Joker: Folie à Deux

Author
Discussion

Petrus1983

Original Poster:

9,825 posts

169 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
So the sequel to The Joker comes out (UK) today. I'd been really looking forwards to this - but the reviews are pretty shocking -

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/joker_folie_a_deu...

The trailer looks 'interesting' -

https://youtu.be/_OKAwz2MsJs?si=EYad1brPvu5xK97v

I'm off to see it this evening but mainly for an evening out than to see a repeat of what was delivered last time.

limpsfield

6,193 posts

260 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
2 stars in The Times this morning, although that can be a bit hit and miss. ‘A messy lifeless sequel’ and ‘derivative musical’.

I’m seeing it Monday, with low expectations.

anonymous-user

61 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
From what I've seen, its the ending that is pissing people off. I know what it is and my thoughts are that its entirely in keeping with what the 1st one was all about.

I've not seen Joker and have no plans to. I couldn't get past the idea that its really just the king of comedy with a bit of taxi driver thrown in. This second one sounds like 'contractual obligation' sequel-itis.

MiniMan64

17,501 posts

197 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
It’s getting absolutely destroyed online which caught me by surprise given how well received the first one was

BunkMoreland

1,026 posts

14 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
It’s getting absolutely destroyed online which caught me by surprise given how well received the first one was
The first one isn't even that good. Its not terrible, but the character arc isnt that engaging. You don't root for him really, even in the antihero way.

I always thought the critics bigged this up and that's what made people watch it. Not that it was a good film. In fact I'm struggling to think of any performance Phoenix has done that makes me think "yep hes great"

zb

2,980 posts

171 months

Friday 4th October
quotequote all
BunkMoreland said:
The first one isn't even that good. Its not terrible, but the character arc isnt that engaging. You don't root for him really, even in the antihero way.

I always thought the critics bigged this up and that's what made people watch it. Not that it was a good film. In fact I'm struggling to think of any performance Phoenix has done that makes me think "yep hes great"
Cash in Walk the Line, the Roman fella in Gladiator. However, I agree with your assessment of Joker. The sort of film those who go on to shoot up schools venerate.

Prak

765 posts

225 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
BunkMoreland said:
The first one isn't even that good. Its not terrible, but the character arc isnt that engaging. You don't root for him really, even in the antihero way.

I always thought the critics bigged this up and that's what made people watch it. Not that it was a good film.
Disagree. I've seen it three times now I think, and so many films these days I struggle to care about even once.

Possibly it annoys people who were expecting a standard comic book movie. It's absolutely not a Batman film and is only tangentially connected to that world. It's a movie about how society is breaking down, and how a struggling man with mental health issues falls through the cracks in the system. It's an illustration of why we see people going on stabbing rampages.

Prak

765 posts

225 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
zb said:
The sort of film those who go on to shoot up schools venerate.
Well, possibly, in the same way that those who go on to do illegal street racing or car theft or joyriding might venerate Fast & Furious movies.

If we take away all films that are liked by someone who goes on to do bad things, what are we left with?

It's an "all dogs are animals" thing. It might be that most school shooters like the movie ... but it's clearly not the case that everyone who likes the movie goes on to do school shootings .


zb

2,980 posts

171 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
Prak said:
Well, possibly, in the same way that those who go on to do illegal street racing or car theft or joyriding might venerate Fast & Furious movies.

If we take away all films that are liked by someone who goes on to do bad things, what are we left with?

It's an "all dogs are animals" thing. It might be that most school shooters like the movie ... but it's clearly not the case that everyone who likes the movie goes on to do school shootings .
That's an intellectual fallacy and a false equivalency, and you know it. Shame on you.

Petrus1983

Original Poster:

9,825 posts

169 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
Ok - errr - what to say. It wasn't terrible - but I feel like you have to see it as a film that isn't a sequel to Joker and isn't part of DC Comics. It's a bit something and nothing. At the same time I can't comment on the end as we decided to leave - 2hrs 18m would be pushing it even for an exceptional film and this certainly wasn't that.

tangerine_sedge

5,174 posts

225 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
zb said:
BunkMoreland said:
The first one isn't even that good. Its not terrible, but the character arc isnt that engaging. You don't root for him really, even in the antihero way.

I always thought the critics bigged this up and that's what made people watch it. Not that it was a good film. In fact I'm struggling to think of any performance Phoenix has done that makes me think "yep hes great"
Cash in Walk the Line, the Roman fella in Gladiator. However, I agree with your assessment of Joker. The sort of film those who go on to shoot up schools venerate.
Considering that it was a previous mainstream traditional 'batman - the dark knight rises' movie which was the scene of the Aurora shooting incident, your statement is as innacurate as it is distasteful.

Greendubber

13,827 posts

210 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
Been to see it tonight, too long, dull, couldn't wait to get out at the end. Miserable song after miserable song.

Shame.

bloomen

7,451 posts

166 months

Saturday 5th October
quotequote all
Watched the first one when there was nothing else at the cinema.

Can't fault the performances or the look, but it felt like a film that didn't really need to ever exist.

Sounds even more so with this. I'll catch this on a flight or Gameboy sometime.

gruntmonster

173 posts

224 months

Sunday 6th October
quotequote all
The best part for me was the popcorn and revels I ate during it!!…what an absolute turd of a film / musical or whatever it’s suppose to be!

Edited by gruntmonster on Sunday 6th October 13:29

Voldemort

6,587 posts

285 months

Sunday 6th October
quotequote all
Petrus1983 said:
It wasn't terrible - but we decided to leave
I can count on one hand the films I've walked out on and they were, without exception, terrible.

I'll certainly not be paying for a cinema seat to see this and am unlikely to watch it when it comes on free to air given what I've read.

BunkMoreland

1,026 posts

14 months

Sunday 6th October
quotequote all

CT05 Nose Cone

25,236 posts

234 months

Sunday 6th October
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
zb said:
BunkMoreland said:
The first one isn't even that good. Its not terrible, but the character arc isnt that engaging. You don't root for him really, even in the antihero way.

I always thought the critics bigged this up and that's what made people watch it. Not that it was a good film. In fact I'm struggling to think of any performance Phoenix has done that makes me think "yep hes great"
Cash in Walk the Line, the Roman fella in Gladiator. However, I agree with your assessment of Joker. The sort of film those who go on to shoot up schools venerate.
Considering that it was a previous mainstream traditional 'batman - the dark knight rises' movie which was the scene of the Aurora shooting incident, your statement is as innacurate as it is distasteful.
Could be that people did not want to emulate the character, the claims it would inspire shooting sprees were proven to be complete nonsense, but more could connect with his struggles with mental health and isolation from an uncaring world. But far easier to dismiss them as incels and make a sequel that sticks a middle finger up to all that I guess.

SoulGlo

136 posts

38 months

Monday 7th October
quotequote all
A good Joaquin Phoenix movie is "Her" by Spike Jonze.


JagLover

43,785 posts

242 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
It’s getting absolutely destroyed online which caught me by surprise given how well received the first one was
From what I understand, bearing in mind I haven't seen either but hope to watch the first some day, it is precisely due to how well the first one did that means the backlash now.

As in there were many men who identified with him in the first one and think this movie is a hit job.

limpsfield

6,193 posts

260 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
I saw it last night, big fan of the first one.

It really is a musical. I feel it takes a while to get going. It's a completely different feel to the first one and I can see why it has got low scores and generally poor reviews.

It was okay, but quite forgettable, which is not something I would say about the first film. I don't think I will watch it again in the future.