Films that didn't, but should have had, a sequel...

[PaulHogan]

There are so many awful films which have spawned vol2, 3, 4 ...etc.

But what films really should have had a sequel?

[bobr]

The Italian Job

[Adz The Rat]

Zombieland.

[FourWheelDrift]

Firefox.

[Webber3]

Titanic

[adycav]

Webber3 said:

Titanic

I can honestly say I'm struggling with this OP, I can't think of ANY films that could do with a sequel...

[HowMuchLonger]

Starwars?

[FourWheelDrift]

Webber3 said:

Titanic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD4OnHCRd_4

[redtwin]

Slingblade
Broken Flowers
Punch Drunk Love
Pulp Fiction

[CobolMan]

FourWheelDrift said:

Firefox.

Firefox Down would have made a brilliant film.

[MrV]

Adz The Rat said:

Zombieland.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni5360881/

[Jasandjules]

Webber3 said:

Titanic

Raise the Titanic?

[Morningside]

The Goonies.

[ofcorsa]

Bladerunner

[ali_kat]

bobr said:

The Italian Job

[Morningside]

ali_kat said:

bobr said:

The Italian Job

Going by the last Americanized balls up. No thanks.

[samuelellis]

MrV said:

Adz The Rat said:

Zombieland.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni5360881/

YaY

that is all

[callyman]

Morningside said:

The Goonies.

Good shout.

[Silver Smudger]

adycav said:

I can honestly say I'm struggling with this OP, I can't think of ANY films that could do with a sequel...

Exactly - The only reason for a sequel should be when making a series of stories into a series of films. Most sequels are started more along the lines of "We made loads of money with that, let's try to duplicate it"

[Dr Derek Doctors]

Superbad