throw his toys out of the pram. Either way I don't see an upside for it.
What makes you think he's not leading the design? Obviously there's a large team involved but he knows his stuff and it's his company.

Tom Mueller is probably the best jet propulsion guy alive and he rates Musk. Mueller gets credited as the brains behind it but he will correct people who say Musk is not leading the engineering.

Tom Mueller on Twitter: “Not true [about Elon not being in charge of engine development], I am an advisor now. Elon and the Propulsion department are leading development of the SpaceX engines, particularly Raptor. I offer my 2 cents to help from time to time“

It's worth watching the Everyday Astronaut interviews which run to about 3 hours of mostly engineering bias chat. He clearly knows his stuff.

It's not surprising that a the son of a successful engineer, with a degree in physics, owning multiple engineering companies, and has spent 10 years or so building rockets actually knows a bit about rocket engineering smile

This isn't the thread for that discussion though. Last time I mentioned it I was told he's just parroting what he's been told!

If it's just money you've surely got to wonder why Bezos, Branson, and even Boeing so far behind? Musk might be a tt personally, but it appears he's a clever tt.


Edited by 98elise on Monday 10th June 15:35
Is Musk an engineer? He doesn't appear to have any formal qualifications in engineering and so would he have the knowledge to be a lead designer of a space rocket.

Isn't a lot of SpaceX funded by the government as is the satellite company forget the name?

EddieSteadyGo

12,370 posts

206 months

Monday 10th June
quotequote all
Durzel said:
...

Also set myself a reminder to sell my Tesla shares before the vote. Feel like the stock does not have a good outlook regardless of the outcome. If the vote passes it's going to be tied up in legal action for the way the BoD has behaved, what they've said and not said, and if it doesn't pass Musk will throw his toys out of the pram. Either way I don't see an upside for it.
Personally, I would advise against selling before the vote. Most of the 'bad news' is already largely priced in (likely bad Q2 numbers, uncertainty on Musk's comp package, lack of clarity on Model 2 etc). I think there is a lot of pent up energy waiting for any good news to give those a reason who are currently on the sidelines to jump back in, which will cause a jump in the price.

In my view, we could easily see a surge in price taking it over $200/share between now and the end of the year. It just needs some progress on FSD, or Robotaxi to not look like vapourware, or better sales following reductions in interest rates etc.