3D tv.......why is a new Sky+ box and 3D tv required?

3D tv.......why is a new Sky+ box and 3D tv required?

Author
Discussion

M-J-B

Original Poster:

15,144 posts

256 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
My daughter has various 3D movies which she views either in the games room through a projector, or on the Pano plasma. She needs to wear glasses and it seems to work fine, it's 3D as far as I can see.

So why the need for a new tv and box to view 3d when Sky launch it shortly?

I can't get my head around why a red and blue image (or whatever it is that the glasses sort out) can't be broadcast through my Sky+ HD box to my normal tv, we wear glasses and bingo, you have 3D tv. If I remember correctly there have been 3D programmes broadcast successfully previously.

Is there a bit of a con going on here confused


randlemarcus

13,588 posts

237 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
Red and green is so last century. This time around, the glasses cost hundreds of pounds, and its honestly not a marketing gimmick. This time. Honest.

FlossyThePig

4,092 posts

249 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
3D is the new Betamax!

There are differences between the systems produced by each manufacturer. Most require electronic glasses that will only work on their system. You may get two in the box but additional ones can cost about £100.

Until 3D TV is like that in the old TV programme "The Flipside of Dominick Hyde" then count me out.

M-J-B

Original Poster:

15,144 posts

256 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
I just can't understand why it's so 'special' and [b]has[\b] to be viewed through a new tv.

I took my 4 year old today to see Toy Story 3 in 3D and is was really good, but they didn't have a special tele and Sky box........maybe Plotless can't shed some light on the matter!

headcase

2,389 posts

223 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
The new version of 3D dosent use red/blue filter glasses that caused massive eye strain and colour irregularities. Insted 2 completely different images are sent to each eye individually, in order to do this you need a 3D complient TV, so you get a full resolution image with no colour offset. If you want to recieve a 3D picture then you are going to need either a 3D blu-Ray player, a newer SKy box or i believe there is a 3D option with freesat.
Please feel free to ignore this post like all of the others as my name isnt Plotloss either. (there is a PM function you know wink )

M-J-B

Original Poster:

15,144 posts

256 months

Saturday 21st August 2010
quotequote all
headcase said:
The new version of 3D dosent use red/blue filter glasses that caused massive eye strain and colour irregularities. Insted 2 completely different images are sent to each eye individually, in order to do this you need a 3D complient TV, so you get a full resolution image with no colour offset. If you want to recieve a 3D picture then you are going to need either a 3D blu-Ray player, a newer SKy box or i believe there is a 3D option with freesat.
Please feel free to ignore this post like all of the others as my name isnt Plotloss either. (there is a PM function you know wink )
I have no intention of ignoring your post.......you obviously work for LG and you are trying to convince me that it's not a con wink

Interesting and seems a reasonable explanation.







Even if I still think we are all being conned wink

headcase

2,389 posts

223 months

Sunday 22nd August 2010
quotequote all
Nope not LG wink

danyeates

7,248 posts

228 months

Monday 23rd August 2010
quotequote all
headcase said:
The new version of 3D dosent use red/blue filter glasses that caused massive eye strain and colour irregularities. Insted 2 completely different images are sent to each eye individually, in order to do this you need a 3D complient TV, so you get a full resolution image with no colour offset. If you want to recieve a 3D picture then you are going to need either a 3D blu-Ray player, a newer SKy box or i believe there is a 3D option with freesat.
Please feel free to ignore this post like all of the others as my name isnt Plotloss either. (there is a PM function you know wink )
Yeah, what he said.

AV receivers are also having to be upgraded, as are HMDI cable standards (now V1.4 I think)! They now need to be able to process two completely separate HD images, rather than one in the same time scales. Go to Currys or Comet or something and watch their 3D TV's without the glasses and you'll get an idea how they work.

Golden fleece

362 posts

176 months

Monday 23rd August 2010
quotequote all
Does the 3D picture on a 3D TV have the same subdued, muted colours you get when watching 3D at the cinema? That's the biggest thing that pisses me off!

headcase

2,389 posts

223 months

Monday 23rd August 2010
quotequote all
The colours look the same but the picture is noticably darker through the glasses, presumably due to the image jumping from one eye to another very quickly wink

M-J-B

Original Poster:

15,144 posts

256 months

Monday 23rd August 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the answers!

So it seems there might be more to this than meets the eye wink

XG332

3,927 posts

194 months

Monday 23rd August 2010
quotequote all
i was chatting to a friend in a sony centre. They have a tv they converts any input to 3D.

headcase

2,389 posts

223 months

Tuesday 24th August 2010
quotequote all
The Samsungs do that also, its not a patch on mastered 3D, it basically adds a little depth to the picture.

Tycho

11,832 posts

279 months

Tuesday 24th August 2010
quotequote all
Sky 3D works with any current Sky+ HD box. You just need a 3D capable TV to go with it.