Harry's Garage - YouTube
Discussion
NomduJour said:
Course not, it's machined from billet.
Did look lovely. Not actually a fan of the car looks wise but was fascinated to learn some of the needy details that differentiate it from the F Type.
That sound is fantastic. I think JLR have hot the nail on the head allowing the AJ unit to shout in some of its models. Always reminds me of the Charger in Bullett.
With this channel and Chris' new venture things are looking good for petrolheads.
I just watched the FF road trip video again, this is exactly the sort if review I love, great format, even better with cars I might be able to afford, but even with it being a £250k car the review made it sound obtainable.
Keep 'em coming Harry!
I just watched the FF road trip video again, this is exactly the sort if review I love, great format, even better with cars I might be able to afford, but even with it being a £250k car the review made it sound obtainable.
Keep 'em coming Harry!
M4SER said:
EricE said:
Nice car but I really hope this doesn't turn into a JLR promotion channel. :-/
No chance, it's my channel, so I decide what goes in.. Next few vids coming up will be as equally varied as the first two; classics, supercars, sheds, etc. All of these will feature at some point over the coming months. Thanks for watching!
It's a great channel.
My favourite bit of Evo has always been 'Fast Fleet', particularly when your cars were featured, and hopefully 'Harry's Garage' will include the same details of what these cars are really like to live with.
E65Ross said:
It doesn't strictly matter because they're multiplied by each other, no? It's not like miles per hour, for example, where one is divided by the other which makes a difference on the calculated figure.
Well, to me, a measurement of twisting/turning power can't be measured in feet per pound, but can be measured in pound per foot turned.TheLordJohn said:
E65Ross said:
It doesn't strictly matter because they're multiplied by each other, no? It's not like miles per hour, for example, where one is divided by the other which makes a difference on the calculated figure.
Well, to me, a measurement of twisting/turning power can't be measured in feet per pound, but can be measured in pound per foot turned.I love this comment on Wiki:
"The name "pound-foot", intended to minimize confusion with the foot-pound as a unit of work, was apparently first proposed by British physicist Arthur Mason Worthington. However, foot-pound (ft·lb or ft·lbf) is also sometimes used interchangeably with "pound-foot" to express torque."
Well that worked didn't it?
"The name "pound-foot", intended to minimize confusion with the foot-pound as a unit of work, was apparently first proposed by British physicist Arthur Mason Worthington. However, foot-pound (ft·lb or ft·lbf) is also sometimes used interchangeably with "pound-foot" to express torque."
Well that worked didn't it?
Harris_I said:
TheLordJohn said:
E65Ross said:
It doesn't strictly matter because they're multiplied by each other, no? It's not like miles per hour, for example, where one is divided by the other which makes a difference on the calculated figure.
Well, to me, a measurement of twisting/turning power can't be measured in feet per pound, but can be measured in pound per foot turned.Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff