Back to the Future Reboot - Is NOTHING sacred!

Back to the Future Reboot - Is NOTHING sacred!

Author
Discussion

Trevatanus

Original Poster:

11,217 posts

157 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
There are few films I would not welcome a reboot of, but BTTF is definitely one of them.
I have a horrible feeling that they will mess this up.

https://insidethemagic.net/2024/04/back-to-the-fut...

dundarach

5,380 posts

235 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Don't worry, it'll be great!

Funk

26,578 posts

216 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Agreed - BTTF is almost the perfect film and should be left alone; I wouldn't watch a reboot of it. It's lazy - Hollywood has run out of good ideas so they look back at things that did well in the past and assume we'll all put on rose-tinted glasses and pony up to watch.

What they SHOULD do is reboot films that had a fantastic premise/plot but were terribly-made (and as such were a let-down) at the time.

TikTak

1,828 posts

26 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
BTTF aside, I don't know why you'd pick a film so well made and brilliant the first time round anyway

Which leads to this (100% agree).

Funk said:
What they SHOULD do is reboot films that had a fantastic premise/plot but were terribly-made (and as such were a let-down) at the time.
On this specifically. It'll be bad and at best it'll be "not as good as" the original. Pointless endeavor. Oh aside from inevitably spinning some money/merch I guess. Sad times.

remedy

1,761 posts

198 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Funk said:
Agreed - BTTF is almost the perfect film and should be left alone; I wouldn't watch a reboot of it. It's lazy - Hollywood has run out of good ideas so they look back at things that did well in the past and assume we'll all put on rose-tinted glasses and pony up to watch.

What they SHOULD do is reboot films that had a fantastic premise/plot but were terribly-made (and as such were a let-down) at the time.
Exactly. If they are that keen on the BTTF franchise, why not just make BTTF4?
They can still tick all the DEI boxes they need to without being 'tainted' by comparisons with the original.

...Or, just leave it alone and come up with your own original idea!

JagLover

43,801 posts

242 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Funk said:
What they SHOULD do is reboot films that had a fantastic premise/plot but were terribly-made (and as such were a let-down) at the time.
100% agree

Don't necessarily need to be terrible, just forgotten and due a resurrection.

Muzzer79

11,062 posts

194 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
I’m actually surprised that BTTF has remained unmolested over nearly 40 years - a testament to its original creators’ will to not have it corrupted

I agree a remake isn’t necessary - the original, if anything, gets better as the years go on.

Looking at the mess they made of Star Wars, etc I fear for this.

Perhaps a TV miniseries inspired by the original - a spinoff if you will - could be practical. But you can’t recast Marty or Doc Brown so those characters are effectively out of it.

Megaflow

9,923 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th April
quotequote all
There is only one response to this:

Fcensoredk off.

Gary C

13,171 posts

186 months

Wednesday 17th April
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
I’m actually surprised that BTTF has remained unmolested over nearly 40 years -.
40 years !!!!

oh fk frown

Im now officially old....

The Moose

23,123 posts

216 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Not only is BTTF one of my favorite films (and definitely favorite trilogy), it's my wife's also. We've already started indoctrinating our kids by getting them into the music!

Time4another

278 posts

10 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Writers Robert Zemekis and Bob Gale have always said there will be no reboot while they are alive. Obviously money talks but there is no mention in that article of how they have got Zemekis and Gale on side.

bobbo89

5,565 posts

152 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
You guys actually read the article?

"Producer and director J.J. Abrams is gearing up to put his own spin on the beloved franchise. While it won’t be a direct remake, Abrams is planning an homage to the spirit of Back to the Future, much like his approach with Super 8 (2011) and Steven Spielberg’s E.T.: The Extraterrestrial (1982)"

It's not a remake, in the same way Super 8 wasn't a remake of E.T. It'll simply take aspects of it and weave it into a different story. Has potential IMO and it'll be cool to see a film that nods to one of my all time favourites...

funinhounslow

1,802 posts

149 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
I can see the logic in this. I regard BTTF as highly as everyone else here but how would teenagers today see it when they will view the 80s as ancient history?

I can see the logic of a reboot setting the film in the present day and sending McFly back to the mid 90s (now I feel really old biggrin ).

Could he horrendous. Might be quite good. But it’s unlikely to top the original, though in my eyes wouldn’t taint it either…

jbailey114

81 posts

9 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Oh please no. Leave it alone. As others have said, the original films were perfect.

Sheets Tabuer

19,648 posts

222 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
As long as Melissa McCarthy is in it I don't care.

White-Noise

4,558 posts

255 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bobbo89 said:
You guys actually read the article?

"Producer and director J.J. Abrams is gearing up to put his own spin on the beloved franchise. While it won’t be a direct remake, Abrams is planning an homage to the spirit of Back to the Future, much like his approach with Super 8 (2011) and Steven Spielberg’s E.T.: The Extraterrestrial (1982)"

It's not a remake, in the same way Super 8 wasn't a remake of E.T. It'll simply take aspects of it and weave it into a different story. Has potential IMO and it'll be cool to see a film that nods to one of my all time favourites...
This is my thinking. Back to the future and the sequels are just absolutely incredible, and thinking about it are films I could easily watch again and again. I wouldn't want to see it re made.

But this to me suggests it's not a re make, I'm not sure what a re boot is exactly. But an homage, something along a similar line with a more modern take on it I don't have an issue with. Those original films will be forever classics and favourites. My perception this is something in a similar vein inspired by them but as separate films. If its good then great, if its crap then it will be forgotten and life continues. If its good and it doesn't rip off the original then I'll be more than happy.

bobbo89

5,565 posts

152 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
White-Noise said:
bobbo89 said:
You guys actually read the article?

"Producer and director J.J. Abrams is gearing up to put his own spin on the beloved franchise. While it won’t be a direct remake, Abrams is planning an homage to the spirit of Back to the Future, much like his approach with Super 8 (2011) and Steven Spielberg’s E.T.: The Extraterrestrial (1982)"

It's not a remake, in the same way Super 8 wasn't a remake of E.T. It'll simply take aspects of it and weave it into a different story. Has potential IMO and it'll be cool to see a film that nods to one of my all time favourites...
This is my thinking. Back to the future and the sequels are just absolutely incredible, and thinking about it are films I could easily watch again and again. I wouldn't want to see it re made.

But this to me suggests it's not a re make, I'm not sure what a re boot is exactly. But an homage, something along a similar line with a more modern take on it I don't have an issue with. Those original films will be forever classics and favourites. My perception this is something in a similar vein inspired by them but as separate films. If its good then great, if its crap then it will be forgotten and life continues. If its good and it doesn't rip off the original then I'll be more than happy.
You'd have to be nuts to try and re-make BTTF, they deserve to be left alone as a piece of cinematic history. What I think you can do however is create a film that respectfully doff's the cap to them and I think that's what Abrams will do.

E.T. is another favourite of mine and TBH I didn't immediately connect the dots on first watching Super 8 which IMO is really good.

P-Jay

10,802 posts

198 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Time4another said:
Writers Robert Zemekis and Bob Gale have always said there will be no reboot while they are alive. Obviously money talks but there is no mention in that article of how they have got Zemekis and Gale on side.
The headline is misleading, it's a BTTF like film, but not like the original precisely because Bob Gale won't have it.

JerseyRoyal

117 posts

7 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
The idea that old IP you like should be left in stasis doesn’t make sense from a business or creative pov tbh.

If people feel like there are more stories to tell/money to be made they’re going to do it.

I think the “requel” trend just now is better than the sequel or reboot dynamic tbh.

Some of the recent series continuations have been pretty good.

LARK F1 GTR

3,688 posts

153 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
dundarach said:
Don't worry, it'll be great!
That or one of the lead characters will be a poc. They cannot leave things alone!